lummy

I haven't seen anything about the Sheriff blaming the NRA, but I haven't read much about it today. I have read that he was shocked about all four of his officers inactions. Didn't he suspend the 4 and opened an investigation into their conduct too? I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1

This is going to play well with the " we need good guys with guns in school to protect against bad guys" argument The armed security guard, a Broward County sheriff assigned as school resource officer, waited outside the building while the shooting went on inside. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2018/02/22/armed-sheriffs-deputy-stayed-outside-florida-school-while-mass-killing-took-place/?utm_term=.6790705c893f I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1

I edited out the sarcasm. What has changed? If it isn't the gun laws, then the gun laws are the problem and more are not the fix. I don't that our gun laws are perfect, they do need improvement and more enforcement. But what else is the issue? People in the Europe and Canada have guns. What is the difference in the US? Derek V One change was the sunset of the assault weapons ban in 2004. How many mass shootings were there from 94-2004 and how many from 04 to now I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1

You're welcome. The job description made no mention of firearm training so I had to adjust the search parameters I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1

NYC School safety agents are not armed. They are also trained NOT to try and disarm an active shooter but rather get students and faculty to safety http://www.nytimes.com/1998/09/16/nyregion/new-era-as-police-prepare-to-run-school-security.html I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1

So there's a new dating site for Trump supporters. It looks like someone didn't look to see who they were putting on as their featured image, a convicted child sex offender Trump dating site pulls photo of convicted child sex offender from home page I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1

Fixed it for you.... I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1

Rut ROH 13 Russians indicted for interfering in US Presidential Election I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1

There really needs to be like buttons here!!! I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1

I couldn't stop laughing from reading Frederick Douglass' replies "Will you marry me? I'm dead for real and you're dead on the inside. I think it will work" I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1

I recall reading that Manafort was told to expect an indictment by FBI officials when they raided his home 2 months ago. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1

The only scary thing is that someone may just believe this is true, that he's the saviour, and start tossing nukes around I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1

you mean this? https://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/index.php?/topic/37332-gennylift-iv-heavy-delta-iv-heavy-clone/ I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1

the author of that article is purposely combining 2 different subsections of the law to mislead the reader into thinking that the FBI rewrote the law to shield Hillary. The author is falsly trying to claim that Comey implied there had to be intent to be grossly negligent. That is not the case. The law says that you either have to intentionally try to hurt the US by mishandling classified materials (sub sections A and B), or you have to be grossly negligent in handling the classified materials (section F) 18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information In Fact, Comey made 2 declarations. He said the following about both sections of the law I cited above: In other words, Hillary neither had any intent to harm the US by her actions, nor was she grossly negligent in her handling of classified materials. Comey also went on to support the decision by citing prior prosecutions that define what INTENT or grossly negligent would be and that Hillary's use did not fall into either subsection. FBI press release July 5 I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1

Why aren't you posting the laws that you say Hillary broke then? I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1

There is no filibuster Marc. They only need 50 votes plus Pence. They can't agree among themselves. The filibuster is still in place for legislative bills. The senate republicans only used the nuclear option for judicial nominations. That's why the senate was trying to repeal Obamacare using the budget reconciliation process. If they tried to push thru new legislation to repeal, they would then need 60 votes to close discussion I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1

I hope so. I hope it's not pandora's box. The problem we have here is the only time the left considers an adult to be in the presidency it has to be a Democrat. And that has been proven for a whole bunch of years. Not true, if Kasich or Rubio had gotten the R nomination, I would have voted for them over Clinton.. I would have also been fine with Romney if he had been elected. The world is not so black and white as you make it out Rush I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1

agreed I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1

ROT ROOOW Trump is under investigation for Obstruction of justice... I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1

Im pretty danged sure the campus offered her a place to speak that they could protect and keep secure. She turned that venue down in favor of an open plaza that couldn't be adequately secured. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1

Not true, it's called RRR week. In a ntushell, faculty are not allowed to introduce new material the week before finals. The time is to be used for review of already presented materials. Just because it's review week doesn't mean you don't have to attend the class. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1

He's already blaming the Dem's for not supporting it... wow.... I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1

Not to distract from the seriousness of this, but I was wondering about that charge as well I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1

Maybe the GOP will finally get their Death Panels I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1

The NY times has an article this morning explaining the cost savings in premiums. In a nutshell, the AHCA will drive up premiums so high for older people, that they will just drop out. No Magic in How G.O.P. Plan Lowers Premiums: It Pushes Out Older People I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1