Skyrad

So what firearms laws would you have? When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca

Yup. Just because the people voted it in doesn't mean that something that goes against the nation's constitution can be upheld. Just about every state had anti-homosexual laws on the books. Those were voted in by the people of the state when they were passed. Those laws were over turned when they were found to be unconstitutional. Do you still have your sarcastic reply or is it only when the cause that is in debate is something that you don't like? How long ago was the constitution written? That makes as much sense as people living their lives by rules written 1500 years ago. When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca

What do you think now Bill? When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca

Both should be in prison for long enough that owning a firearm isn't even a possibility, but thats for another thread. Yes I agree but that is in a utopian society not the one I live in unfortunatly so would you like to address the question set in the real world? When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca

So even violent career criminals and paedophiles should be allowed to own firearms??? When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca

So the peoples democratic decision is overturned by a state official. So much for the land of the free home of democracy. When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca

You just answered your own question. Do you do Johns social diary as well? So you'd advocate criminals legaly owning firearms? (Justin or John, hell anyone who wants to answer) When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca

Old fashioned police work. Get out from behind the computer and get out on the street. Making neat little lists of guns owned by the law-abiding, sure as heck doesn't help. Ok, I agree to a point and am willing to be swayed. But if there is no registration of firearms then what would distinguish between the legal owners and the illegal owners except when they're breaking the law? Would you advocate the scraping of all firearms laws? If not then what laws would you keep or introduce? When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca

Oh boy... I'm usually good at spotting such things but ... well ... this is a satire, right? LMAO Sureal! When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca

why not actually watch it instead? http://www.ogrish.com/archives/nick_berg_beheading_video_nick_berg_execution_video_May_25_2004.html Congratulations this thread has just become the most offensive I've ever seen in SC. When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca

not so much a case of luck, more a case of yet again the British army showing why they are generally accepted as the best trained, most dissiplined soldiers in the world.... somalia bay of pigs vietnam Killing more Brits than the Iraqi army did in Gulf War 1 ...... hang your heads in shame How about filling in the rest of your profile Dancergirl, Status: Registered User Registered: Jun 5, 2006, 3:10 PM Last Logon: Jun 12, 2006, 1:02 PM Local Time: Jun 12, 2006, 2:35 PM Posts: 55 (7.9 per day) Thats alot of activity in a short while eh? Glad you're on board but while I can only agree with... However I don't think that the attack on Americans is all that helpful or warranted. I don't feel that hang your head in shame is a valid or fair comment especialy as in Somalia the US was there to try and eleviate a humanitarian crisis and lost good men as result, what has the US got to be ashamed of there? Nothing. Brave men layed down their lives to do what they belived to be right, to help the people of Somalia while civillians watched the crisis on TV and felt bad until the next comercial break when they went and made a cup of tea. In light of this maybe you should re read your post again and re consider who should hang their head in shame. When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca

I suppose the America-haters would like to remove VE-day and VJ-day from the calendars. Gosh, is celebrating victory over mass-murderers, torturers and genocidal maniacs, really so darned horrible? Are we supposed to mourn for Adolph Hitler? Why would 'America haters' want to ban VE and VJ day??? America was only one of many countries that won Victory in Europe and Victory in Japan. When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca

So I repeat my question, what does he suggest in this situation. John when responding please remember to take in to consideration that 'Tis ain't Kansas Toto!' When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca

I can understand that you don't just shoot everyone who is carrying a gun during a routine patrol. But once an active firefight is in progress, then anyone holding a gun is the enemy. Any farmer who is just carrying a gun to protect his crops will get the hell away from a firefight and ditch his weapon. Anyone else sticking around armed, is a combatant. The soldiers shouldn't have to wait for the gunmen to raise their weapons and point them in their direction before shooting them. This policy is going to get soldiers killed. There is a cultral difference here that you don't seem to have taken into account. The farmers don't carry firearms to protect the crops so much as to protect themselves and their familys. So are you telling me that these men once the shooting starts and Taliban are all obver the placelooking for targets that they should throw down their guns and just hope thatthe bad guys don't shoot them????? Bloody hell, I never thought I'd see the day when JohnRich advocated rapid disarmament as an effective form of self defence Also British troops are used to stricter rules of engagement than there American counterparts mainly due to the fact that we've been fighting a 'War on Terror' since 1969 in urban enviroments as well as rural ones under the constant glare of the media spotlight, fully accountable to the law where each instance resulting in a shooting resulted in a inquiry. Consequently the fire discipline of the British soldier is a a higher standard than his contemparys elsewhere. When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca

So what would you suggest John? When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca

[URL]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=389956&in_page_id=1811[/URL] Moral of the story, don't fuck with the Parachute Regiment. [URL]http://www.army.mod.uk/para/[/URL] When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca

LOL....I did a similar post a few months ago when I was so wrecked that I didn't even know I'd posted until I saw it next day! When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca

hi Matt did you find that on the daily mail online by any chance? When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca

This article is about a United States statute prohibiting the use of the armed forces for law enforcement. For other uses see Posse comitatus (disambiguation). The Posse Comitatus Act is a United States federal law (18 U.S.C. § 1385) passed in 1878 after the end of Reconstruction. The Act was intended to prohibit Federal troops from supervising elections in former Confederate states. It generally prohibits Federal military personnel and units of the United States National Guard under Federal authority from acting in a law enforcement capacity within the United States, except where expressly authorized by the Constitution or Congress. The Posse Comitatus Act and the Insurrection Act substantially limit the powers of the Federal government to use the military for law enforcement. The original act referred only to the United States Army. The Air Force was added in 1956, and the Navy and the Marine Corps have been included by a regulation of the Department of Defense. This law is often mentioned when it appears that the Department of Defense is interfering in domestic disturbances. But I still don't get what you are pushing at. Do you mean you think the US faorces should police in Britan? Or do you mean the UK forces should police Britan or do you mean something else totaly? When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca

What does that mean??? When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca

LOL!!! I must admit, sometimes I enjoy the debate. And, even better, I've learned some things from our UK skydiving brethren.

I do belive its a blue moon tonight Scooby! When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca

My condolences to her family and friends. BSBD

LOL....Now it all makes sense When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca

Wow! Really???? OK, well I've decided that this coffee colour isn't doing it for me any longer... So from today I have decided that I am going to be black! When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca