rehmwa

well, that's 20th century, we're two centuries out of date, not one - but it seems silly to spend the money to revamp our entire minting and printing technology for something that's perfectly functional as is why not just ditch it completely in lieu of personal credit/transfer cards? or even no cards and just account transfers and balances with a thumb print? (just think, uncle sam could track and tax and monitor - maybe even approve or deny - every single purchase each person makes) ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

IMO - that one should be deleted, it's asinine. It's reflective of the attitude of wives as property, not a nation of individuals Although it does work in both directions, does it not? A man cannot be compelled to testify against his wife? absolutely. however, that's not pertinent to my point (I should have written it "was" reflective of) - If an individual is in court for suspicion of breaking the law, why should there be a special class of citizen that is exempt from testifying in the case? it's silly Of course, I also think that the nature of anyone's relationship is none of the business of the government. Marriage of any kind should be a private contract and government shouldn't be discouraging or encouraging (via benefits or whatever) in any way. People should be responsible for themselves and their relationships. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

Why do they have to have a set amount of time? If the student can show the basics and knowledge correctly, I don't much care if it takes 5 minutes or 20 hours. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

it's only fair, 8 years ago there were a lot of ASSuptions as well made about what the other guy was thinking in his private thoughts It makes it easier to have contentious threads. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

IMO - that one should be deleted, it's asinine. It's reflective of the attitude of wives as property, not a nation of individuals ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

absolutely (but it shouldn't be a huge cost or expense to demonstrate it if you already have that knowledge - a simple quiz or personal demo with the sheriff would do. Or a certificate from a gun safety course just about anywhere. Or transcripts from a complete course in high school even. The thing to avoid is the legislation of unnecessarily complex training required from only gun sanctioned and expensive course providers....that would get out of control fast) ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

calm is smooth smooth is fast slow is slow ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

hush - you'll give our governor another wacky idea for cash grabbititude ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

I don't have anything to add or subtract from that - it's perfect ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

I don't get it - what's wrong with one fishing/golfing/skydiving/camping week away from home each month? seems to simplify scheduling a lot ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

that is funny for the exact same reason ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

I suspect your post would align better with a philosophy that: every one is an individual, and to try and box them all into one set of assumptions is silly. very likely people could be gay for many reasons - some healthy, some not, some pretty vaguely defined. People are varied and amazing. I wouldn't accept a one size fits all rationalization or reason. For pretty much anything. But I suspect that a very significantly "most" are just naturally inclined to be that way rather than the smaller group that would have various other reasons. And that's the perspective one has to take to it. If a very small subset actually did choose the lifestyle due to abuse, confusion, rebellion, to break into an acting career (ok, that last one is reaching).... It seems unfair to treat the entire group based on rare outliers.... On the other hand, the other side really does have to acknowledge those outliers as not really part of the community, but perhaps those people that need even more help and understanding. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

since all other campaign promises are crap anyway, it's probably as good a criteria for selecting a president from either party as any other criteria I'm sold. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

Thanks for calling my position 'perfect' . I do agree with you, my grump is that well meaning people end up being assholes in a debate that requires clear communication and not the vitriol - pick the individuals on any side of a debate that can't do that - it's the same ones every time. This whole - take tiny steps in the direction of goodness is a great intent, but it's the cause of a really messed up code. Our law structure/tax codes/etc, in every area, is so completely screwed up, and so nuanced, and so designed to cater to this group or that group, and unnecessarily complex, that I've become a strong advocate of just scrapping the whole mess and starting from scratch. (except it would be the same morons doing that work that messed it up in the first place). Simple, minimal, direct, without any social engineering involved other than every individual gets the same protections - it's missing, it's needed. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

the stock response to that is "you hate gays so much, that you'd rather delete it for everyone rather than allow it for them" So a discussion that actually, and rationally, focuses on individual rights, is viciously shut down because it doesn't push the short term goal. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

that's a great question - other than it's not 'rights', it's 'benefits' - speech, worship, bearing arms, bearing witness (bearing witness is point of discussion) applies to all individuals all individuals are supposed to have the same rights "couples" shouldn't have special gov benefits... INDIVIDUALS should. why do hetereosexual 'couples' get to have special benefits that singles don't? giving special benefits for anybody just because of how they associate (other than becoming a citizen) - is unfair it's very insightful how people talk about entitlements and benefits.....yet use the words "rights" ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

thanks - check out the video links on the site too (I'd recommend), he did a three way last summer and also as tandem master (only with the passenger also a tandem master). It's very cool. ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

This is exactly that conversation. Government benefits that tie to the definition. Outside of government, people can and do pair up any way they want. I don't see why two individuals getting married (hetero or otherwise) is any business of the government at all - to encourage or discourage. it's non of the gov's business ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

god that was funny ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

You seem to have a lot of knowledge about that matter. How many donkey f****rs do you know? this is a skydiver's site - this topic might overwhelm the thread. you should probably start a new one in Bonfire. they know the most about it ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

sure, go ahead and hit the 'contact or volunteer' tab and there's contact information for you to ask about it if you don't like paypal THANKS a ton ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

is that some kind of quiche? or a frozen dessert of some kind I can never remember ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

soaking in brine really leaches out the mercury - MUCH more healthier ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

it's worked for me ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants

This is speakers corner So, Go find a nice PUBLIC school, and donate all your equipment to them. I'm sure it'll only COST you a few thousand dollars to get it processed: - safety review and school compatability assessment - confirmation that the gear is culturally non-biased - environmentally responsible disposing of any gear that could possibly be used to bully specific demographics - bullying of majority demographics is acceptable though - toxic content assessment - pay off of new equipment vendors with under the table deals to supply the school you might need to ensure that property tax increases are assured to hire a 'donated equipment director of sensitivity and usage' position By the way, since this stuff is all sports related and not sensitive to artistic or IQ motivated children, you might have to attend a local sensitivity clinic to reset your priority balance. As well as 'sponsor' a grief counselor to visit the school and be available for the children that feel left out. good luck and thanks for thinking about the children (those children the NEA deems deserving of being thought about) edit: By the way, is the lacrosse equipment handicap accessible usable? just checking ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants