Gravitymaster

He learned it from you.

Some perceive any criticism as racist, homophobic, or just plain hate due to their Pavlovian reactions which causes an inability to comprehend the message.

Surprise.....Surprise.......

How does it feel being a supporter of the unrestricted murder of babies? (this comment is meant to be as stupid as the one you made here. As I dont really think you support murder) anyway Just so you know The TX law does not outlaw abortion It requires the procedure be done in a certified surgical hospital and not a back closet slaughter house Why are you against the best situational procedure for women? He's too busy dancing with glee.

Well, I hope NOT. There's been a trial, he was found not guilty. That should be the end of it. Don't need a federal "civil rights" suit, a civil suit for damages, or whatever. Just let it go. Agree 100%. There is nothing to be gained by continuing to stoke emotions. Let it go.

I was thinking the same thing the other day while lynching a few darkies for sitting at the whites only counter in my local Five & Dime.

Pretty sure it was sarcasm from GM.

The calls for civil rights charges have begun Yep, while the lawyers sit back and lick their chops. Predators on people's misery. Really a disgusting group of humanoids.

I agree that 20 years is pretty excessive. I would have thought maybe 60 days and then some anger counseling would be more productive. Did you have a point?

It has some dancing with glee. kansansforlife.wordpress.com/.../budget-bill-has-abortion-supporters-danci...

I would not be surprised by a civil suit from the family, and also would not be surprised to see federal civil rights charges. There are already rumors of the latter. Just google: zimmerman federal charges Jclalor is already on record that no federal charges will be filed. I'm just trying to clarify his position on a civil suit and the resulting outcome. Some just cant be satisfied until they feel vengeance has been wrought on an innocent man and he has been destroyed. Just more of the usual hate from the left.

Why? Because you have mountains of evidence saying GZ is guilty that the jury didn't have? The burden of liability is much less in civil court, a jury need only find a person more likely than not to have acted negligent. it's also going to be nice to see all usual suspects that claim the system work, applaud the civil verdict. So we have you officially on record proclaiming a civil case will be filed and GZ will lose?

Yeah, unlike the lying, deceitful, convict at all costs, scumbags in the prosecutors office who know what they are talking about.

Why? Because you have mountains of evidence saying GZ is guilty that the jury didn't have? Nope, because some people just cannot come to terms with the fact they are just plain wrong and that their thinking is defective. They will constantly seek out justification and couldn't care less about the truth or the reality.

It must be of great comfort to you to know that if your Lord Jesus were here today, that he would be in the Zimmerman camp offering comfort to the transgressed. Once again, you apparently have confused me with someone else.

If you think GZ was given an order by "the Police" to stop following TM, then you are not understanding why happened. Too many people let their emotions blind them to the truth. The Jury heard all the evidence and decided GZ was justified. End of story.

Hopefully, if TM's family files it, they will spend big bucks and then lose. Especially if their suit is funded by the Black mafia. They need to get over the fact that their child could have just gone home and watched the rest of the basketball game and none of this would have happened. Instead, he chose to confront this "cracker" and he lost his life because of it. I expect many things the prosecution knew but did not release will now come out. This is the pathetic state of our legal system because of the whores who practice law.

Dershowitz: Zimmerman Prosecutors 'Should Be Disbarred' Friday, 12 Jul 2013 06:22 PM By Bill Hoffmann Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz says the prosecutors in the George Zimmerman murder trial should be charged with "prosecutorial misconduct" for suggesting the defendant planned the fatal shooting of Trayvon Martin. "That is something no prosecutor should be allowed to get away with … to make up a story from whole cloth," Dershowitz told "The Steve Malzberg Show" on Newsmax TV. "These prosecutors should be disbarred. They have acted absolutely irresponsibly in an utterly un-American fashion." Zimmerman, a 29-year-old neighborhood watch volunteer, is charged with gunning down Martin, 17, as the two fought following a confrontation in the gated Sanford, Fla., community where Zimmerman lives — an act the defendant said was in self-defense. In the prosecution's final argument on Friday, lawyer John Guy said Zimmerman deliberately followed Martin and "shot him because he wanted to." Dershowitz called Guy's statement "such speculation. How does he get into the mind of Zimmerman? He hasn't cross-examined him, he hasn't met him. "To ask the jury to believe that is to ask the jury to convict based on complete and utter speculation and that's not the way the law operates." A day earlier, prosecutor Bernie de la Rionda said Zimmerman — whom he labeled a "wannabe cop" — "followed" and "tracked" Martin after profiling him as a criminal. Dershowitz said not only should Zimmerman have not been charged with second-degree murder, but prosecutors should not have pushed to have manslaughter and child abuse added to the list of possible jury verdicts. "[It's] utterly irresponsible. … The idea that the prosecution can try the case on a murder theory and then, at the last minute, substitute manslaughter, even though it seems to be permitted generally under Florida law — it's a big mistake to allow it in a case like this,” he said. "And then the very idea of even suggesting child abuse in a case like this is so irresponsible." Dershowitz praised the closing argument of defense lawyer Mark O'Mara. "He did the right thing by being methodical and factual because this is a case where the prosecution's case is all emotion and the defense case is all factual," the famed civil-rights lawyer said. "Emotionally, obviously everybody can identify with a young, unarmed 17-year-old who ends up dead, and emotionally, as President [Barack] Obama said, he's all of our children." Dershowitz — whose clients have included Claus von Bulow, Mike Tyson, Patricia Hearst, and former televangelist Jim Bakker — said the case has "reasonable doubt" written all over it. "Nobody knows who started the initial physical encounter, who threw the first blow — and if you don't know that you have to have a reasonable doubt," he said. "Nobody knows for sure who screamed, 'Help me, help me.' You have to have a reasonable doubt about that. Nobody knows for sure who was on top and who was on bottom, though the overwhelming forensic evidence suggests that Zimmerman was on the bottom having his head banged by a younger, stronger man. You have to have reasonable doubt there."

Exactly.

You can't argue with them. How many times do they have to be told the same thing over and over and over?

If that's what you think, you have problems understanding what happened. Something all the GZ haters shared in common. It is not illegal to get out of your cars to see where someone went after you had just called 911. Especially when you are a member of Neighborhood Watch and have vowed to protect your neighbors. Had TM actually been afraid, he would have just continued on home. Instead, he doubled back and sucker punched GZ, breaking his nose. He the jumped on top of GZ and started pounding his head on the sidewalk. I'd say TM got just exactly what he asked for.

More scumbags from our pathetic legal system. It's all about winning to these assholes. Justice be damned.

Some of us have called this the cluster fuck what it is from the beginning. Glad to see the Unions are starting to wise ip . I wonder how long it will take for some of our resident Hopium advocates to wake the fuck up?

And you know this, how? Seriously? Probably not in a world where hair splitting, distorting facts and taking thing out of context is not only encouraged but admired.

So 30 seconds before a woman gives birth, you are ok with a doctor invading her womb with a pair of scissors and snipping the babies spinal cord?