jakee

Yes, and you said that because you think it’s fitting for convicts to get shanked and it never even occurred to you that other people don’t. Just like you think it’s fitting for cops to cause grievous bodily harm to people in the street as a first resort.

50 days leaves a long time to figure out the exemptions.

When AggieDave used to post here he was fond of describing himself and his fellow police officers as sheepdogs protecting the sheep. I always had an issue with that - not only because it was arrogant as fuck, but also because everyone knows the primary job of a modern sheepdog is to control the flock, not to protect it. I don't think it's too much of a stretch to assume that those fine officers epitomise the sheepdog mentality.

See, this is exactly how I know you are happy that Chauvin, a convicted violent murderer, was shanked in prison.

But you would refuse to learn any lessons from them? Anytime WMDs are mentioned in future we MUST intervene?

Trump promised America First but instead joined a New World Order of corrupt fascist populist cronies prioritising scratching each other's backs over the wellbeing of their citizens. If only someone could have seen that coming.

I could actually get behind that. AI data centres are the fucking first horseman of the apocalypse as far as I'm concerned.

Congratulations - you've just annihilated the reasoning behind the entire Republican 'low tax good' economic platform that you voted for. If it's so simple, how come you've never realised it until right now? And wouldn't you be the first to call 'Marxism!' if a democrat said the same thing?

I am impressed that you fail to note that you've never once articulated a single reason why Harris was so bad. Not that it's at all surprising - you clearly prefer to go along with the groupthink rather than make any effort to analyse things yourself.

Trump was President for the Covid lockdowns.

But you voted for Trump, even after his first term showed you that meant getting a Royal Family.

Perfection. A felon voting for a felon because of his promise to get rid of all the criminals, and his illegal immigrant wife supporting that decision because of the promise to kick out all the illegals. And a million more stories like it across the nation. Go home America, you’re drunk.

The Republican government also falsely claimed there was evidence of a functioning WMD program in Iraq, which led to disaster.

Iran: Weeks away from a functioning warhead since 1995.

But you literally have lied about the circumstances of Floyd’s death. This is undeniable. Right, so why would you have thought that? I never said anything to suggest that, so is there any reason why you’d think that’s what I want, except that it is what you want to happen to convicts? Let’s check, you’ve said you want violent murderers to be executed, you’ve said you don’t want prison to be made easier, you’ve said you don’t want a cent to be spent on prison reform… so this is how you want convicts to live. You want prison to be a dangerous and unpleasant place and you’re totally happy with the idea that convicts will be shanked by other convicts. Now here’s the thing - Derek Chauvin is a convict. You may think he’s wrongly convicted, but they’re is not a second, special prison system for the wrongly convicted. They’re all just convicts. So you cannot escape the fact that how you want the prison system to treat guilty people - you know, the real scumbags who deserve whatever they get - that is exactly the same as how you want the prison system to treat innocent people who got a bad deal in court. You cannot kid yourself into thinking you can have it any other way.

Except, yet again, that's a blatant lie. You said you have no problem whatsoever with innocent prisoners being collateral damage in your lust for brutal justice. I don't think Chauvin should have to deal with being shanked in prison even though he's guilty. You think people like Chauvin should endure prison shankings even if they're innocent. You literally said it wouldn't even bother you if they killed him. I think reform doesn't have to cost a dime for most, for the violent murderers ...I'm a death penalty advocate, I'm An eye for an eye kind of guy and I understand that will leave some blind.

So you were completely wrong to make a blanket statement about ‘the left’? You acknowledge that you made a mistake and you retract everything you’ve said about it?

Yes, you've been making a point about bigotry, while displaying the same bigotry, and while saying that everyone else should stop talking about bigotry. It's a confusing message.

And yet it’s ok that you’re currently being bigoted against approximately half the population?

And you in this thread have chosen to be bigoted against a group because of their general political beliefs.

You said it should be whitewashed. You said it would help if everyone stopped looking for it and stopped pointing it out when they found it. Why are the rules only different when it’s your pet cause?

So you’d never make a sweeping statement like, oh I don’t know, “‘the left’ thinks it’s ok to hate Christians” because that would itself be a display of bigotry? Because it obviously would be, wouldn’t it?

Why are you taking about it? You said the solution to bigotry is to stop talking about bigotry. Why are you actively perpetuating anti-Christian bigotry? Unless you maybe think racism is a much simpler and less important problem, so the rules are different for them than they are for you.

Someone else you probably know recently said that the way to end anti-Christian hate is to stop talking about it. Since you obviously feel so strongly about the issue it’s odd that you’re choosing to harp on about it and be part of the problem when you could instead just shut up, ignore it and be part of the solution.

Hate? Really? As someone you probably know recently said, if you look at the world through a lens... But hey, maybe you're right. Maybe all the anti-black racism is just imaginary but the vicious bigotry against the poor oppressed christian majority is real. Y'know, maybe.