Coreeece

Again, they would have to prove that the dealer sold the gun to that particular snitch and then prove that it was an illegal sale. Typically when it comes to the narcs, they give up the name of their dealer. The feds then raid the house, confiscate the illegal drugs and charge the dealer with possession/distribution. In this case with the guns, the feds would raid the house, confiscate the firearms and charge the "dealer" with the possession of guns that he legally owns, thus resulting in a false arrest lawsuit. Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

Merica, where guns are a right and health care a privilege. Free guns and free healthcare...we're gonna need it. Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

It could be...It does seem that we have a much more violent cultural upbringing - and the gang life in this country is out of control. Also, Normiss posted a link awhile back about how almost every mass murderer in the last 20 years or so was on psychotropic drugs. The article is no longer available and I don't have the time to dig around for it right now. I also read something that psychotropic drug use is more prevalent in the U.S than any other country, especially among younger people...so it might be something to look into. Overall, the U.S needs to find common ground and fix itself from the inside out, because right now we're just trying whitewash all of our issues with law... Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

My bad bro...apologies. Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

You can keep comparing this to racial hatred if you want...Hell, why not just compare it to Hitler and the Nazis while you're at it. ..but a more accurate analogy would be comparing it to a Christians that refuse to do satanic weddings. That won't be necessary. I suppose when a gay couple comes in for the consultation, I could say, "hey look, I just want you to know that I've never shot/edited a gay wedding before. I'm a bit out of touch with the homosexual lifestyle and I'm afraid that my inexperience in this area might limit the creative value I could offer. Our firm would be willing to accommodate you as best as we could, but I know Adam and Steve Productions down the street are very experienced in this genre - They're great, I think you'd love 'em. If they still insisted, I suppose I could subcontract it out just as I do other work, such as voice-overs, custom music, 3D rigging. Any profit could then be donated... Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

Ron, who recently explained that he is afraid of black people has a racist ex-cop friend who said so. What more proof do you need? How about proof of wtf you're talking about? Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

Just so you know, selective quoting tactics tend to be more effective when you allow more time/content to fill the space between your selective quote and the post you're trying to manipulate.... Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

In case you haven't noticed, you're not the only person I responded to in this thread...there is more content. Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

You obviously read fuck all what I posted in the link...it's all addressed in that thread. It's because you're lazy...you don't read nor comprehend. You don't even have the common decency to quote who you're responding to - which is why nobody knows wtf you're talking about half the time without following a long paper trail of your lame one-liners and persistent grammatical errors that you blame on your dog... Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

You must've missed the part about me not denying service to gay clients that need my home improvement services...those jobs typically don't force me to attend and promote gay weddings. But ya...be my guest, let someone else do it. Live and let live...right? It's none of my business. Why should the state be allowed to hold me ransom for some homosexual's immorality? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rFoGVkZ29w Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=4759871;search_string=my%20business;#4759871 Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

C'mon, he said the month of September some real tribulation is going to start. There are still a couple of hours left, have faith -- his prayers for destruction and mayhem might still come true. Apparently Russia beckoned the call, unfortunately... In case you haven't noticed, there are people in other countries living a life of biblical proportions...if only they knew. Welcome to the next 7 years... Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

That's the problem...they also said that it's none of my business if a man wants to marry another man, but now they want to make it my business....live and let live, eh? HA... Fucking liberals - give 'em an inch, they take a mile...never again. Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

I've been perfectly clear...you just refuse to listen. Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

She's not being forced to do anything. She can quit any time she wants. Something a rapist might say while holding a gun to her head? YES. Her job is to process legal paperwork on behalf of the county. That is what this is. She doesn't get to decide which legal processes she facilitates and which she doesn't. And if she thought no laws would ever change while she was in office then she's a fucking moron as well as a hateful bigot. Nope, changing laws do not make one a bogot, sorry. Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

bullish, you don't give a shit about kim's divorce papers, nor about those who may or may not have signed them. -Do I like her attitude? - NO. -Should she be forced to have her name on homosexual marriage licenses thus promoting even more gross sexual immorality - NO. -Was this part of her job description when getting hired/elected? - NO Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

I can't speak on her morality, but would you call me a bigot and throw me in jail if I refused to sign her divorce papers? Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

I like you gowlerk, but I'd like you even more if you could use that heavily edited paragraph using the following: Abortion Baby kicking legs brain 500k salary begging for money on twitter for being under attack Claire Underwood Planned Parenthood Medicaid...really? You get reimbursed by medicaid for services performed...oh, ok...guess you're not really that important after all, eh? Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

^This. Having a "business" that is open to the public means that you have to serve the public. The whole of the public. Offering the services only to a select group, say one's own church congregation or only to members of that particular faith would be one thing. But once somebody starts offering it to everyone except select groups (especially if one of those groups is a "protected class") is discrimination. Again, homosexual weddings aren't heterosexual weddings - they are two completely different services. Would you have a public brothel force homosexual prostitutes to have heterosexual sex in cities where prostitution is legal? Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

One could certainly make a biblical case for that, but the issue of mixed race back then wasn't about morality, nor was it about sexual immorality. It was about remaining faithful to God. By intermixing - THE JEWS - were lead astray to other gods... (now, please don't take my word on that - I haven't studied this topic in depth, but I'm pretty confident) Thank you, and the U.S should understand as well. This is a legitimate issue regardless of how trivial secular society may feel. Personally I would like a provision to be made that differentiates homosexual marriage from heterosexual marriage - they are clearly two different services. Granted any provision like this is likely to be abused, but as we've learned, that's life in a free society... Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

Which is completely different. But the reasons for not providing it, are not Yes they are. With the exception of the part about not wanting the company being associated with pornography - no, they're not. Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

There's nothing gay about hitting the record button and aiming the camera. No one is asking you to provide gay services. They are asking you to provide wedding photography services. They would be forcing me to participate in an event that I'm honestly not morally comfortable with...but I uderstand people can be dicks like that and don't care. Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

Boy, don't ya know it is a war on women going on out there? Hell, them burqas might do us some justice with all those fugly transexuals walking around now-a-days... On a serious note - intolerance can be a good thing, especially when somebody's life is at risk because of one's belief. In your "analogy" my concern would primarily be for the black man. What an injustice, right? What can we do for this guy? He could die... But it seems the concern with what we were actually talking about isn't for the poor homosexuals and their lack of a photographer as much as it's about the perceived evil conservative christians that we all hate...who cares what they believe, who cares if they're having a crisis of conscience, who cares if they have a genuine religious concern about attending a gay wedding - They're probably all like that kim davis hypocrite bitch with 20 divorces - to hell with them...to hell with them all - they're gonna take those god damned fucking pictures or get their dumb asses tossed in jail - let allah sort 'em out... Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

Which is completely different. But the reasons for not providing it, are not Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

So, it's okay to be bigoted if you wrap it up in religion? Your freedom to practice your religion ends when it interferes with my rights. It's that simple. I agree, I simply do not provide gay services, nor do I provide prongraphy services, nor do I promote other types of religion or christian views contrary to my beliefs...deal with it. Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour