olofscience

What, giving up so easily? Just because I can google more record warm areas in December than record cold ones? Now you're saying it's just weather? So by your own admission your own argument was crap. Thanks for playing.

Is that the whole of Alaska? No. Here's more: https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/nation/alaska-hits-record-high-temperature-for-december/ https://gizmodo.com/alaska-broke-its-all-time-december-heat-records-1848277124 https://en.brinkwire.com/science/alaska-set-monthly-heat-records-in-december/ https://uk.news.yahoo.com/67-degrees-in-alaska-climate-change-continues-to-topple-temperature-records-193405514.html How about Louisiana: https://www.wafb.com/2021/12/27/record-warm-end-december/ North Carolina: https://www.wral.com/where-is-winter-it-s-been-one-of-the-warmest-decembers-on-record-in-the-triangle/20052344/ Miami: https://www.whio.com/weather/record-warmth-end-december/ZYST4C5VKVGCDA3AH2DIBOT3NE/ Texas and neighbouring parts: https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2021/12/20/Christmas-weather-heat/3091640031450/ https://www.kbtx.com/2021/12/26/will-this-december-be-brazos-valleys-warmest-record/ Tennessee: https://www.wreg.com/weather/december-2021-is-hottest-yet-for-memphis/

Not in Alaska: Alaska experiences record-high temperature for December, freezing rain See, we can play the cherry-picking game too!

but here you are...arguing (and failing)

This is because you can't argue against people in 2021. You need to bring in old imaginary opponents...

Source?

In other news, brent still salty over being found out that he can't understand titles of scientific papers

I'll pre-write the brent template since it's what he will post in a few weeks anyway: of course, clicking the link will show the NOAA thinks it's pretty bad, but when has that ever stopped the troll?

you haven't shown anything, you never have. Just going to be another link to the NOAA summary (wildly misinterpreting it) or dodgy denier website with an unsourced declaration of rightness.

Thing is, to extend the liquid hydrocarbon fuel network, you need pipes, pumps, tanks, valves. To extend the electric charging network, you basically need a wire. It's a lot easier. (I know I know, wires are the analogs of pipes, voltage sources are pumps, battery packs/capacitors are tanks, and transistors/relays are valves...but in the electric case, you have zero moving parts)

So...what's the official NOAA position on climate change? You're not using their data, because you have absolutely no capability to analyse it. All you're doing is extreme cherry-picking from the articles they write from their analysis of their own data, and you don't even understand what they write. So, nice try. This pathetic attempt to ride on the NOAA's coattails has no effect on your argument one bit, because they're not on your side.

Here's your full post: It's good that you still get a good laugh, incoherent as you may be.

It's really sad you don't see it...

That has absolutely nothing to do with food production. Losing track of the discussion, are we?

According to Brent, China's progress is entirely due to burning coal right? Nothing to do at all with things like, WTO membership or anything like that. If only the US burned more coal, then surely it would become Great Again(TM). That's the only thing holding you back... /s

Burden of proof is on the one who makes the claim. Also, you can't prove a negative, but it's already clear you didn't remotely get to logic class because of failing so many levels below it.

...by which you mean a random blog post or article on the internet right?

Until it comes to food production - then all of a sudden the effect is massive, right brent?

Crap, that's actually hotter than some predictions - in particular the article I posted from December last year predicted it would be 6th due to the La Niña.

Actually, it's STILL used as a rocket fuel. In the current days.

Mods, this needs a BIG danger disclaimer as bigun has also done. Do not inhale hydrogen peroxide, people.

How long do schoolchildren spend studying percentages?

This is an interesting comment from brent, when it's one of his oldest strategies. He's actually just done it a few minutes ago...

Nice strawman. It's nice when you have to make up my arguments to deflect from how yours have fallen flat.

The prediction I linked (here) not only predicted the trend, but the actual rank in terms of temperature (6th) of 2021 so accurately, so I wouldn't call that falling flat. Your argument did, though. (as well as many of your other predictions here) Oh, and you really wouldn't understand. Because it's really beyond your reasoning ability, but also because you do it on purpose. Weird how that works, right?