pajarito

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content

    4,872

  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by pajarito

  1. pajarito

    guy help

    pajarito replied to happythoughts's topic in The Bonfire

    You say that like it's a bad thing! Not at all. I think everybody needs to shave their balls and wear a cock ring.
  2. pajarito

    guy help

    pajarito replied to happythoughts's topic in The Bonfire

    What is that ring around the base? You'd look like you were walking around at the office all day with a cock ring on!
  3. pajarito
    I just can't help it! Damnit!!! Can't stop.
  4. pajarito
    Just because there are two people who break the law and only one of them gets caught doesn't mean that the person who got caught isn't guilty.
  5. pajarito
    Sounds like the Democrat philosophy this election year.
  6. pajarito
    Perfect! What was so hard to understand in the first place? Broadcast media is regulated. Don't like it? Spew your shit someplace else. He can push as much crap as he wants to now. God bless America!
  7. pajarito
    Hey Nigel99, I've got some real cool beachfront property in Tennessee that you might be interested in buying. Cheap! Just let me know. Tell your friends who believe that shit above.
  8. pajarito
    Necessary evil. Although they've shown themselves (UN) to be incredibly fucked up in so many ways over the years, they are still viewed by the civilized world as being the concensus of world opinion. However, when they demonstrate weakness and show that they have no influence for enforcement to back up their mandates, actions have to be taken. It reminds me of the phrase I was always so accustomed to hearing, "Lead, follow, or get the hell out of the way!"
  9. pajarito
    The inspectors agree that there are no stockpiles. Even according to the UN, there was not a verifiable accounting of their destruction, which was required by the UN... The UN inspectors could not account for where they went... they say the destroyed them, but with SH's track record, should we have taken his word? We now know their not there, but we may not have know that otherwise... Fuckin' "A" Bubba! Exactly! This was a real shit bag (to use some colorful Peaceful Jeffrey terminology) that we were dealing with. Correction: The world was dealing with.
  10. pajarito
    Nothing's changed as far as the Middle East hatred of the US despite the invasion of Iraq. They hate us as much as they ever did. I know some want to say that we've just stirred up a hornets nest and that we're in more danger because of it. I say we're in just as much danger as before and the proper course of action is to hit them before they hit us. One more brutal dictator bites the dust. Bonus: Kadafi relinquished his WMD. How about that? Show some backbone – get some results.
  11. pajarito
    Is it? The organization that you tout as being the authority for international law? Credibility?
  12. pajarito
    Whoa... "Get some!" Until we get locked...
  13. pajarito
    QuoteNot even the exaggerated intel claimed that Saddam had Intercontinential ballistic missiles. There was absolutely NO evidence or intel that he had such capabilities. The banned SCUD missiles where not ICBM's either? For that matter how many countries even possess ICBM capabilities? Possibly only you and Russia - I am not even sure that the UK has the means?Quote Harbored terrorists. Provided financial support. Clearly demonstrated would use chemical weapons. Reputation clearly suggests would share with terrorists (i.e. WMD proliferation) Clearly hated the US and allies. 12 years of not complying with many UN resolutions.
  14. pajarito
    And now the UN is implicated in a massive "Oil for Food" scandal. Conflict of interest?
  15. pajarito
    That’s pretty silly. Yes, I agree that SH tried to kill GWB’s Dad. You have not proof whatsoever that it was the reason he went to war. I’m sure it affected SH’s likeability on GWB’s part but your opinion here is just plain and simple “Bush Bashing” hatred. Our CIA obviously had conflicting information which they presented as true as did other intelligence agencies abroad. We weren’t the only ones and certainly not Bush or his administration alone, who thought that WMD was there. You can’t accurately say that the CIA was completely against it.
  16. pajarito
    The weapons inspectors were not being allowed to properly do their job. They were kicked out for a number of years before. They were also not allowed to go anywhere they wanted to. AND THEY HAD 12 YEARS TO TRY. Consulting you on issues like that would be a much more dangerous choice on my part than even voting Kerry into the Presidency. If you think I'm a radical, you're hanging by the fingernails of your one hand off the left side of the diving board. As for who's wrong, most everybody at that level was also. In the end, a very good deed for the world was done and we are safer because of it.
  17. pajarito
    No one knew exactly what he had until we invaded and saw for ourselves. That's the whole point. It wasn't made clear by Saddam to the international community and wasn't going to be.
  18. pajarito
    If I, as an SF team leader, authorize my troops to use deadly force because the situation is such that we all agree it is required, I am also responsible for them acting on that authorization. If they use deadly force, I can't then come back, point my finger at them, and say it's all their fault. Unless, they break the rules of war. I don't think the President has been found to have done that in regard to using the authorization that was given him. I think it is shameful to try and hang him over what even John Kerry himself said was necessary. It is the last resort. I think 12 years to comply was adequate. I think any reasonable person would.
  19. pajarito
    You don't know that. How on earth would you? Those that had the info concerning this, including Kerry, decided otherwise. Nice patriotic view you have of your own country. "Totally shameful."
  20. pajarito
    You have no proof of that assertion. Sounds like just more "Bush Bashing" hatred.
  21. pajarito
    Someone as intelligent as you must be, professor, has got to recognize that international terrorism is not limited to what happened on 9-11. Do you think that one attack against one terrorist in retaliation for what happened here is going to protect us in the future? I don't.
  22. pajarito
    Gross incompetence is yet another greatly exaggerated term you guys are using to describe a decision that was agreed upon by both sides including the intelligence community here and abroad. I think it shows panic.
  23. pajarito
    I know you'd probably like to be included in national security decisions of that magnitude but you aren't. Those that do were elected into office to represent you and they decided otherwise. I say again…the guy you’re going to elect into office voted for the war. Like ChasingBlueSky said, he then voted against it. You’re going to try and elect and pretty level headed guy into office there Kallend.
  24. pajarito
    I know you're from England but I'll bet you're all for that "Global Test" of Kerry's that you must meet before you can take measures to protect your country.
  25. pajarito
    Didn't have to. You did. Good luck with your choice of persons with character and backbone for your Commander-in-chief.