juanesky

Members
  • Content

    4,842
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by juanesky

  1. Yes indeed, but then on the other end, you have no objections to having pedophiles near children. It's an irony isn't it? "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon
  2. Yes I can see it, and the irony is that they don'[t get tough with Kerry as they do with GWB.... Kerry has GREAT plans that no one really asks him in detail. "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon
  3. And where are all the Kerry lovers when need? "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon
  4. Because apparently after the use of cheap psychology, (or some of the liberal PC crap)you are only allow to "assess" the situation after your skull has been fractured and your face smashed. It is your obligation to keep it cool and not think you might still be endangered. No, we must respect the right of the scumbag to do as he pleases just to keep these people satisfied. To hell with self defence.... "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon
  5. The direct connection is quite clear. GWB said exactly that any country, govt, etc that would aid in any way these ignorant and hateful people (I got a better term for them) would be in peril of military confrontation with the US. No more bs will be taken. Everyone in the country at the time agreed. I still remember how powerless and lost we all felt that day (even our foreign friends). And thought how hard a time this is to face such a reality. For once we stopped beIng a bi-partisan society, and families, friends, groups got closer, we started reaching out and seeking to help each other. How easy do we forget. GWB in the meantime, was explicit, he named Iraq, NK, Afghanistan, Iran et all the rest, as the"axis of evil". Everyone seemed to agree at the time. He simply kept his promise. Didn't he? Look at some of the positive consequences, Pakistan helping out, Lybia opening its borders and releasing the culprits of lockerbie, Jordan and Syria getting in line.....etc. Another positive aspect has been to show us who are our real allies. If you think that he was not a threat, then I don't know if we are either looking at different things at the same time, or you just would have preferred to: 1) Give SH the benefit of the doubt (unequivocally proven to be a demented liar, assassin, an overall evil man), 2 )Assume GWB was just lying in a complex conspiracy theory to benefit himself and his close associates (in a very open information society as opposed to SH). 3) Hope that the current president is doing what he can to protect us, he is after all in office because he was elected, and pledged an oath in accordance to these duties. I chose the latter, thank you. Bad consequences, there are a lot, mainly war. War is never good, nor is the killing of any human being. As a catholic I don't find anything more abhorrent than the need to kill a fellow human being in order to protect (as in defend) my family. It could have been them in any of the explosions world wide that continue to take place due to those animals. If any of them would have died, I would never called them "martyrs", they would have been innocent victims. They did what they did and hence have convinced me without no doubt (outside any political affiliation influence) that they will do anything possible albeit their own deaths, to destroy life as I know it. You may well ask, the difference between a US soldier and a terrorist, there are many. Few of these are: We do not seek to kill innocents, nor shield with them. We also want to come back, alive, in one piece to fulfill the rest of our planned and not so planned lives. We are not seeking martyrdom. We think that this is a time to make a stand in a very difficult time. We want to seek those 72 virgins while we have blood pumping in our veins....(an other places to). Blue skies and safe swoops. "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon
  6. And I think Michael Moore and others feel that they have been lied to by people far more powerful and with far more consequence -- GWB for instance. I know that I really don't worry too much if someone is caught in a bit of a lie and it cost me the price of a movie ticket. I usually get a little more pissed off when a lie may have caused thousands of innocent deaths, the deaths of hundreds of US servicemen and possibly the source of further terrorism in the world. If you're pissed at Michael Moore instead of GWB, then I suggest to you that perhaps you worry about the wrong things. More people have died due to the LACK of response of the previous government. Go ahead, tally the numbers if you like. US service men and woman are prepared to give their lives as prescribed in the code of conduct, article I. We know there are threats out there, they did not come to us just after GWB was in office, it was simmering for a long time before he came around. "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon
  7. Paul, it is very interesting that you rank MM with Galileo, who as opposed as MM, came up with a result based on FACTS, and through prudent, patient and studious observation of his hypothesis. MM simply counts on people that will take his movie as a "documentary" to pursue his agenda and is not even man enough to dispel this notion on his own, and come clean. Hey, for that matter there are a lot of bullshitters in this world that can revolutionize the whole world based on simply personal fallacies. Most opposed to his views are simply upset by the aforementioned reason. Is this hard to understand at all? "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon
  8. Really? Well thanks, since without those news I would not have been able to tell...... I can't believe it's a LIE "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon
  9. I agree with Clint. It is disrespectful. "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon
  10. Is that a new verb or is it missing an "S"? "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon
  11. Good catch. However omiting one word is not the same as to the bad taste solicitation of an honest answer in a rather innapropiate manner (TROLL) and then backpedaling or trying to hide it, very poorly indeed. "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon
  12. Yes, that is his modus operandi. Reminds me of MM somehow. "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon
  13. Ok, seems that you are missing the connotation of your own title. When you use captioned words means Screaming, yelling. "you WAR MONGER!!!" Implies that you are pretty much upset and somehow pretended to insult people who are backing up the war effort. It is not the words in itself but the manner which you have address them. PS, we are actually doing something about AQ and all those nice people who try to kill us, not running away and going home with the tail between our legs like others. "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon
  14. Maybe that books needs editing. This guy is someone's yard at night trying to steal, the homeowner looks out sees something strange from the guy, and simply shoots the intrude because he feared that he was in danger. Maybe you are not looking at the possibility that the homeowner was where he is supposed to be safe, and the thief was simply not. Have you considered that option at all? "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon
  15. Yes, indeed. I think it is time someone just takes the shoe of their mouth "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon
  16. They said a joke about difference between pussy and cunt.. "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon
  17. When you are down, don't forget the reason you joined. It can be tough going through boot camp. The objective is you learn the Navy ways. Just make sure you read your contract throughly, emphasis on your rate, or as to where your rate will be specified (rate= your specialty). "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon
  18. Many advices, but don't forget regardless how many jumps you have, don't assume you know everything. Keep on learning. Blue skies and congrats! "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon
  19. Absolutely. We should always be concerned as why things happen in our sport. Finding out it could be human or mechanical errors is always appreciated and eye openers. "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon
  20. Are you going active or reserve? The age in the navy was raised almost 2 years ago to 38.BTW "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon
  21. English is not easy... Three men, an Italian, a French and a Latin American went for a job interview in England. Before the interview, they were told that they must compose a sentence in English with three main words: green, pink and yellow. The Italian was first one: When I wake up in the morning, I see the yellow sun and the green grass and I think to myself: "I hope it will be a pink day." The French was next: "When I wake up in the morning I eat a yellow banana with a green pepper and in the evening I watch the Pink Panther on TV." Last was the Latin American: "When I wake up in the morning, I hear the phone "green... green..." and I pink up the phone and I say "Yellow?" "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon
  22. . Yes, by making another movie with more "truths", what a great sacrifice "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon
  23. . "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon
  24. . "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon
  25. . Well, so much for contradictions aren't we? you care, and don't care, which is it? BTW shitting the paella joke was to explain you what he meant in the first post where you imply he is personally attacking you, while he is actually on your side. I did come up with my own joke, which is "el colmo de un zapatero", while you have on previous threads have already remarked bush as "arbustito". Giving you the same is not funny to you?. Too bad things appear to fly by you, Maybe it is an issue of language barrier. You can ask for help anytime. "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon