Coreeece

It's been my experience that once this plugin has analyzed the video and applied the stabilization, it's doubtful that any "tweaking" is going to dramatically improve the footage any further - you might be able to correct some subtle imperfections, but that's about it. Stabilization plugins are typically designed for a relatively low to moderate level of undesired movement. Is it possible that the shakiness of the footage is just too jarring in some areas and beyond the threshold of that which is salvageable - there are limits. Another issue could be with the tracking points. If there are no highly contrasted static images that stay in frame long enough, then there may not be enough reference information that the program can use to determine the amount of compensation necessary. I found a script from a guy named Tyler Hurd that will automate the process in After Effects. It had a little bug that caused an error in newer versions of AE, so I modified it just a bit and attached it below. Basically, after you've imported your files into AE, select all your footage and goto: File >Scripts>Run Script File - and then select the attached script. Once you run it, it will place all of your footage into individual comps with the warp stabilizer applied and send it to the render que automatically. Don't hit render until all the footage has finished being analyzed - which you already know takes awhile. IMPORTANT 1 - The output module template is set to "lossless" so if you want a different setting, you'll have to create your own output template in AE and then update the script with the new name of your custom template in the following section of the script: 2 - This script will allow AE to basically analyze all of your footage at once, so it's takes up a lot of RAM and is very heavy on the processors. If you put too many videos in there at once, it could suck up all of your RAM - AE will crash and you'll have to start all over. Since I don't know the specs of your system, I would recommend starting at 5 or 10 videos and see how it handles. I know more powerful computers can do around 50 videos at once and still maintain stability. 3 - Right now the script has the warp stabilizer settings set at the following: Smoothness - 100% Method - subspace warp Detailed analysis - On If you eventually find settings that work better with your footage and want to change the ones above - or even add more - you'll have to update the "stabilize settings" section of the script that looks like the following: If you have any questions, I could walk you through it. If you don't feeling like bothering with script, then this plugin may work better you: http://www.prodad.com/home/products/video_optimization/300391667,l-us.html Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

Is that what they're calling it these days? Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

Actually, I think Obama said it a bit differently: "The United States of America, right now, has the strongest, most stable economy in the world... The United States of America is the most powerful nation on Earth. Period. It's not even close...it's not even close...it's not even close... Our troops are the finest fighting force in the history of the world...alright. When it comes to every important international issue, people of the world do not look to Beijing or Moscow to lead - they call us." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NsWy57lrJxk Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

Back in the 80's they would've just started shooting at the truck and jump out of the way at the last minute as the bad guy blasts right through the center of the roadblock, unscathed... https://vimeo.com/70280204 Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

I would've suggested chador. Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

Can I vote this reply as the best sarcasm of the year. Love it. America actually has at least one great option. Hilary Clinton is very well qualified, extremely capable, and is going to be a fine president. All is not lost. Even better, I vote this one for best sarcasm of the year! I think he's actually serious. I am serious. Sorry, apparently I spoke too soon when I referred to you in the other thread as a reasonable and thoughtful individual. Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

Really? Please, don't tell me that your recently admitted intolerance has filled you so full of partisan bullshit that you can't tell the difference between respect and censorship? Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

We gather that. He's as tolerant as a liberal could ever be: http://40.media.tumblr.com/f47ed460f6c499ee226013457d0f318a/tumblr_mtsedg7Sug1rudjcro1_500.jpg Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

Ya, well, there should be. Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

Can I vote this reply as the best sarcasm of the year. Love it. America actually has at least one great option. Hilary Clinton is very well qualified, extremely capable, and is going to be a fine president. All is not lost. Even better, I vote this one for best sarcasm of the year! Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

Meh, they're more like our bitch. Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

