FLYJACK

What about airstairs lowered in flight being Cooper's initial demand.. I think almost everyone still has that wrong and it IS a big deal. Ignoring contrary evidence isn't really a good way to check your own work.. A big part of it is that I am not interested in giving you my research... I actually prefer you remain wrong... I post to create a record for others. You are a Vortex influencer and are misleading the people in two ways,, pushing some bad ideas and selectively ignoring other's bad ideas.

What are you even talking about...

Now, you are making up stuff.. and are spewing false information.. no, I am not going to correct it for you. Clearly, you have a bias against Hahneman or is it me,, that is fine. I am not selling him.. Interesting, you never attack Limbach who IS trying to sell Skip, obviously not Cooper. Amazing, you lie and accuse me of making up stuff then you make up stuff... such an amateur. I am in agreement with the FBI on sketch B,, Anybody who disagrees with you, it is because of a bias... No, it is because of the evidence.

You just said that I am making up "stuff" that is not only a lie, it is an act of desperation

Too late.. Not making up anything... You need to lie and discredit me to distract from your weak argument. Really,, Hayden never met Cossey, he bought his chutes from a surplus store. Cossey's NB6 claim is unsubstantiated. That is a fact. You keep claiming I have some bias for sketch B. NO, I am looking at the evidence. Now you claim Hahneman doesn't look like B inferring no reason for a bias.. So, which is it? Am I wrong because of a bias or not.. or just throw anything at me that might stick. Does the FBI have a bias claiming sketch B is the best likeness.. You want it both ways.. Regardless... You are still wrong and often really bad at assessing evidence and forming arguments. You can't explain why the witnesses liked suspects that resembled B not A.. Just ignore anything that doesn't fit your speculation. Or, you seem to think having witnesses interviewed together is more valid than separately,, ridiculous. Look at the bright side,, you can still spew this nonsense on FB and in vids. Nobody will challenge you there...

1985 Issaquah jump training video.. Instructor/pilot is wearing a back chute only at about 11:00

Yes, I think Cossey did own an NB6 for flying students with a modified handle and no D rings.. that is why he initially assumed THAT HIS rig was sent to Cooper via Issaquah, but it wasn't. He never corrected his error and covered it up by NOT providing his packing records. That wasn't the back chute sold to Hayden and not the rig Cooper used. Hayden bought the rigs from a surplus store. They had Cossey pack them for Hayden.. It is possible Cossey sold his rig through the surplus store but very unlikely.

Sketch A or B... Clearly B.. Murphy,, sketch A vs B... Clearly B. Really close..

It is true.. I have found about 20 unique ones. If I showed you that height research would it change your mind? probably not. My point is that witness recall for height is poor especially in a plane... and I have data that proves it. Height estimates are just not that accurate. The FBI themselves used 5'8" as a lower bound (it isn't just me), the initial description used 5'9"... 6' is the upper bound and not likely based on weight and build. Did you check other hijacker's. Research shows people use impressions/stereotype variables like race, age, ethnicity, body size, etc.. when recalling and estimating height... it is hard enough to guess somebody's height when they are standing in front of you, try recalling height from memory.. Nobody measured Cooper's height and we have a relatively small sample size for height estimates in NORJAK.. He was close to 5'10" in shoes.

Shutter and I had already eliminated the Hick's placard before the Edward's book... Norjak did NOT have the optional emergency airstair release... never had that specific decal.

Ray Ban Balorama is very close... Ray Ban Chalet is a good runner up..

Died in the jump.. based on evidence very unlikely. If he pulled he lived. Carr thinks that since everyone talks Cooper must have died not to talk,, Cooper did talk, the FBI just never discovered it. Jump location. New data analysis, not used by Soderlind supports an 8:11 jump… I would say with 95% to be conservative (100%) certainty. A Battleground or Orchards jump is off the table. Larry did say on DZ Cossey got the back chutes from his house. Maybe before he learned about Hayden. “NB6” is NOT a fact it is an unsubstantiated claim by Cossey, a serial liar and even though he was required to keep his packing records he never supplied them to confirm his claim.. Cossey’s description of the missing chute does not match the packing card or Hayden’s description.. Objective analysis of the evidence indicates it is very unlikely that the missing container was an NB6. It is NOT a FACT. Cossey falsely claimed he was paid for it and the chute left behind was returned.. Cossey's NB6 claim is not verified and NOT a fact. Height. Both wrong on height.. The FBI noted in the files to NOT reject a suspect based on height, they used 5’8” as a lower bound. I assume because of reported variances and shoes... Cooper was seated most of the time, when Flo wrote 6’1” she had NOT seen Cooper standing after he was known to be the hijacker. In the Hahneman case, I have documented 20 witness accounts describing his height between 5’10” and 6’, witness height recall is just not very accurate, studies have proved this. The first Cooper description was 5’9”-6’,, Height is a recall estimate based on many variables,,, Cooper’s initial weight was 150-175 and med to stocky, at 6’ tall that is thin. Cooper was later described as average to well built.. 170-180 lbs average to well built matches 5”10” not 6’... Sketch A vs B.. Still wrong Ryan, your argument is speculative not objective.. that date error is not causative, it is incidental. The process for sketch B was more comprehensive and being done anyway. Both Murphy and LD Cooper were liked by witnesses and they look like B not A. Three witnesses together is big NO-NO… The FBI said in the files that Sketch B is the best likeness… though not needed for the argument an undisclosed image I have supports B. There is no evidence to support A over B, none. The witnesses liked suspects that matched B NOT A.. Bill Mitchell saw strange socks,, maybe a jump suit.

