Botellines

Although I wouldn't like it in any way - I would understand it - It's called Big Picture. No, if anyone raped your son, you would kill the beast that did it. And if you saw your neighbourg´s son get raped, you would do everything you could to protect yours. If not, sorry, you don´t deserve to have any kids.

Of course, my friend. We both know that the important thing in the pub is to be able to bring your toys in. I have seen some fights in Opium (cow gate, Edinburgh) and man, was i glad no one had a gun!!!

Alcohol + heavy machinery = dangerous Alcohol + driving = dangerous Alcohol + firearms = dangerous I hope no one challenge that. Even if the drunk person shoots on self defense, will his aim be good enough to blow the bad guy´s head up and not any innocent person´s head?

Dude, i didn´t know you were so sensitive. I apologize if i ever hurt your feelings. I wouldn´t ever forgive myself if i make you cry with one of my posts You seem overly sensitive to personal attacks if and only if you are not who do the attacking.

Any link that proves that?

Fair enough. You are right about how long it would take to visit all the U.S. However, if you choose not to travel to other countries, you are in no position to make comparison about the U.S and the rest of the world. I have the feeling that in this forums there is too many people who has not travel enough and compares the US with other countries way too much. Not directed at you, by the way.

If his passport is so stamped it is thick as a book, most likely (I could be wrong though) he has not spend much time in any of those places. Maybe that's because it quickly became apparent that being in those places sucked compared to being in America. - Have you ever left the U.S.A? I am not talking about going on vacations with mammy and daddy down to mexico. I am talking about living for a period of time outside your country. Honest question, BTW.

I think that the woman has the last word on the issue. I do believe though that the woman should listen and take into consideration what her partner has to say (married or unmarried). However, what about if the woman wants to have the kid but the man doesn´t want to. Should the man have to pay for the next eighteen years? I think that yes to some extent, but if so, it is quite unfair that men has no word one way or the other. Also, we would be making life easier to condom biters men hunters women. Any thoughts?

WTF!!!! This thread should not be here!!! Everybody agrees!!! I am about to agree with PeacefulJeffrey! Someone move it to Bonfire, quickly.... Edited to stop people from taking the piss about my spelling

Sorry to hijack, but it reminded me of a good joke. What is a 68? You give me head, and I owe you one.

Well, natural birth control (AKA coitus interruptus) is some form of cheating. According to catholic religion sex is the mean of human reproduction. Ask your priest what he thinks of having sex with your wife and pull out at the last moment only to come on her tammy. He may not find it very catholic.

Could you post a definition of socialism that directly or indirectly implies a disregard for civil rights? What do you understand for civil rights?

If his passport is so stamped it is thick as a book, most likely (I could be wrong though) he has not spend much time in any of those places. I have heard that saying many, many times from people from diferent countries. It may hold true for you, but it is false for me, however, the saying there is Spain, and there is anywhere else, is a fact (for me at least, although probably not for you) Anyway, i never really understood that saying quite well, is it saying that the country being spoken about is good or just different?

Well, you know how it goes, if it is not in video, it never happened. It sounds like they are expecting to have high collateral damage, so much for winning the iraki people´s hearts

It is very sad.

Why not releasing any videos is good for Kerry? We agree that play dead is good for bush. I said about the videos only because it seems everytime Bush gives OBL for dead, he release a new video saying he is not.

And add on top of that a promise to play dead and not release anymore videos until election time.

LMAO.... Dude, so much for your credibility. Thanks JackC I needed the laugh.

If the only thing you can do is make fun of my not perfect knowledge of a SECOND language, i am very sorry for you. You need to get laid. By the way, it is really NOT necesary that you answer every post i write, especially if it is not about you. If you really can not forget about me, please DO add something intelligent to the thread (or at least copy-paste someone else´s post) By the way, unless "t" is a contraction of "to", you didn´t spell check either. As i said: dude, get a life.

I will take that as a cumplimet. At least, you say you are not sure.

I couldn´t have explained it better. It is the same in Spain than in California.

I get it now!!! PeacefulJeffrey and Juanesky are the same person. I am going to create another user that after i post will say how wise i am, how sexy i look and how ugly all of you are.

That´s it. Let´s not restrict, ban or regulate anything. Good idea. Let´s sell hand grenades to your crazy neighbour, let´s sell alcohol to a 12 years old guy. Let´s lower the age of consent, better, let´s forget about the idea of age of consent, that way we get rid of the concept of paedophilia. . Anything else you want to unrestrict, unregulate or permit in any manner? Now that we agree that some sort of regulation is necesary (Even the constitution is some form of regulation), We can discuss where we put the limit. My opinion is that 18 is right. 21 is too much, a bit ridiculous that you are old enough to die for your country but you can drink a beer. However, if the law prohibits consumption of alcohol to people under 18 and it is proven that 18 years old people buy drinks for underage people i don´t see a bad idea to make it harder to buy alcohol (harder, not impossible) to those people.

One more time. That a law or idea do not solve ALL the problem, doesn´t mean that it will not solve MOST of the problem or even PART of the problem.

Botellines, nice to met you. No, I am not. That would be a personal attack and as you should know it is not allowed. I am just saying that in some threads you prefer safety over freedom and in other threads you prefer freedom over safety. However you say: You NEVER give up rights for a promise of safety. Better to live without safety than without rights What is the right word?, ummm, let me think.... yeah, it is FLIP FLOP Well, I can´t believe that you can´t believe that I believe what i say. Although you think that you know everything and that you are always right (and i am sorry for being so brutally honest), the fact is that you are often wrong. There is a lot of people in this forum that make points about diferent subjects without being so agressive. (No, i am not one of them). Particularly regarding gun control. No side has ever been able to prove anything, so, please do enlighten us and tell us why you think you are beyong any doubt right. HINT: read the whole thread firsts and specially mcrocket posts.