marks2065

although my net worth is positive my debt is a little large at about $500,000. this has been reduced, to this point, by a few hundred thousand over the last 6 years but i imagine it will grow again because of the times. how much it will grow depends on who is elected. my feelings is that it will grow larger(or shrink slower) if Obama is elected because of his plans like health care. i am an employerer that already supplies health care but i imagine the extra tax burden will cost me.

no you are wrong read this www.visalaw.com/01mar2/12mar201.html Obama's mam did spend time outside the us and that would make Obama not a citizen

there is a little difference. McCain wasn't screwing a black chick but Obama may have been born in Kenya and may be a citizen there. when asked to produce the documents Obama gave the short registered birth certificate not the long certified birth certificate. doesn't that make you wonder?

Sounds to me you dont read body language very well. You must get conned very easily. Oh thats right you voted for the Shrub... twice if this was about the vp debate it was her hair in her eye. as far as the vote for Bush well that was a good choice because of the times. i still feel that not all of what bush has done is bad or had happened during his term was his fault. the dems had alot to do with what has happened also. the problem isn't rep or dem its the inability to work together and accept blame for what they have done. Franks is a perfect example of not exepting blame for what he has done.

How can I believe him now? McCain - "I won't overspend" - then overspends Obama - "I'll spend like a drunken sailor" - then spends like a ship of drunken sailors there's no good choice from a fiscal perspective, and even if there was, it wouldn't matter since Congress would spend/spend/spend no matter who the pres is if mcCain is pres then he has to get congress to help him spend and they are dem majority. if Obama gets to be pres then he has congress to help him spend with nothing to stop him. and if the senate gets 60 dem seats watch out.

we probably should get used to this shit. it is going to get worse under a complete left controled government.

the best educated people are the ones that ask questions and listen to the answers.

I might also just vote 'present' McCain gave me nothing new (He could have closed the deal by just voting against the bailout and playing on that the whole debate). Another liberal like GWB, just easier to listen to. Obama wouldn't answer a single hypthetical "what would do in this scenario" - he continued to note that the government under him would be omniscient and he'd be able to diffuse any and all situations before they became a problem. The first crisis that hits this guy he'll waste months looking for the scapegoat that ruined his 'plan' while not working the problem he has in front of him. But, if they get in this time, that's the dem's plan for the first term anyway - any issue comes up, blame the last pres and not deal with it. It'll get them a 2nd term probably o come on Obama will make a phone call or write a letter like he has said he has done on several ocassions. he won't actually do anything but he will call and wright. P.S. obama might vote present to make sure we mow he was there

Well that says all that needs to be said about that. Ever thought of getting your "news" from something a tad more balanced??? i have known about this before the dnc and may have some validity. if Obama's mom was in kenya when Obama was born he would be a citizen of kenya not of the US and that his mom registered the birth in the states only makes him a citizen not a natural born citizen.the US law states that if one parent is a citizen of onother country and they are born in that country they become a citizen of that country not of the US.

this has been in the works for a while. his father was a citizen of onother country and if barrack was born there the he would have been a naturalized citizen of that country. since you have to be a naturalized citizen of the US to be president then if this is true Obama would not be eligible to be president. so far Obama has not produced the long version of his birth certificate only his short registered version.

you mean Barrack hussien Obama? imagine that, a president that has a name that sounds like the guy behind 911.

sounds to me like you meant Obama aint giving his real agenda

if it affects the way he would do things as president, yes it is important, if it doesn't let it go. but we don't know until we have the full story. if Obama didn't want his life opened for all to see he should have stayed home and not run for president. Why don't just just ask the poster in another thread who posted something like " ... he's hiding something, I just don't know what it is ...." or similar ? He was skeptic, too. Question: Is it mandatory condition for a potential US president to let everybody read in his book of life? To be vitreous? From date of birth until the entrance of Oval Office? What does it mean to you "1/3 of his adult life..." ? Perhaps about +/-9 yrs. If he spent 9 years in Goa singing Hallelujah and smoking tasty hand-rolled joints, who's biz is that? G.W. Bush hid a whole lot more than Obama. Still does. Did you berate Bush? (If so, I don;t recall seeing it). this is not between bush and obama this is between McCain & obama. i don't see McCain hiding things at least not to this point.

would you rather find out now or after it's to late? ' I'm sure there are a bunch of incorrect and possibly fraudulent registrations. Does that mean the organization itself is fraudulent, or maybe just overworked or careless? Fraud is criminal. Carelessness is not. but maybe we should find out just to be sure

would you rather find out now or after it's to late?

