nolhtairt

Reality Winner. That's her name, honest to God. An unabashed bleeding heart liberal and Trump-hater with an extensive social media history to match... We'll have to wait and see what happens, but here's my take on it: A few years in a federal prison will ensure that she can begin her female to male transition on the taxpayers dime. After s(he) gets out, s(he) can marry Chelsea Manning and star in some twisted reality series comparing their issues. At least they shouldn't be able to reproduce. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/06/who-is-reality-winner-accused-leaker-wanted-to-resist-trump.html

LMFAO. Have you been to Beijing? On a good day, you still need a surgical mask just to breathe without polluting your lungs too badly.

I would think so. They might need to review their protocols. This is likely going to happen again. Every minute counts.

She is clearly flaunting the system. Wow. http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/ny-judge-arrested-led-from-courthouse-in-handcuffs/ar-BBC6AKq?li=BBnb7Kz

For what it's worth, I don't see him being re-elected

Trump is providing a golden opportunity for comedians all over to make fun of him. Although Griffin's joke was in extremely bad taste, Trump's continued use of Twitter to bully people around is part of the problem.

Bingo. This is going to bite her in the ass more than she ever thought.

Companies have every right to terminated contracts with talent if the talent becomes an issue for the image of the company. I'm not saying I agree with it in every case, but I can understand it in this one. That's less of a free speech issue and more of a company embarrassment issue. It is almost certainly something in their contract. When a show has advertisers pull out because of a controversy involving guests or hosts on the show, that's going to be a problem for the company producing the show, and they'll react and take action as needed.

Oregon has it, but they don't actually use it (continued moratorium). Would committing multiple murders in the context of "hate crimes" qualify as a federal crime? If yes, he can get executed in record time, ala Timothy McVeigh and within the next 5-7 years, Dylann Roof.

That's because Prime Minister Markovic is a) just happy to be there (yet to be inducted into NATO), and b) much more gracious of a diplomat. The Lithuanian president, on the other hand, is looking at POTUS like, "are you f*ing kidding me?" You think so?

This is why the rest of the world thinks we're dicks. He's not God. What language do aviation use in air traffic control communications world wide? English of course. Sounds like your president should be walking behind and bowing to the Queen then. Oh please, that old hag? We became the world police after WWII.

How about the wacko democrat lady that ran a Republican congressman in Tennessee off the road because she didn't like his politics?

This is why the rest of the world thinks we're dicks. He's not God. What language do aviation use in air traffic control communications world wide? English of course.

And then there was the recent case where an asshole neighbor was using his drone to terrorize the family dog, which then got sick of the bullshit and jumped up to nab the drone and destroy it. Asshole drone owner sued for loss of drone, dog owner counter-sued for vet hospital bills for injuries the dog suffered. Dog owner won.

So it happens again. At least 22 dead and over 100 injured by a suicide bomber at the end of the concert. Kids and teenagers among the dead. Asshole.

Richard Nixon was on his way to being impeached when he decided to resign over the Watergate cover up scandal.

I cannot give you the line & verse but I seem to remember that courts have ruled that you ( all of us ) do not have a right to privacy when out in the open, even when we are on our own property. And I might be completely wrong on this. Jerry Baumchen Lets put it this way... I don't know what the privacy laws are, they vary from state to state, but if you have a swimming pool in your backyard that's surrounded by a privacy fence, you would expect to have that privacy, until some camera equipped drone appears over the fence to spy on you, your family, etc. I'd have a problem with that.

Sounds like a certain farmer who used to border our DZ. Well that's different. Skydivers gotta land somewhere and do it safely. As long as they do their best not to disturb crops, cause damage, etc...

Good. Not even the FAA can override an Act of Congress. We can now fly paper planes outdoors again without having to register with the government. Now if they would just drop the part where it's illegal to shoot down a drone that's right over your property with cameras on it being operated by an asshole. Public Law 112-95 Sections 331-336 define unmanned aerial vehicles (aka "drones") as aircraft. They are therefore protected by federal law in the same way that any other aircraft is protected. Which makes it a federal crime to shoot at them. How about nets, ropes or similar? Seriously, what if some dingaling is videoing from a drone that's over my property, within easy reach (say 15 or 20 feet)? While I agree that shooting them down is wrong, so is invading my privacy. Makes me so glad there are no houses in view from mine and the nearest one is over 100 yards away, across the street from me which is hidden by a curving driveway and over grown vegetation on both sides. I never have to worry about some dingbat asshole neighbor doing that shit, nor do I have to waste my ammo on their drones and get in trouble for it. Keep your fucking drones over your property or take them out to a wide open space where privacy isn't an issue. Don't be an asshole, and nobody will be an asshole back to you.

Good. Not even the FAA can override an Act of Congress. We can now fly paper planes outdoors again without having to register with the government. Now if they would just drop the part where it's illegal to shoot down a drone that's right over your property with cameras on it being operated by an asshole.

While I agree that Trump should refrain from praising brutal dictators or saying he would be honored to meet such and such, as for Erdogan trying to solidify his powers, I can't blame him after that failed coup to oust him. He's trying to make sure it doesn't happen again. Not that I agree with his methods anyway.

Correct. When you are dealing with a liar, you are likely to get the opposite of what you were promised. Christians will get less religious freedom. Pro-lifers will get more abortions. Gun folks will get gun restrictions. Blue collar workers will get fewer old economy jobs. As far as touting the large number of executive orders as a sign of success, all that shows is that he will not be able to accomplish anything through normal democratic channels. Gun folks will get gun restrictions? I do not think so.

Rut roh! Another democrat behaving badly! Okay okay, wife of a democrat... https://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/nation/2017/05/08/report-fbi-investigating-jane-sanders-alleged-bank-fraud/101424438/

Congrats, you post about a democrat Even though CBS leaves that out.... I see you still have that reading comprehension problem. It does say she's a Democrat. Further down the story.