n23x

Fuck no it doesn't look like a bomb. This is just another look at how regoddamndiculous everyone is acting. What a bunch of vaginas, seriously. Lets see. Boston is next to the ocean. All those people eat fish. Fish can contain mercury. Mercury poisoning must be what's making these people so goddamn dumb. (my logic is about as flawless as theirs) We are not living in a "different time" now that 9/11 has long passed away, so anybody who wants to throw out comments like "common sense, or she should know better" is full of shit. I unfortunately have had to carry prototype electronics carryon, and each time TSA throws a shit fit, I've just never had guns pointed at me. Guess what Boston, if I was going to bomb a prime location, I wouldn't walk around with that shit hanging out, I'd hide it in everyday products so I could, I don't know, be discreet? And let me ad to this. She didn't say it was a bomb, nothing I've read even indicated that she did anything to suggest it was a bomb. So it's not really a fake bomb is it? What a bunch of boobs! There has to be something in the water over there... .jim edited: by the way 1969912, that is a rad name and occupation! "Don't touch my fucking Easter eggs, I'll be back monday." ~JTFC

It was a reasonable response to a poster who couldn't think of anything better than to say, "how dare you question the troops!" .jim "Don't touch my fucking Easter eggs, I'll be back monday." ~JTFC

Bill, How dare you oppose his appeal to emotion. Don't you know that's the most legitimate of the logical fallacies? I bet you think people named Muhammad are ok to. What a SOB. .jim "Don't touch my fucking Easter eggs, I'll be back monday." ~JTFC

No need. Honorable men know when they've been dishonest. Maybe you can just be his shoulder to cry on. .jim "Don't touch my fucking Easter eggs, I'll be back monday." ~JTFC

Why? General Petraeus was asked to generate an objective report on Iraq. The report he produced basically gave Bush BJ's, HJs, and ZJs with little legitimacy to the actual task at hand. Further, the ad has NOTHING to do with belittling our troops, it belittles a man who himself gave up on the troops by pushing more of them into this pointless war. heart, .jim "Don't touch my fucking Easter eggs, I'll be back monday." ~JTFC

Thank you. I'm reminded of the line from Superbad: Fogell: Well, It was between that or Muhammad. Seth: Why the f*** would it be between that or Muhammad. Why wouldn't you pick a normal f***in' name. Fogell: For your information, Muhammad is the most commonly used name on the planet. Read a book! .jim "Don't touch my fucking Easter eggs, I'll be back monday." ~JTFC

Oh, I do know the difference, thanks. You're right, the student does present some of his views as well as the views of some current authors, while structuring a few questions together. What part of that don't you understand? Further, Kerry's own response to the situation was as follows: So... the speaker, who was holding this Q&A session (which has absolutely zero similarity to a debate with regard to the actions of the participants. according to Willard), had no problem with the student posing the structured question. Maybe I'm the one that needs to speak a little slower. .jim "Don't touch my fucking Easter eggs, I'll be back monday." ~JTFC

Not that big of a difference. Nice try though. Regardless, I've seen equivalent outbursts from from congressman, presidential candidates, and even our fearless VP. Pot meet Kettle? Not according to Willard. .jim "Don't touch my fucking Easter eggs, I'll be back monday." ~JTFC

Out of curiousity, why don't you identify your pick for upcoming presidential candidate. I will then find video of your candidate: a.) exceeding the time allotted for them to speak, b.) talking out of turn, and c.) becoming agrivated or excited while speaking. Do you think I'll find additional video of them being arrested for this action? Do you think the 2 situations should have been handled similarly? As far as my original post being uncivilized, I was being facetious, as I expect were the people who identified this student as acting in an immature fashion "like all college students act". .jim "Don't touch my fucking Easter eggs, I'll be back monday." ~JTFC

Sorry to hurt your feelings. Unfortunately, increasing corruption from almost all positions of authority (particularly local policing forces) leads to higher disapproval when they do something wrong. If you are a good cop, be a good cop, and I'll have no reason to have anything but a respectful, polite interaction with you. If you are a bad cop, I will do my best to take away your job, and any sense of pride and respect you thought you had (or deserved). Fair enough? "Don't touch my fucking Easter eggs, I'll be back monday." ~JTFC

But no longer? Agreed, cops have an excess of power over civilians (at least in smaller numbers). Pigs will unlawfully use that power to attempt to sway matters which don't require their involvement. What we saw in that video blurred the lines between cops and pigs. .jim "Don't touch my fucking Easter eggs, I'll be back monday." ~JTFC

