airdvr

I think the headline incites anarchy

Too bad it's behind a paywall for me.

Care to enlighten the uninformed perfersser?

She didn't have to say it...she lived it. And she still couldn't win. Brazile sums it up near the end: “If the fight had been fair, one campaign would not have control of the party before the voters had decided which one they wanted to lead. This was not a criminal act, but as I saw it, it compromised the party’s integrity.”

It really is a shame. Nearly everyone who saw the video knew it was wrong and sympathized with the protesters until it turned to looting. They wasted a good opportunity.

Please show me where I quote Hitler as usual.

“The Prime Minister personally urged the French and US leaders to block publication of the captured German telegrams after the war,” the Telegraph reported, “fearing they would ‘give pain to the Duke.’ While he dismissed the documents as “ ‘German intrigues,’ he feared they might cast doubt on the Duke’s loyalty.”

You mean like this type of leadership John? “The Prime Minister personally urged the French and US leaders to block publication of the captured German telegrams after the war,” the Telegraph reported, “fearing they would ‘give pain to the Duke.’ While he dismissed the documents as “ ‘German intrigues,’ he feared they might cast doubt on the Duke’s loyalty.”

Bankruptcy has always been a part of business. It's there for a reason.

Being that you know all of that what have the dems been doing for the last 55 years?

I guess I don't understand how that could be if the dems have been doing such a great job since 1965.

That's odd, considering how well they've been taken care of by the Dems since 1965.

If you recall social distancing, mask use etc...was only to flatten the curve. We knew there would be many deaths. I know that doesn't fit your TDS story so now it's all about how many are dead.

Seriously Brent, I don't understand why you continue to push this here. It's a complete waste of bandwidth. The science is settled and the future is green. Time to move on.

I don't know. Especially considering that over the last 50 years the Democratic party has always taken such good care of them.

While that may be true it also follows that, with freedom comes responsibility. Free peoples don't always obey the laws.

Doesn't mean I condone the actions.

Fascinating.

What exactly was your hope Phil?

Phil seems a bit upset. It must have struck a chord (get it?) with Dr. John.

With whom are you upset?

I must be living in your head rent free. Still hasn't even begun to equal 2008-9.

My mistake...not death but GBS. Guillain-Barré Syndrome What NIIP did not and could not survive, however, was the second blow, finding cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) among persons receiving swine flu immunizations. As of 1976, >50 "antecedent events" had been identified in temporal relationship to GBS, events that were considered as possible factors in its cause. The list included viral infections, injections, and "being struck by lightning." Whether or not any of the antecedents had a causal relationship to GBS was, and remains, unclear. When cases of GBS were identified among recipients of the swine flu vaccines, they were, of course, well covered by the press. Because GBS cases are always present in the population, the necessary public health questions concerning the cases among vaccine recipients were "Is the number of cases of GBS among vaccine recipients higher than would be expected? And if so, are the increased cases the result of increased surveillance or a true increase?" Leading epidemiologists debated these points, but the consensus, based on the intensified surveillance for GBS (and other conditions) in recipients of the vaccines, was that the number of cases of GBS appeared to be an excess.