jakee

Well at least it can’t be related to some major foreign policy decision that happ… oh.

Which part of ‘it’s not fucking true’ are you incapable of understanding? Seriously man, if you disagree we can talk about it but when you’re deliberately not doing that and can only pretend you’re somehow being misunderstood then I don’t know how you can pretend you’re not the one fucking around and trying to score points. Hi Wendy

It’s unbelievably obvious that I am talking about that as well. I know you didn’t get lost on that one, so it’s a pretty fucking shameful attempt at a diversion.

Man that’s a whole load of useless words when ‘oops’ would have been sufficient. Why can’t you just admit such an obviously stupid mistake?

Soldiers fuck with those they may be going into battle with. Christ knows where you got lost with that one, it was pretty fucking simple.

As long as Nato armies aren't invading we've already seen that Putin's nuclear bluster is an empty threat. Weapons that can hit Russian bases a few hundred miles inside their borders is not going to flick that switch. By the way, if you're now arguing that America is in this purely for self interest that's just another reason for you to quit whining about anyone else's defense spending. It's not our job to help you achieve your policy goals.

Why does something that has nothing to do with what I said make it bullshit? Calm down for once and think before you speak. How about we take a trip back into the mists of time when I said the majority of what the US spends its defense money on is useless to Ukraine and you said that was bullshit. What changed your mind between then and now?

And that perspective leads him to believe things that are not true. Calling it a perspective doesn't give some blanket immunity to challenge. How often do you make sure you say nice things about Trump?

Most of what the US spends its defense and R&D money on is completely and utterly useless to Ukraine, and not much better than that to the US. How many carrier battle groups have you given them?

??? No-one's talking about invading Russia or has any intention of invading Russia. But so far with about 5 exceptions every bit of ordinance used in this war by both sides has exploded on Ukrainian territory, devastating Ukrainian land, infrastructure, culture and people. Russia acts as if those 5 or so exceptions are shocking, unprecedented and unjustified violations of its national sovereignty rather than natural consequences of starting a war on their own border. So far NATO and the EU have effectively played along with that narrative, as does talk about 'invading Russia'. There's no good reason why Ukraine should bear the entire brunt of the damage from this war, and no good reason why they should not be able to strike at the military equipment and infrastructure inside Russian border that is continuing to support and facilitate the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

That’s literally what underestimating means. A gaffe like that from Biden and you would say it’s proof he has dementia.

That’s not just what you’re saying. You’re quoting what Trump said on TV while complaining that other people are the ‘useful idiots’. Look in a mirror.

When I quote the US military itself saying the US military has a problem with systemic racism, what kind of fantasy is that? I’m afraid that you’re succumbing to the lure of both-siderism and as a result talking bullshit. Either that or you’re under the impression I’ve said something I haven’t. I’m only arguing that the US military isn’t uniquely good, I’m absolutely not claiming that it’s uniquely bad.

When he says it’s ‘tempered’ to a point where it isn’t a problem he’s not correct, he’s living in a fantasy land.

No, completely true. I gave you multiple reports of internal US military investigations concluding that they had problems with systemic racism in the US armed forces and US military court system and you dismissed than as ‘isolated incidents’. Either you lied about reading the sources or read them and lied about what they said. Either way you’re too closed minded to accept the world as it is rather than as you want it to be. Laughably naive and demonstrably false. It’s attitudes like yours that enable ongoing racist and sexist abuse of decent people serving their country. You should be ashamed.

Wait, I thought you’re not saying anything was faked? Grow a fucking spine and say what you fucking think. You have the gall to talk about useful idiots when you’re doing nothing but spreading conspiracist bollocks?

Oh hey look, a diversion.

Right, the GOP have treated McCain and his family fucking disgracefully since he was a candidate, so what hope does anyone else have?

Why not?

You said you questioned the lack of video. You strongly implied that without it you’re justified in questioning whether any part of it is true. You questioned the glass from the window being in the ‘wrong’ place but claim you never suggested anything was faked. So what ARE you saying that has any basis in the reality we share? How complicated is the Pelosi’s have more important things to worry about than showing you a crazy person breaking into their home? Again, in reality that is a very simple statement. A conspiracy with the Pelosis hiding the truth, 2 police forces complicit and the suspect not being exactly what his online presence appears to be is far more complicated. Again, that’s just reality.

See, why do you do this? What do you expect me to say when you know that I know you’re not replying to the reality of what I said?

If you’re unaware that recording systems are monitored by humans then again, I don’t know what shared basis of reality we have that will allow a legitimate discussion.

First, you have no right to see the video. A clip would have to be released with the Pelosi’s consent or leaked. And I can quite easily understand why placating you isn’t Nancy’s priority right now. Second, you can’t play both sides on this. You are who you say needs to be shut down. You are talking about yourself.

I think this is a perfect example of the current assault on democracy because it’s rooted in a fundamental refusal of one side to accept reality. I heard an example recently that you can’t have legitimate political discourse anymore when this happens. We can all disagree on solutions and policies and that’s fine, no matter whether a policy is good or bad we can talk about it. But where we used to have one side saying they want a traffic light on this road and one side saying they don’t, now we have one side saying they want a traffic light and the other side saying the road doesn’t exist. In this case we have the Pelosi’s, the SF PD, the Capitol PD and the suspect himself saying he broke into the Pelosi’s home to kidnap Nancy. It’s true. It happened. And the right say it’s faked. Or if it’s not faked he was Paul’s male hooker. Or if he wasn’t a hooker he was let in the house first then tried to break out. Or if it wasn’t that it was something else - because the only thing we know for sure is that what every single person involved says is the truth isn’t the truth. What do you do with that? How do you talk to that? Like with Epstein. There isn’t a Republican alive who hasn’t voted against prison reform, or any funding to stop them from turning into overcrowded, understaffed and under resourced hellscapes yet when an at risk prisoner is failed by chronically overworked staff who just don’t give a fuck anymore they’re shocked that the system doesn’t work perfectly and the only explanation must be a Clinton conspiracy. It’s utter bullshit.

Then why are you talking about the glass on the outside of the door? What were you suggesting if not that the break in was faked?