-
Content
5,360 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Feedback
0%
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Dropzones
Gear
Articles
Fatalities
Stolen
Indoor
Help
Downloads
Gallery
Blogs
Store
Videos
Classifieds
Everything posted by Conundrum
-
Editing RAW is easy. just open the image and play around with levels, curves, color balance, filters, etc. Just like you would with a .jpeg
-
Some good captures in there but the photos could use some post processing. They seem really grainy. What are you shooting with?
-
This is a trick question, right? Right?
-
Tell him if he doesn't tell her, you will. What a bastard.
-
Oh jesus christ. Seriously? pffft.
-
For this particular subject? Not that I see, no. Can you point something out?
-
What is followed and what is perscribed is two different things Absolutely, which is the biggest reason I do not agree with the YES vote. People like to pick and choose what they feel like following in order to satisfy their needs and wants - which I think is silly.
-
Doesn't the bible also say things like wives must obey their husbands, and they're suppose to be the husbands helper? I don't recall seeing religious people up in arms when we stopped following that crock of shit. I think it also talks about premarital sex and the like - not many people follow that either.
-
Can you give me said definition?
-
Hmm, If someone has the same rights I would see it as the same as far as the law goes. But I have a hard time understanding why someone would care? (really I dont) If someone really thinks about it there is only one reason to call it marriage today. I mean if gays are giving the same legal standing (as I have stated I think they should have) why is it so important to call it marriage? In todays climate regarding those of religion, and if you take the time to think about it, the reason will show itself. And if the reason I am thinking of is the only reason, who is the one (group) being unreasonable or doing the attacking of something that has existed for centuries? I see where you are coming from, but it still is not answering the question I have been asking throughout the entire post; and that is: Why is marriage considered only between a man and a woman. (I know you said you don't know already).
-
I know, but I felt like answering.
-
Even when protesting/picketing at abortion clinics? yes.
-
Gays being able to marry or not makes no difference to me, I am just trying to get some sort of logical answer as to WHY religious oppose same sex marriage so much. Not just a "because it's reserved for man and woman" but WHY it's for man and woman only. I can't seem to get a straight answer (no pun intended). That said, and to answer your question, I would not have a "problem" per se, but I would not agree with not calling it marriage. Saying you're the same, but refusing to give the same name, isn't really the same is it?
-
Religion does not answer to logic. Your question is without meaning. Why?
-
I really don't understand what you just said and what you mean.
-
Gay couples are not "recognizes" as couples in the religions I know of. As to what equality is that you refer to I dont know. So, I do not feel the question you asked I can answer directly but I hope this helps you understand my position Ok let me rephrase then. Why are gay couples not "recognized" in religion like a straight couple? I cant say I know but, I suspect that because of the need to reproduce man and woman unions were recognized and defined. Its a really old book. You have stated that because of lawyers (and the shit some of them pull) marrige should be the norm in these cases. IF those concerns were handled, would you be ok with civil unions? If not, why? So marriage was defined "man and woman" because of the need to reproduce? What about straight couples who can't have kids? Should they be allowed to get married? And where did I say anything about lawyers and what they do?
-
Gay couples are not "recognizes" as couples in the religions I know of. As to what equality is that you refer to I dont know. So, I do not feel the question you asked I can answer directly but I hope this helps you understand my position Ok let me rephrase then. Why are gay couples not "recognized" in religion like a straight couple?
-
Can you please answer this question? Why are gay couples not considered equal (or "ok) in religion?
-
Silly question to ask an atheist. I'm asking anyone who votes YES on prop 8 because of religious reasons.
-
Being able to say they're "married".
-
"I am a perfect physical and mental specimen, therefore anybody who wants to be touched by my perfection must also be physically and mentally perfect. If they are in any way different than I am, they are obviously defective and will be allowed in my perfect presence only for a short period of time so that I can later insult them whilst amongst my equally perfect acquaintances." Excellent!! It's not about perfectness, it's about preference.
-
I said body hair, meaning, below the head. I see, I see. So facial hair is ok then? Sure.
-
I said body hair, meaning, below the head.
-
Are you a lesbian? (serious question) Or are you an OB/GYN? I am bi-sexual.