SudsyFist

I heard another one, but I've misplaced the link. Perhaps I'll go hunting for it in the morning.

Your logic there isn't all that waterproof, itself. Let's take, for instance, some public figure whom you might support to some extent, one who has been the subject of an investigation of one sort or another. Perhaps the President, for instance, and maybe the 9/11 inquiry. Now, of course he had nothing to hide, right? Then, by your logic, he should've just let the Commission just "waltz right in," right? Is that, in fact, what happened? If not -- if he didn't let them just "waltz right in" -- then does that implicate that improprieties were obviously there? The fact is that just about anyone hates and resists when someone else is telling them what to do, shoving rules down their throat. Listen to a lot of what people in this forum have to say about other countries' (or, heaven forbid, the UN's) having input in the US's activities. It gets pretty vehement, actually. I'm not saying that there were absolutely no WMD's present, because we cannot know for sure. But I will contest the notion that WMD's absolutely were present, especially when supported by nothing but weak arguments (resistance to inspections, the fact that nothing's been found being evidence that it's being hidden , etc.). We just don't know.

Along similar lines (and probably posted here before): Ben Folds covers Dr. Dre's Bitches Ain't Shit

oh stop! (and she likes it only if it's whipped cream and syrup!) So if twelve of us stand around her in a circle with Reddi Whip and Hershey's locked and loaded...

YOU LIKE BUKAKKE!!!

I've had the delightful opportunity to stare down a GA pilot from ~300ft away whilst hitting line stretch, non-verbally communicating with him my thoughts on his ripping through our jump run (the good ol' double-bird). For some reason, this video seemed disappointingly tame to me. Glad no one became an involuntary hood ornament on that one. And the lesson learned is a familiar one: Look both ways before crossing the street!

Well, yeah, but it'd be nice to somehow keep us movin' and groovin' during the obligatory intermissions.

And hereforth shall the gracing of a young lass with a sudsy tadpole facial be referred to as "doused with miso soup."

Please, please let us down in SD join in the fun! Quakes are much more fun from 200ft AGL... even little 4.0 teasers!

You like bukakke!

Windcatcher's icon is pretty much self-explanatory. Nudge, nudge... wink, wink...

My mind's distracted and diffused, My thoughts are many miles away: They lie with you when you're asleep, And kiss you when you start your day.

I Like Bukakke

Like a memory it falls Soft and warm, continuing, Tapping on my roof and walls...

Fuckin' A. What a great album. Actually have been listening to Simon & Garfunkel for the last hour or so...

Right-click, select "Save Image As..." You can also click the "All Sizes" link above each photo on its respective page. That will give you access to the hi-res original.

Did I miss something???

Nice thing about being a flexible guy is that there are only ZERO areas where help would be needed. Where's my peanut butter?

Fixed. Just for you.

Oh, shit... *sigh* (back to despondence)

That's from *fist* to shoulder, missie! OK, as much as you all made me giggle in a time of desperate despondence, I've failed at this particular singalong. What I've learned about the current state of these forums:80's? Check.Classic Rock? Check.EDIT (for NWFlyer): Nursery Rhymes? Check.French Jazz? Go directly to hell. Do not pass Go. Do not collect $200. You'd be better off pissing Johnny Hallyday lyrics into the wind.Oh, and if I'm gonna go off on that scheisse thang, it'll be in clear, unadulterated American English.

I like your attitude; wish there were more like you.

I thought that's what secretaries were for.

If my limited understanding is correct, isn't it the *plaintiff* who brings the case before the court, and not these so-called "activist judges"? If so, how is it that they were trying to get what you allege as their candidate into the presidency? The people bring cases to the court. The court usually reviews the case and makes a decision. If the decision is out of line, for whatever reason, there's an appeals process, is there not? Checks and balances. What's your real beef here?

Holy shit, you just made me feel old.