dmcoco84

WTF are you talking about...? Irrational Gibberish...

Exactly.

No, Sir... I take people at their word. Amazon is a raging Progressive and we agree on very little... but even she and I agree on Israel, and the FACT that all the current rulers in all the countries in the 6 day war, along with Iran, Lebanon, SA, and the majority of the people in every one of those countries... still want Israel wiped from the map. Just because you don't want to listen, doesn't mean they aren't saying it loud and clear. You are delusional and ignorant if you deny that. Note: And because of that delusion, we should take away your guns.

You are in your own little world... And this specifically, is ridiculous:

You are so full of shit. Lets see... Assad - AQ - and Israel AQ Syrian Rebels win; they hate Israel, desire and willing to kill every last Jew. Assad wins; he hates Israel, desire and willing to kill every last Jew. Israel... has a right to exist; Kicks Ass Every Time, that they are attacked, threatened, or have to prevent attack.

None. Period. Full stop. So, take away my semi-auto rifle... ...and trade it for a full auto ak-47/74 (made in any number of the countries who voted down the UN Bill recently), which I'll be forced to purchase in the black market, if I want a rifle. Your logic is spot on, Quade!

Significantly higher. And MS-13 style killings would skyrocket.

Except when there is a direct DESIRE to help the Muslim Brotherhood. Obama and Recep are buddies... and Recep hates Assad; it's personal. Connect the dots...

PS... Fuck Mark Kelly. Feel horrible for his (Progressive) wife... ...and since then, have lost any level of respect for him.

If what you are trying to explain, IS, the truthful desire... A SINGLE page bill could fix this... But lets speak honestly, Bill. Quade... wants a panel of experts. You (may want this too), within knowing all the other arguments to date are lost, are sticking with BGCs. You... want any sale of a firearm, by anyone, at any time, of any kind, to be put through a background check (checking for felony convictions and mental adjudication). And like with panels of experts... its not going to happen. And it is not because of the NRA. All Congress (those members who want more laws) would need to do is write a one page bill... clear and simple language, and any issues regarding gun shows, would be solved. But that is not what Progressives want... they want power and control. Its that simple... so enough with the 90% and all the BS you keep posting, like the above, from "Pro-Gun Supporters". Speak the truth, first... ...which is not happening. Only through manipulative means are any actions being pursued currently.

Fair enough, but then how do you feel about lying fuckers who don't want to subvert constitutional rights? Sigh...

But the way to beat them is through education and awareness of the Cancer that is... Progressivism. http://www.amazon.com/American-Progressivism-ronald-william-pestritto/dp/0739123041/ref=tmm_pap_title_0?ie=UTF8&qid=1367015410&sr=1-1

Redefining... is the name of the game for Progressives. The Little Blue Book http://www.amazon.com/The-Little-Blue-Book-ebook/dp/B007WT31BM "Just change the wording"... Progressives are Cowards... because if they speak the truth about their desires, their ideas are rejected.

Funny stuff. That Pro-Gun Supporter, sounds equally as stupid as the "Hunter" in the Bloomberg ad. I bet this person did the interview with their finger on the trigger as well.

If you had to... I would instead use something like, the "Brady Effect". Brady Effect... the making of completely irrational decisions based purely on emotion.

Just to digress a sec, the fairly frequent use of that vaguely mocking term is going to be viewed as rhetorical chickenshit - a sort of thinly-veiled name-calling - by the large number of as-yet undecided moderates and fence-sitters. Bad form and counter-productive, and (IMO) beneath someone like yourself, who is blessed with intelligence and the ability to articulate well. Just a little coaching; and you don't even have to cover my slot. I would have to agree, in a broad sense. Doesn't at all help the case of those who desire maximum freedom. Defeating an argument with logical and reason is far more effective. Call them what they ARE... Progressives. Calling them anything else, is no different than all the improper terminology use with firearms.

Yeah, but... don't you know people are stupid? That is of course, what all the Progressives think... We are all just too stupid, too stupid to make much of any decision for ourselves. So, ya know... that 90% could be massively stupid. Maybe they don't really want background checks. They are so stupid that they don't even know what "Universal Background Checks" means... because they are stupid and don't know that that doesn't mean/include a federal panel of experts, which is what they really want. So, can't trust the public's opinion, cause they are stupid... And then of course, it's that ridiculous 10% of even stupider people that are holding everything up. What a stupid country we live in. Ya know, we wouldn't even have to think if we had a supreme ruler. I think we need a King. Shotgun! I'm King! Oh wait... that's violent terminology. Shame on me.

No, you just need to read more... stop watching tv. "being able to carry a gun around." Sigh... pathetic.

Exactly... it CAN be changed, through Amendment, and set up this way to prevent actions based on emotion, instead of logic and reason.

You have problems with reading comprehension. Principles do not change. Human Nature has not changed. Technology had nothing to do with it... and if technology became an issue, the Constitution can easily be changed. That's pretty stupid and condescending. Our own citizens, because of the Progressive Era, barely know history... so your insinuations about the Men of the Convention, when you don't even understand how they viewed the scale of Power, is ridiculous. This is similar to the circular arguments I have had with Quade...

It wouldn't be a compromise on beliefs... It would be ignoring history; the study of history, government, and human nature which brought him TO that recognition.

I already have, multiple times... Death To Tyrants... my home state of Virginia's Motto. Since you are Canadian (unless just living there), like with Europeans, I don't blame you if you don't understand power as Franklin (and the others) did. Human Nature has not changed... ideas have and can change, but Human Nature has not. And thank G-d to date, we haven't had a way to change it. The Progressive Era was ugly, and they were wrong. However, Transhumanism could most definitely bring about a change if computers are merged with the brain and not simply the body. But that is not inevitable... And soon the evolution of arms... will be unregulatable by any government. So, the discussions we are having now are pointless. That is if you are looking to the future... Progressives (in both parties) don't seem to think that anyone but they, are looking to the future. ("They want to take us back to slavery, and no women suffrage... and blah blah blah.")

Feel free to explain... I fully disagree.

Has human nature changed in the last 220 years?

Exactly Right... its about power. That's why I say... No More Power. Very Stupid Comment