airdvr

Members
  • Content

    10,576
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7
  • Feedback

    0%
  • Country

    United States

Everything posted by airdvr

  1. You don't honestly believe I would murder someone do you? My plan is to scare the hell out of them. Double barrel shotguns can have that effect.
  2. When did I say In would murder people?
  3. I don't have to pay my defense. If I cannot afford a lawyer....
  4. Indeed. Cops have been doing stupid shit during this. I saw a vid where one was arresting a looter and was kneeling on his neck. You would think at this point there might have been some inter department memo stating they shouldn't do that.
  5. So in that vein I should just let people destroy what I've worked for? Because I have insurance? Would you wait until your AAD fires too? What if I was financially over burdened by C19 and didn't have the funds to pay my premiums? Still feel the same way?
  6. No...it's me saying if you want to hold up an image of something you need to take into account the complete story. He needed to throw in a big dose of caution. Unfortunately he didn't and wound up dead.
  7. I just love when people use MLK as an example...his methods didn't turn out all that well for him.
  8. NO. But I can feel as if my life were in danger.
  9. So we should apply the rule of law to me but ignore those who are breaking it? You don't see the problem there?
  10. Stop! You're arguing with a man who believes he is intelligent enough to know everyone's intentions.
  11. Why don't you tell me? I'm not playing your fucked up Q and A game.
  12. I'm not angry and frightened...I'm concerned.
  13. Hmmm...I wonder why I would think in terms of violence right now...
  14. If anarchy meant protecting my livelihood then I guess so.
  15. That would be promoting the consequences of violently destroying property and risking people's lives. I can assure you if my business was one that was in danger I'd be there ready to shoot those who are intent on the destruction. I have no problem with Trump's statement.
  16. Yes John...I'm quite sure the two headlines would be different. One of them only has 3 words. The other has nine.
  17. That would be an entirely different headline. The headline would need to be "Nixon must be removed. So must his congressional enablers". I'm not suggesting the writer is promoting anarchy, I'm suggesting the publication consciously used that headline to trigger.
  18. So you can assume the intentions of some but not others? Interesting...
  19. I said it's possible...now I think it's probable. It's a headline designed to grab the reader's attention. Happens all the time. My first reaction was "is Will advocating anarchy?"
  20. Never said that he was however, it is possible that WaPo used that headline on purpose. I've always enjoyed Will. His intelligent analysis is one I have come to respect.