davjohns

I happened to be vacationing near a tunnel just before AFF. Did it. It helped. I've thought about a tunnel co-located with a DZ, but it seems rare. You need a remote location for a DZ and a high-traffic area for a tunnel. Hard to put together. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

My understanding of this is that experts are divided on what evidence is relevant and what it means. One side is just very vocal and supported by environmentalists. It is reasonable to think that human activity has an effect on the environment. Whether the environment self-corrects easily or not is debatable. Let's face it, the study sample is small. There is no control sample. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

That's awful! How do they know which areas to target? I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Make him show ID! Make him show ID! And the death penalty discussion is kind of moot with this one. Did the cop get fired for having a gun on the job? Anyone stand their ground? I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I remember walking across the LZ (where hangglider pilots hang out) one morning after a Halloween party. It looked like Jonestown the morning after...bodies everywhere. As I approached a pickup truck, a young lady in half-dressed mode popped up out of the bed and looked about in panick. I said in a calm, clear voice, "It's ok. You're fine. It's only 6:30. Go back to sleep." She looked relieved as she laid back down. I'm guessing boogies are similar. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I've never been to a boogie. Really curious what events lead to the comment you quote. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

She tried to sex me to death. Nearly succeeded. And refused to try again! I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

My first thought as well. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Damn, dude. I generally find you amusing. But sometimes you walk up to that line, look at it, smirk and jump over with both feet and a big old grin. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

There was video. It was going to hit the media. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

You and your fancy chocolates. You sure know how to work me! hey hey you two keep your personal sexy time outta my HEAD "being skymama" isn't something all of us can achieve. FIFY I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Wow...that place is nicer than places I've gone on vacation. After 28 years in the Army, I've decided I want to retire as a prisoner in Norway. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Sigh...please read. I have made clear my position that killing is wrong, but sometimes (regretfully) the last option we have as a society. It should never be approached flippantly, and should come with some introspection to where society might help prevent things that develop into these aberant individuals. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

1. No real comment. I've been fixed for years, tested by the Army regularly and serial monogamist. I haven't seen a condom in years. I remember them as being an interruption. 2. I have never understood a man not caring if the woman 'got hers'. I thought that was the point of the exercise. It's the biggest rush in life in my book. And if it's described as 'work' at all...someone's doing it wrong. 3. If she is able to answer questions, you aren't done. If you are able to ask questions...indeed, if your mind isn't completely at rest...something isn't right. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I don't. That was just my thoughts on the matter. However, I think this guy has clearly abrogated his right to live and society would be better off without him in existance. When reading his story, I find my heart and mind are in one accord on this matter. I obviously have no authority to make it a reality. Please read about him and then see if I'm being dismissive or if he has made himself so repugnant to humanity that my reaction is legitimate. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Had to look him up. Purely emotional response is that I would prefer that he be dead. Purely cognitive response is that I prefer that he be dead. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Had to go there, did you? I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Absolutely. Wendy P. And to be fair, there are fields where the standard is set by women. The Japanese have long used women in factories working with small parts because women are more adept at it. There are several professional areas that spring to mind where I would expect women's inherent strengths to prevail. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

but they do vote Get back in the other thread! :) I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I do not believe your first statement is correct. This is only concerning LWOP for juveniles. It is unclear how widely or narrowly the case would be decided but it would certainly not apply to all case of people serving LWOP. In the second case the SCOTUS has already decided the the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment when applied to juveniles (Roper v. Simmons). They have also decided it is cruel and unusual to sentence the mentally retarded to death. Thanks for the correction. I did not mean to imply that all LWOP would be commuted. Clearly just the juveniles. Then, the question is, how far behind is that for adults? I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

You just cost me part of my morning coffee! :) Hysterical that you put those together. I didn't think about it. But...if ya gotta go...that's not a bad way to go. And think of the bragging rights the survivor has. "I once sexed someone to death", is just hard to top. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Some lotions use base ingredients that register as plastic explosives with the detection devices. Sorry. I kept getting 'randomly' searched in airports. They would stop me to pull everything out of my bag. I'm military and often travel with only a carry-on (can't afford to chase lost bags) and last minute bookings. One day, I got tired of 'random' searches every stop. I told the girl to place an entry in her computer that I was a vendor of adult toys and carried a bag full of them. If they stopped me again, I would pull every adult toy out, turn it on, and lay it out on the table in full view of everyone to show that I was not a terrorist. I don't think she did it, but I have never been randomly selected since. I have yet to be selected for pat down. I have a plan if I am. I will explain to the guy that I'm polysexual and very sensitive. Everything he does will elicit an appreciative groan or sigh. I'll pull a full on 'When Harry Met Sally' Meg Ryan fake orgasm on him. I can't think of any way this is illegal behavior on my part, but it will bring me so much joy recounting the story to people. And if I could get others to do it... I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I think I saw one answer I could agree with in this whole thread. I'm an oddball. Definitely a lesbian trapped in a man's body. If she is open, relaxed and ready to give as well as she gets, it will be good. If she can enjoy giving as well as receiving, there are no worries. A friendly competition (no pressure) to make the other enjoy it more is just a win-win scenario. We can figure out the specific places, pressures, positions, etc together with honest feedback. Preferences are fine. Hangups are not. Feedback is great. Criticism is not. Mutual satisfaction is the goal. Selfishness is out. Feel free to scream, thrash and shake. I'll help. Long, sensual ramp-up, many prolonged crescendos with periods of playfulness, intimacy, sensuality and exploration, relaxed discussion, and returns to favored parts are all on the menu. Quickies, favors, exotic locations, etc are all fine. Just make sure everyone wins. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

This is my concern: Headline - Young killers serving life without parole may get chance at freedom The Supreme Court, in a case involving two 14-year-olds, will consider whether such sentences are cruel and unusual. A California bill allowing parole for juvenile murderers will be addressed this week. I read these two cases. If the SCOTUS declares life without to be cruel and unusual, all LWOP sentences get commuted automatically. This is what happened with Charles Manson. The California courts thought SCOTUS declared the death penalty to be cruel and unusual. All death row inmates had their sentences commuted. That's why Manson keeps going before parole boards. So, in the case of juveniles, we face the possibility that they can commit the most heinous of crimes, and expect to return to society rather than receive the death penalty or LWOP? Concerning. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I'm having trouble finding statistics on how many prisoners are released after a LWOP sentence. I'm finding individual instances, but no large scale stats. Then, I found this article by someone opposing LWOP. It seems that people who receive life sentences and are later released (apparently someone has the stats) are less likely to be repeat offenders compared to other sentences. ???? I find that a bit disturbing. They are arguing that people who committed crimes heinous enough to receive life sentences are really not that bad. She does cite at least 285 people in Pennsylvania who were released after life sentences. That number is also disturbing to me. http://sentencingproject.org/doc/publications/inc_federalsentencingreporter.pdf I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.