KGB - That surely will alleviate forthcoming discussions with Russia. One only can hope, McCain will not participate in these discussions. i can only hope Obama doesn't get in these talks. the guy has no understanding of foriegn policy and Biden has been wrong on most ocasions on foriegn policy.

to bad the left is to blind to see what is forming with this election. Obama and Biden have tryed to slowly squeeze our rights and with a poss 60 dem vote in the senate Obama will have free raine to do what he wants and we will all pay for it later by having less rights in a moore socialized country.

if it affects the way he would do things as president, yes it is important, if it doesn't let it go. but we don't know until we have the full story. if Obama didn't want his life opened for all to see he should have stayed home and not run for president. Why don't just just ask the poster in another thread who posted something like " ... he's hiding something, I just don't know what it is ...." or similar ? He was skeptic, too. Question: Is it mandatory condition for a potential US president to let everybody read in his book of life? To be vitreous? From date of birth until the entrance of Oval Office? What does it mean to you "1/3 of his adult life..." ? Perhaps about +/-9 yrs. If he spent 9 years in Goa singing Hallelujah and smoking tasty hand-rolled joints, who's biz is that?

Other than their PROVEN HISTORY of fraud, you mean? When was the fraud trial that produced the guilty verdict? john , if you were hit in the head with a hammer 4 or 5 times but didn't get an arrest or conviction, would you still put your head in the same spot agin? just because Obama has taught these guys about laws and how to get through the loopholes doesn't make them not guilty, just not guilty in the eyes of the law. remember OJ was found inocent would you like to be alone with him and a knife? Acorn has consistantly been involved with the law for alot of different reasons and has a reputation of going to extremes, therefore we need to be aware of their presence and question the validity of their actions.

i didn't like them getting time limits so small. lets make it 2-3 hours long, up to 10-15 min talks, and spread over several nights. lets get the details not just the cover story.

He is only doing it to piss you and rushmc off... or to hide something. i am always scepticle about people that hide things. my life, which is far from perfect, and has things that don't make me look so good, is not something that i would cover up. what is Obama covering up?

Other than their PROVEN HISTORY of fraud, you mean? Why isn't law enforcement working to find and prosecute those that sign the fraudulent voter registration forms? If it can be PROVEN to be ACORN staff, they should be prosecuted. If ignorant righties are deliberately handing in falsified forms, and ACORN passes along these forms, how is that ACORNs fault? The Rs are caging votes again, without any investigation or prosecution occuring. The Rs are doing everything they can to purge the voter rolls in the key battleground states. They target poor and minority neighborhoods that are likely to vote D. The Rs post reps to challenge voters in these neighborhoods. Do you righties approve of the deliberate actions designed to REDUCE the number of people voting? If so, why? only the fruads. also if you get caught trying to vote more than once and found guilty you should loose your right to vote.

he should. if i did that i would be going to jail.

lets just say for arguments sake that Obama does have some to all of the values of Ayers, reznick, the rev wright, and acorn.lets also say he has covered hos true agenda as best as possible to get elected. the swing is to the dem's right now and they will poss have a 60 senator vote in the senate (fillabuster proof majority)and a majority in the house. if Obama is leaning to the corrupt side this whole situation would be a dissaster for us. a radical as president and the power in congress to make any changes he wants would lead us to a very bad future and a government that would be uncontrolable. the whole idea of the way our government was set up was to never let one faction be in complete control, and until now no side has ever had 100% control. we are leaning towards a very dangerous and uncontrolable situation in the gov that we may not be able to fix. not even when the rep's held the majority in congress did they have total control nor did i want them to have it. vever before have we had the media so one sided to one candidate. this situtation has disaster wrote all over it. we are real close to being the USSR(united states socialist republic) and not the USA. i think any president needs to have their backround checked and double checked, but even more so because of Obama's ties to radicals and the power he may have with a dem controled congress with a fillabuster proof senate. where will the balance be and how will we as americans control it or fix it if it becomes the monster it is looking like it can become?