Sarcasm rarely comes off properly in writing Ya, especially when your next sentence says "Really and seriously, I look forward to your response on this matter." I can appreciate sarcasm, but when formally addressing an issue that you obviously take very seriously, one would think you'd assign a certain level of professionalism that you feel it deserves - which apparently isn't much. Tho I can admit that the letter does have some elements of substance - like the part comparing abortion to hip replacement surgery - any legitimacy is lost in the overshadowing condescension. The letter is a sarcastic joke and it will be treated as such. Now I know dealing with an obtuse government can be an exercise in futility - and it's even more frustrating when a sincere response is ignored - so as selfish as it may be, perhaps your course of action is most effective. Do you feel better? Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

I can respect your passion, but seriously, I was expecting a rational, well thought out argument coming from such a formal letter. From your letter: "How exactly are you going to prosecute all the fertilizations that do not result in pregnancy? Because this bill would define that as a felony." I mean really? really? That's what you wanted to bring to the official platform? This letter serves nothing other than your personal catharsis with absurd commentary not worth taking seriously. It's like you said earlier, just a bunch of whining - the flipside of the same coin. Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

That's like the 3rd or 4th time you've put words in my mouth. I've already imagined putting myself in that situation and I'd expect the experience to be quite surreal to say the least. If you've been paying attention, you'd see that I've been asking about the scope of the problem - how widespread is this? Th PP clinics I've seen don't have any protesters - I'd expect it the same for most others. If this is a major problem, then PP needs to address it more efficiently - Asking for TK's volunteer escort services doesn't seem to be a solution, nor does it make it seem like the life threatening situation that Trigirl was trying to make it out to be. Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

Ya, well try telling that to the protesters, maybe they'll just go away - Problem solved. (If it's really that big of a problem to begin with?) Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

Deciding to stop providing abortion services (whether referrals, non-judgmental counseling, or direct abortion provision) will impact a core service in this market in some states. So its disingenuous to say they should consider the convenience of their patients. In response to the public backlash, planned parenthood has stop taking reimbursement for the cost of fetal tissue. Since then, many of the protests have subsided - I suspect the problem isn't as bad as TK and TriGirl make it out to be. There may still be some intense protesting in select locations - and if those facilities don't want to address that issue, then I'm sure many of their would be clients will easily find somewhere else to go. Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

Whatever helps you sleep at night - I'm sure the protesters think they're helping to save innocent lives. Why does the argument always come back to this? Because that's how protesters typically justify their behavior, especially bad behavior. Why would that matter to the protesters? Personally, I've always despised the mob-like mentality of protesting regardless of the cause, but it's the peoples' right nonetheless - every business and organization are subject to it, and I see no reason why planned parenthood should be exempt. If the public perceives an offense, it should come as no surprise that they are going to protest that organization, business or government just as they always have. As I said earlier, public opinion plays a major role in how perceptions are formed and decisions are made. Corporations tend to act promptly to resolve any negative response to their product and/or service. As a non-profit, I would think that PP's main concern would be for clients - and if certain practices are causing a disservice to the majority of those they help, then perhaps it's time to start rethinking their business model - just like any other corporate entity. Anyway, great post - too bad you don't come around more often. Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

A little too late for "responsibility." Seems more like damage control to me. It's through opinions that perceptions are formed and decisions are made. Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

The majority of people in these pictures are women - I think I even seen a few black men. https://www.google.com/search?q=abortion+protest&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjUgqrT2sfKAhWILSYKHRjkBxsQ_AUIBygB&biw=1097&bih=478#tbm=isch&q=pro+life+protest Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

Whatever helps you sleep at night - I'm sure the protesters think they're helping to save innocent lives. THINK???? Hell, they KNOW they are! ...and TK knows he's helping women get healthcare - it's all about perspective, right? Neither side is doing anything illegal. I just prefer different methods to achieve both objectives. Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

Whatever helps you sleep at night - I'm sure the protesters think they're helping to save innocent lives. Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

Sounds like you're the flip-side of the same coin. Both sides rightfully deserve to live in anger with their hatred - have fun. Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

Good for you - try not to get any blood on your hands. Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour

If any laws were broken, I'd expect them to be held liable, both criminally and civilly. For me, the legality of their actions just makes it that much more repulsive. Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour