Skyrad

Members
  • Content

    10,801
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by Skyrad

  1. How can it not? If the universe is not only rapidly expanding and even accelerating then clearly it once started from a point somewhere. If not can you tell me what your understanding is? When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca
  2. Why are you banging on about Christianity for? You seem unable to understand the concept of a creator and religion. When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca
  3. If the universe is every rapidly expanding then it makes sense that its started from an originating point so what existed before the big bang? I have no idea on the origins of a creator any more than you have an explanation for the big bang. It seems a bit of a double standard that I'm expected to know the origins of a creator when no one knows the origin of the big bang. So for all the science the origin of the big bang theory remains as elusive as scientific proof of God. Our science is in its infancy, To say that the creator is 'nowhere to be found' is quite funny seeing as mankind is limited to one planet and has traveled no further than the moon. We have not even begun to explore our solar system let alone the universe. Oh, we have radio telescopes but who says God is a DJ? When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca
  4. It makes a change from it being the CIA or Mossad (presuming that its true and actually isn't an op by the aforementioned). When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca
  5. LMFAO No way! Are you serious??? When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca
  6. Hi Mate, Not sure I understood your post but are you saying that if I want you'll pay for a airfare to Uganda? All I have to do to collect is say I agree? It's a one way ticket ... but you're no kid sir Bitch Well thats a shame, I always fancied going to see the gorillas. When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca
  7. 'Love of money is the root of all evil'. Of course it was stated in the Bible and as rational people of the 21st Century we should (according to many around here) disregard anything written in the Bible and write it off as superstition and outdated mumbo jumbo. Except those same people fail to realise that although our technology has moved on rapidly from 2000 years ago the nature of man has not changed at all. That is why the holy text is still relevant today because man is still the same violent ape that he was 2000 years ago. For those who doubt this look no further than this story from Uganda (among others). When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca
  8. Hi Mate, Not sure I understood your post but are you saying that if I want you'll pay for a airfare to Uganda? All I have to do to collect is say I agree? When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca
  9. Not just in Uganda, it happens in various countries across Africa. It also follows African communities as they emigrate. A few years ago the decapitated body of a African child was found in the River Thames in London. When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca
  10. 'Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit.' Oscar Wilde When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca
  11. You might want to head over to the Bonfire then. When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca
  12. Creation, whatever that is, probably has a creator, but that doesn't say a whole lot about the universe of course. Ok, fire away I'm listening. How was the universe created and out of what? (and where did that what come from?) When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca
  13. Nonsensical "logic". As asked many times but not answered, where did the creator come from? If i knew the answer to that I wouldn't be sitting here pissing about on the internet but talking to Presidents. But you're just using my question in reverse, So Prof can you have a bash at explaining to me where the universe came from and how was matter created? When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca
  14. I'm not talking about a God of any religion but it seems to me that its logical that creation has a creator. When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca
  15. Ok thats your view, fair play. But getting away from Jesus, Muhammad et al, where did everything come from? I mean before the big bang. If there was no creator then how the the first matter appear and into what? When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca
  16. He's dimmer than an energy saving lightbulb. When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca
  17. He should respect other views and beliefs the same way you respect his? Hes an Atheist he has no belief, unless you consider atheism to be a belief system in which case that would be a religion in its own right. I respect his right to believe in nothing at all but I maintain the right to an opinion of my own. The difference is that I have not set up a series of angry hateful videos all over the internet decrying and denigrating those who chose to believe in no God. When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca
  18. Ignorant as in lacking respect for others views and beliefs. He talks rubbish about Christianity and spouts nonsense like comparing Obama to Jesus or the Devil. Starting an argument with 'Its well known' and following it up with a generalization of 260 million people is ignorant. Stating that Jesus is getting the Republican nomination is ignorant. He claims that Obama is a European by instinct, that is ignorant on so many levels is laughable. Ignorant of European culture and the political make up of the continent, not to mention an assumed political cohesiveness that simply does not exist regardless of a European parliment. He assumes that the rest of Europe follows the same system as the UK, yet another example of his ignorance. He throws statistics around like bird feed but cites no sources for them, one can only conclude that either he made them up or the source of his 'facts' are so unreliable as not to be cited. Or mor likely he is just ignorant of the fact that stats are worthless without intellectual provenance. His ignorance of statistical analysis leads him to believe that 83% of Americans believe that the Bible is the word or God, rather than 83% of respondents to whatever survey he is supposedly quoting from. Further to this his ignorance of the processes of critical thinking mean that he apparently has not asked any questions of the study sample or its potential bias not the data collection methodology. He simple starts his hate filled diatribe with a claim that attempts to manipulate the audiance into blind agreement with his emotive and irrational claims which he attempts to give validity to by ample use of unsupported statistical figures as 'evidence' for his shonky predjudices. he is the Atheist equivilent of the TV evanglical extremists that he hates so much. Seeing as he hates America and Europe maybe he will do us all a favour and bugger off to Afghanistan and tell the Taliban what he thinks of them in person, his final video would be his best. When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca
  19. This guy is a hate filled ignorant, attention seeking piece of shit. His views are abhorrant and based on nothing but blind hate for anyone who believes in God regardless of any other criteria. If he doesn't like America or the way you do politics then don't go there, maybe he'd prefer Godless China or the old Soviet system. When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca
  20. Meh. Don't think I know of any examples in Texas where someone was put in jail for a year for a performance that mocked Governor Parry. Just as well or the jails would be full. When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca
  21. You better straighten out Wikipedia then: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_genital_mutilation#Practising_countries Quote: "The practice persists in 28 African countries, as well as in the Arabian Peninsula. It is known to exist in northern Saudi Arabia, southern Jordan, northern Iraq (Kurdistan), and possibly Syria, western Iran, and southern Turkey."And since this thread is about a Saudi woman, I think it's a relevant analogy that female genital mutilation also exists in that country. You do realise that Wikipedia isn't a reliable source and is full of all kinds of nonsense. As you can find Africans in pretty much every country on earth its hardly suprising that FGM occurs in those communities. It is also a problem in the UK and several other countries in Europe, and shock horror it even occurs in the USA. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs241/en/ In fact until quite recently it was not an unusual practice among Christian women in the USA. http://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=annotation_672270&src_vid=-MZfqSpzKbw&v=pvX5J7lAv4g&feature=iv When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca
  22. Love it, quote of the month. When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca
  23. So then you believe in "cultural relativism", whereby no one has the right to criticize another's cultural practices? And therefore you approve of the muslim practice of cutting off the clitoris of young girls to prevent them from enjoying sex when they mature? That is NOT a Muslim practice, that is a African practice and a cultural practiced amoung some north Africans of all religions. When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca
  24. LMAO When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca
  25. Yes of course they can be, you know some of us guys have managed to evolve beyond pond life. When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca