Gravitymaster

I hope Gravitymaster reads that and comprehends it. David Frum is an elitist RINO. No wonder you like him.

David Frum is an elitist RINO.

AAAARRRGHH!!! Hulk need new foil hat! Uh, huh. I'm sure they didn't find out about the affair until AFTER the election. Someone needs a new schtick, perhaps up the ass.

I love how the Obama Admin. covered this up until after the elections. Bad politics for it to come out that your CIA Director can't keep it in his pants and has opened hmself up to blackmail. It might just remind people of another famous adulterer. I wonder what else we are going to find out about in the coming months.

Like you speak for all Australians. Get a grip.

But of course...why would anyone think it would be important for the CIA Director testify. What could he possibly know?

Sorry, I keep forgetting you need the emoticons.

If a man in that position allows himself to get into a position to be blackmailed, he should get fired. From what is known know, he is taking an "honourable" route. Did you have the same opinion about Clinton with regards to Lewinsky? Heh heh. Not with Bill. He was elected with all the world knowing he was a hound-dog. There was nothing secret to blackmail! Besides, he did not have sexual relations with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky. God, I love that man. Oh, the double standards and idiotic defenses. Reminds me of something my attorney would say.

That's pretty funny. I wonder how she came up with that title?

Taxes are general revenue and to be spent as government sees fit. Oh, you mean like Social Security? If your lected politicians decide that is aprt of it, then yes. If you don't like it, try and get a politician elected who will/can change it. In the mean time we have, according to you a GOP leadership who squandered north of a billion dollars on a campaign they couldn't win. Yet you think they would be the best fiscal choice. Either your logic is a little off, or you didn't mean something you said. Neither would be a huge surprise. So you are not capable of seeing the absurdity of your claim? Not really a surprise.

I don't understand. Isn't sex a private matter? Doesn't everyone lie about sex? How does this prevent him from doing his job?

If a man in that position allows himself to get into a position to be blackmailed, he should get fired. From what is known know, he is taking an "honourable" route. Did you have the same opinion about Clinton with regards to Lewinsky?

Sorry, I thought you an JClalor understood we were talking about since the election. That is what this thread is about isn't it? I didn't think you would try and expand the time frame to justify a failed Presidency.

Taxes are general revenue and to be spent as government sees fit. Oh, you mean like Social Security?

Very shortly, the resignation will be seen by the right as part of the Obama-Benghazi conspiracy. Lemme see if I understand. You are saying that someone who is having an affair can be forced to do something they don't want to do? You mean, like blackmail?

Not my fault that the "Party of No" retains control of the House. Yep, No more spending. Pisses you off doesn't it? Will piss the military off too if the House can't get its act together. The Military isgoing to have to deal with large cuts, also. Are you suggesting anarchy? A coup d'etat, maybe?

Complete nonsense. Winning an election requires more than just getting Republican votes. The number of registered Republicans is insufficient to win even if they all vote. Every single poll showed Romney increasing his share after his move way from the extreme position he took for the primaries and moved to the center. But please continue to push your position, it will guarantee that no Republican gets elected president. Bullshit. After the first debate, Romney was ahead. As he moved closer to the center by making statements such as wanting to keep parts of Obamacare, his numbers began to drop. 3 million Republicans who voted for McCain DID NOT vote for Romney. All we have to do at this point is just give Obama enough rope to hang himself. Once people begin to feel the pain of government cuts in their cheese, they will begin to take more responsibility for themselves and vote for the only viable alternative.

Not my fault that the "Party of No" retains control of the House. Yep, No more spending. Pisses you off doesn't it?

That's exactly the childish response I was expecting. Sore loser. Another childish response. Care to qualify for the nightly Trifecta? Get over yourself. Your guy lost fair and square, as he should have done. I Agee, he should have lost.. He had it all wrapped up until he went to the center the last few weeks. That really turned off the conservatives and they stayed home. Arrant Nonsense. There is no evidence to support that position. Losing has clearly deranged your mental processes. Why don't you take a lesson from rushmc and come back when you've returned to reality from cloud cuckoo land. It's so amazing when small minded insignificant people resort to personal attacks because they are just plain ignorant of facts. Not even so much as a warning. Your claim is simply not based in reality. You have no evidence whatsoever to back it up. By definition, that is delusional. Romney got 3 million Republican votes less than McCain. Obama got many fewer votes than in 2008. Tell us oh, great thinker, what do you think happened to those 3 million Republican votes? Talk about thinking not based in reality....

Well, except those that make a lot more and pay a lower percentage, Like Mr. Romney. I'd love to be able to afford his CPA. If you think Obama is going to get away with raising taxes on wealthy people, you better think again. Private CPA firms have brilliant people who will run circles around government. Everytime they raise taxes, there is always a loophole or it will result in businesses employing more Independent Contractors and Sub-Contractors. That's going to result in less revenues. Or they will just take their money off-shore and invest in other economies.

Hopefully you can still rejoice when the unemployment numbers come in over the next few months. Oh, are you and your ilk in for some really big surprises. How's that stock market looking to you? Happy about it, too? I know the Obama defenders will search the web trying to find their usual justifications but, we all know why it's collapsing.

Do you know what the political system without government is called ? It's called Anarchy. I suggest you go to northern Mali to see for yourself how that works out ? You do believe in the constitution, don't you. Now who do you think protects those rights ? Quite a leap from criticism of an overbloated government that tries to do everything to total anarchy, don't you think?

I've never thought too much of a national sales tax. Penalizing people for an important part of economic activity seems like a bad idea. I've never had it explained to me why the flat tax is bad. Everyone is invested. Those who make more, pay more. We eliminate lots of useless dead wood...excess accountants, excess tax attorneys, excess IRS beurocracy, excess paperwork...you don't even need tax returns. 10% monthly is the same as 10% annually. What's to report? Do away with deductions; it's not the government's business what you do with your money, anyhow. Seems straight forward to me. ETA: Did a quick search to find cons to a flat tax. Two were brought up. One is that IRS employees would lose their jobs. I considered that a 'pro'. The other is that government dead wood costs so much, they need to tax higher earners to survive. Seems related to the excess IRS problem to me. So, I am still a proponent of the flat tax. I would also add that it would give the government less control over peoples lives because once everyone shares in the same pain, there would be a greater demand to reduce spending. I still think the best thing to do in the meantime is to reduce the size of the IRS and have people write out a check every month to pay what theyowe in payroll and income taxes. Taking out of workers checks only makes high taxes seem more palatable.

If you're representative of the rest of the losing side that actually sounds about right. Actually your need to twist what people say to satisfy your own ego is about right. I couldn't have a better example. Thanks. I could remind you that this conversation started with you categorising a person's interest in equal rights as "ME ME ME!" but honestly, what would be the point? And I could tell you to read the thread again, but what's the point?

Actually, you are cracking me up with your pathetic defense of government. But, that's what we have come to expect from liberals.