jakee

Or . . . maybe it's a guy who understands the concept behind the separation of church and state. Maybe it was a drunk or someone who couldn't handle their medication and fell asleep at the wheel. Heck, does anyone know where Tiger Woods was at the time...? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

It sounded to me like he stated the idea that Trump himself did some criminal collusion with the Russians was bullshit. Which is fine, because that's never been the story. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

If enough people don't like the work assignments, their oxygen supply will get cut off anyway. This isn't something that's going to work with the wrong people. Fine for Generation 0. What happens a few years down the line? At a general level, is it that different to how it works on earth? Some people need to grow food. Some people need to work in the sewers. Some people need to work in the mines. Some people need to do everything that needs to be done for society to function. And they do. In a sense it would be easier for Mars generation 1, 2, 3 etc to do what needs to be done, because they won't know any different. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

I'm just wondering if Winsor is planning on coming back to this thread at all, considering that his (flimsy in any case) justification for starting the thread appears to be total bullshit... Maybe he'll just be back again in another 6 months to start a third "I don't care about trans people but hasn't everyone had enough of trans people?" thread. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

I think you've linked to the wrong law. That one does nothing of the sort. Unless you're so preoccupied with keeping tabs on queer folk that you've jumped to the wrong conclusions, of course. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Huh? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

You do remember doing this before, right? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

And how much CO2 does making that V8 release? Who comes out ahead after production and 8 years use of the Tesla vs production and 8 years use of the V8? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

That was actually the point. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Sworn off the day after someone from the other side takes the ugly advice he's been doling out for decades. Yeah, how convenient. Let's see if he lasts through the midterms. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Read this, genuinely read through it, then we'll see if you've got the balls to come back and apologise for trying to pretend that the man isn't a overt racist, or if you're too weaselly to ever admit when you're wrong. You say, in a thread in which you claim to be able to diagnose the fact that the entire democrat base is infected by spreading hatred of the right, based on a few isolated quotes by fringe groups. Dude, you're so far down the rabbit hole you don't even realise there's a world outside it. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

It is done because Nugent constantly calls black people niggers, and called half black half white Obama a subhuman mongrel. Do you disagree that this is overt racism? If so, there's nothing more to say to you, enjoy your fantasy world. If not, is your argument that Nugent might not be a racist, he just plays one on tv? In that case, right back at ya - you don't personally know any of the liberals you're accusing of hate mongering, therefore you don't know that they mean it, therefore there's no problem. And yes, this really does sum everything up. You refuse to accept any reasonable criticism of Nugent because he is on the same side of the aisle as you. You pretend that calling an overt racist a racist is a political ploy because it fits your preconceived notion that all accusations of racism are purely politically motivated. You're blinded by partisanship and unable rationally address the issues you're ranting about. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

First, that's because the number of apologies contained in that story for threatening to kill Obama was zero. Read it again, he did not apologise. The only thing he apologised for was calling Obama a subhuman mongrel (and you say he's not a racist? Classy!). when it comes to calling for murder, he simply said he wasn't going to do to anymore (which reminds me, I have a bridge for sale. Interested?). Second, even if he had apologised, he first threatened to kill Obama ten years ago. Are you seriously saying you have no problem with him propagating this rhetoric for ten years just because he now says he wont do it anymore? In which case, why are you mad at any of the fringe liberals who are talking about Trump? Surely you shoud be waiting until 2027 to see if they're still doing it before deciding whether it was ever a problem? Yeah, too much defending of overt racists like Nugent. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Obama, he's a piece of shit, and I told him to suck on my machine gun. Let's hear it for him. And then I was in New York. I said, "Hey, Hillary, you might want to ride one of these into the sunset, you worthless bitch. Since I'm in California, how about Barbara Boxer, she might want to suck on my machine gun. And Dianne Feinstein, ride one of these you worthless whore. Any questions? Ok, so let's see how he walked that back... If Barack Obama becomes the president in November, again, I will be either be dead or in jail by this time next year. Yep, seems legit Of course not. No-one says that except for the far right. It's one of the lies you tell yourself to justify your hatred of the left. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Are you really that weak? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Haha, brilliant. So you, an addict, are telling me that Bill's brother's drug problem is evidence that Bill is a killer? Fuckin' A So I can make up any shit that I want about your family, and use your addiction as evidence for it, can I? I believe that since absolutely nothing you have presented above has anything to do with the Clintons killing anyone that there is indeed no evidence whatsoever that the Clintons killed anyone Do you want to have an ideagasm?

And that is the lie. Not your opinion about the TV show, your opinion about the real Clintons in real life. Whether you're knowingly bullshitting or whether you're so gullible and easily led that you believe it, the idea that the Clintons had political associates murdered is a lie, and you're trying to spread it. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

As pointless and juvenile as your constant trolling is, your misdirection and sleight of hand is impressive. When you say that the Underwoods remind you I the Cointons because the Clintons killed people that is not just 'an opinion about a to show' - it is an allegation that, in the real world, the Clintons killed people. So not only is it a lie about liberal politicians, you're lying about lying about them. Truly, you are in good company with Trump! Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Daily on prime time in the US? Absolutely. Daily on prime time globally? Nowhere near as often, because he simply didn't do as much stupid shit on a daily basis. If anything, Trump is far less scrutinised than Obama when it comes to minor personal issues, appearances, or pismronunciations. Because Trump has been under such a cloud of real, serious allegations and political errors since taking office that no one even has time to cover the small stuff that Obama was always slammed over. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

The guy that Reagan murdered in Reno doesn't count? Just because he went senile doesn't mean he should get a free pass Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Reagan once shot a man in Reno just to watch him die. There you go, Reagan is allegedly linked to murder. Ipso facto, House of Cards was based on Ronnie and Nancy

Obama ordered a burger with mustard and a supposedly serious news show host dedicated an entire segment to slamming him over it. Trump more scrutinized? Sorry, don't see it. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Reagan once shot a man in Reno just to watch him die. There you go, Reagan is allegedly linked to murder. Ipso facto, House of Cards was based on Ronnie and Nancy

I don't subscribe to that. I think you Americans have a tendency to venerate the office so much you can't reconcile it with the incumbent being a human person. Everyone needs down time with someone or something. If you were 'being President' all the time you'd go insane (ok, Trump already is, but hey). I don't think it's a good idea for a politician of that level to tweet random thoughts on pop culture and it should be criticized, but if Trump decided to tell everyone which couples he hoped stayed together at the end of Celebrity Love Island I hope we're all perceptive enough to understand that's not the official position of the Executive Branch of the US Government. OTOH, anything tweeted about anything related to the responsibilities and actions of his office, or any other government departments - that is said with his presidential hat on. Oh sure, it would be insane. But those right wing pundits are a bunch of vitriolic, hypocritical, crybaby pussies who'd argue that the sky should be green if Obama said how nice and blue it was. It's not a good model for any political discourse or news reporting. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

The only caveat is that Twitter can also be used as a substitute for informal conversation - but it's pretty easy to distinguish the two. So when the Real Donald bitches about Arnie's ratings on The Apprentice that's not an official White House statement. When he says the ban really is a ban and they only called it something else to fool the courts, that is the official position of the Oval Office; anyone saying otherwise is lying to themselves and everyone else. Do you want to have an ideagasm?