Not hard to tell, no match. The other side is a different decal altogether.

Maybe, but we already knew about the dogs... Did they eat the containers as well? Could be both..

Cooper took food...

A few corrections... Horn rimmed glasses are not defined by the corner shape but by the frame material. Originally there were wire frame and horn/tortoise frame glasses.. plastic/acetate replaced horn/tortoise but the name remained. Horn rimmed refers to thick plastic frames that replaced/mimicked horn/tortoise frames.. So, Cooper's glasses can be wraparound AND horn rimmed.. Cooper's glasses in the sketch closely match Ray Ban Balorama's or Chalet.. There were a few similar styles that could have prescription lenses.. Balorama's.. Ray Ban Chalet. The sunglasses Cunningham found were NOT Cooper's.. they have no bottom rim. Like the FP time shift and Skip the Vortex is getting polluted with nonsense. Aslo.. The Hick's placard was debunked years ago. No, Norjak did not have the decal that matches the Hick's placard. There was an optional emergency release for 727's which had a handle in the stairwell and below from outside access, NORJAK did not have this option. There were a few different decals used on the outside of 727's. Hick's placard. Note the number of lines and length/position of lines. NORJAK, it is missing most of the decal.. text lines do not match Hick's placard.. Pursuit of DB Cooper plane, decal also missing part of the decal.. also does not match Hick's placard. Same location as Norjak. Not all 727's had the same placard's there were several different placards used at that location. Norjak did not have that specific Hick's placard.

Blevins posted this.. Cooper sleuth Meyer Louie passes away...

Not sure if they rejected suspects only based on prints. I never used DNA or print results as the sole reason for elimination. It was probably more of a fishing expedition,,,

Very astute.. If the DNA is a dead end and the prints have no value,,, How do we put a suspect on the plane and solve this 100%?? This is the dilemma I have been working on..

That is a washed out photo and he looks younger there, no turkey neck.. I posted images that accurately show his forehead details.. Get real Ryan. No way those EXTREME forehead lines were NOT noticed by witnesses.. not one. Just those extreme forehead lines alone eliminates him. His nose is irrelevant. This is closer to the hijacking...

I don't have to find anything,, The FBI stated Sketch B is the most accurate. Your argument is speculative. The actual construction of your argument is flawed. It is nonsense and ignores the context. Your premise's are bad. The error is the ONLY reason for B,, nonsense You claim that 3 witnesses sitting together is somehow more reliable. False. This is never done, they can influence each other. Witnesses should be interviewed separately. and Murphy was liked by witnesses, he matches B very well below the sunglasses, sketch A does not. You have an opinion with nothing to back it up. B is more accurate, the evidence indicates it, the FBI said it and the process was more comprehensive. Murphy sketch A vs B... B is much better.

Cooper jumped at 8:11, I have new data and it is irrefutable. He did not jump later. I always felt it may have been as far south as Battleground but no longer. I won't post the data because it wouldn't matter to most and I am using it for my project. This is NOT Cooper's forehead Ryan.. These are not average forehead lines, these are extreme deep lines that go right down the temple. No Cooper witness mentioned forehead lines like this. Skip was not Cooper. Any objective person can understand this. This is the equivalent of Reca's nose.... and he doesn't have wavy, curly, marcelled hair... Skip may be an interesting guy but he clearly was NOT Cooper. Sketch A vs B... more nonsense.. Sketch B is the best likeness... It is essentially a widened version of A with the nose also proportionally widened. It is also aged and coloured. I have lots of evidence to support this maybe one day I'll post it but I don't think people really understand it with the misinformation out there.. sketch B was not created ONLY because of an error, that was incidental not causative. Ryan's argument that the error caused B and therefore B is not accurate is unfounded speculation. It is a logical non-sequitur. The FBI said B is the most accurate and I have undisclosed evidence that proves B is more accurate.. though still a composite sketch. The idea that a Cooper suspect must match A and not B is actually insane.

I have zero interest in Tosaw's opinions and actions... His contribution to the case is his book because he interviewed so many relevant people,, It is very accurate in that context, of course Cossey lied to him and there are some minor errors here and there... even Alice liked the book.. but overall it is a very important Cooper book.

Updated analysis Cooper left the plane between 20:11 and 20:12. While not conclusive it is very strong new evidence. If Cooper jumped then he could have drifted up to 6 miles if he pulled right away, or if he pulled late 1 mile drift and he might be virtually under the path as it has a 1 mile error. Depending on the wind direction at that location he could have landed just N of the Lewis R. I would estimate a 20:11 - 20:12 jump at 95%...

Tosaw named the people he spoke with, odd he didn't mention Bill.. but, point is if Mitchell boarded before Cooper that is why Cooper chose the left side...