Face it, Q&A for any speaker provides the possibility that someone is going to ask a question you don't like, or that the question may not be as structured or spoken by a perfectly calm speaker. I will grant that the student seemed riled up, though not to the point that he should have been excused. Read Kerry's response to the situation: that he was attempting to respond to the question when the student was dragged off, and that he was dissatisfied that good strong dialogue was cutoff. When you become a LEO you need to grow some thick fucking skin. This is not a different time now that 9/11 has passed, just because someone gives you the stink eye or calls you gay (or a bull dyke like the girl cops obviously were) doesn't mean they need to be arrested. People do have a right to resist if the police are doing something that's out of line, though they might suffer consequences. To all of the people that suggest that the students speech was out of line, (as somebody suggested before) look at congress. These cops were far less out of line than that PIG in missouri, but still out of line. And finally, if the police wrong you, maybe you should wrong them back. edited to add: but no disrespect to the hot girl cops in golden that come sauntering into the Ace every night. Ladiesssssssssssss .jim "Don't touch my fucking Easter eggs, I'll be back monday." ~JTFC

There shouldn't be any incentives, nor any penalties. If you choose to eat mcdonalds every day, that's your perogative, and you choose to be a heap of shit (Yes, I mean that). Guess what, I can eat healthy meals every day for nearly the price I'd spend on mcdonalds or elsewhere, and I won't clog the toilet. Start realizing that for a majority of yourselves, you only have yourself to blame, and maybe, if you don't want that huge gut, you shouldn't be hitting the dingdongs so hard. Tough love, suck it up. What do you want, convienience, or health. It's not my choice, it's yours. edited: notice I'm not even addressing the bigotry which is obviously directed at a specific group: potentially being a fatass american is everyone's problem. .jim "Don't touch my fucking Easter eggs, I'll be back monday." ~JTFC

No, and yes, if they're rediculous enough. .jim "Don't touch my fucking Easter eggs, I'll be back monday." ~JTFC

Who gives a fuck because this poll was probably taken in in the middle of BFE nowhere kansas! They're not even real people! They probably filled out this poll somewhere in between bombing an abortion clinic, holding up signs that say "fags burn in hell", and then soliciting sex in the boys bathroom. Or were they just doing the "fred astaire"? .jim "Don't touch my fucking Easter eggs, I'll be back monday." ~JTFC

Luckily, we in the US haven't tried to convert people of other countries. Otherwise, this might seem sort of ironical! edited to add: or at least hypocritical of those that find great offense with OBL's call to convert .jim "Don't touch my fucking Easter eggs, I'll be back monday." ~JTFC

They are a ton of fun. One of the techs at my old job bought one and brought it into work. We used to do "timed laps" around the hangers late at night. It is about the most fun thing you can do, pads and helmet are definately recommended. (But if you're not a giant pussy you can also just wear jeans. ) .jim "Don't touch my fucking Easter eggs, I'll be back monday." ~JTFC

Holy shit, I had to zoom in on that picture because I wasn't sure that's what it was but look what's in grant's hand. .jim "Don't touch my fucking Easter eggs, I'll be back monday." ~JTFC

Almost all of our jumps are from 18k. MSL. .jim "Don't touch my fucking Easter eggs, I'll be back monday." ~JTFC

I literally just watched that movie last night. It's not terrible. .jim "Don't touch my fucking Easter eggs, I'll be back monday." ~JTFC

how so? As limited as it may be (or perceived to be ), good quantitative and qualitative data exists which leads us to concepts about the origin of the universe. There isn't much (or any, as far as I'm concerned) real data which says "god exists". If the agency I do research for (or a client I consult for) asks me why I made a specific selection, they want realistic, reliable, repeatable data to justify that choice. Not an "I think so, just because".

quite a bit, I'd say. .jim "Don't touch my fucking Easter eggs, I'll be back monday." ~JTFC

ah ha. But to the question of where the all knowing, all creating god came from? An answer that says, "just because" sounds even more foolish to me. More specifically, it sounds like a parent who doesn't know the answer and, regardless, wants to be right. .jim "Don't touch my fucking Easter eggs, I'll be back monday." ~JTFC

Looks like you have some competition: http://thepaincomics.com/weekly041229a.htm Is it really any different than what you claim? .jim "Don't touch my fucking Easter eggs, I'll be back monday." ~JTFC

Seriously? If it happens (or almost) all the time, I'd suggest its not just the other's people fault. You may benefit from defensive driving classes. I dont mean to insult you or anything, but I ride in traffic / commute 3 days of the week, and if you make a point of positioning yourself out of harms way, you diminish your risk, riding a bike, or driving a car. Same skills. Goddamn right, I could not agree anymore. Being a defensive (and offensive) driver can provide the required visibility to other drivers on the road. Unfortunately, my only near serious incident was prevented out of shear luck more than anything else (just happened to knock it in first while sitting behind a car at a stop-light, and was able to jump on the median after some bitch in her suburban screeched to a halt a foot away from the bumper of the car i was behind). It would have been an over, under, or in between. .jim "Don't touch my fucking Easter eggs, I'll be back monday." ~JTFC