Coreece

So, do you not realize that this right here is nothing but petty name calling simply being used to denigrate and minimize. I honestly felt that "alarmists" was the best term to use. It wouldn't have been as accurate (or fair) if I had said the left, liberals, democrats or even sincere climate change activists/scientists, since emotional bullshit like this doesn't really help their cause as I've already illustrated - and I think they know that. I'd suspect that when they watch this stuff they look around to make sure nobody's looking and then roll their eyes. And again with the hypocrisy, you crack me up. How many times have you called people deniers, even in this very thread? And I didn't hear you calling out John when he said it, or the thousand times Bill says it. He even calls them Type I II or III, as if it's some type of disease, surely that's not petty name calling used to denigrate and minimize right? Are you really that blinded by your bias that you can't see even that? I mean honestly, I don't really give a shit about all that, I just think it's remarkable that after all this your big beef with me is my use of the word "alarmist." And then on top of that, you actually called Greta immature and that she was filled with foolishness, lol. I mean, wtf happened to you bro? You really need to stop digging. Lol, you've got to be kidding me. This has got to be like a record for the most amount of hypocrisy displayed in one thread. I simply voiced my criticism and then you attacked me with your ad hom without providing any rational thought of your own. Please, just put the shovel down bro. Right, and if it was some conservative kid expressing their feelings about abortion, he'd be a "smirk-face little prick."

Lol, you're so twisted in knots right now that you're the one actually criticizing her. And this kind of illustrates my point. As I've already said, for me this was never really about Greta. Where have I honestly criticized her? This was always about how the alarmists, media, etc., are taking advantage of her, whether it's her youth, immaturity, foolishness or whatever else YOU want to call it. And it illustrates another point - People like you and John say she's just "a small teenager," or "she's just young, immature and foolish." And then when I call people out for taking advantage of that, the goal posts are moved and suddenly she becomes this intelligent woman acting on her own volition that could be married and have a successful career and bla bla bla, etc., etc. You guys crack me up.

And..... another lame insult. The list of things that upsets you and makes you type nonsense on your keyboard just keeps on growing.  And there's more of that hypocrisy I was talking about. You were the one that resorted to ad hom as usual, simply because you can't handle any legitimate criticism of the left. Get over yourself.

When I hear mindless, programed comments like this, I understand why the creators of South Park depict Canadians with their craniums detached from their mouths.

I can't even stomach some of this BS, I don't even want to try anymore. They come in here talking about how the right is bullying this poor, little "small teenage girl" - and then when you call out the alarmists for taking advantage of her, suddenly she's this sophisticated 16 year-old woman that could be married and have a record deal or a sporting contract, or who knows what else, maybe even raising a family of her own, yet this sophisticated self-respecting woman of power can't be criticized for going on and acting out like a child on the world stage? And for me, it's not even about Greta or arguing against climate science - it's about how the alarmists are just using her along with all their other unnecessary emotional BS tactics - and none of it helps, if anything it just entrenches both sides even further into their respective flavor of shit. And then there was Nick Sandmann, who didn't even say a damn word, and actually tried to diffuse the situation by gesturing to his friends to tone it down so as not to exacerbate the situation, but suddenly he's the one that's being disrespectful to adults, suddenly he's the "smirk-face little prick," suddenly he's the new MAGA mega-asshole of the week - give me a break. It's all just a bunch of partisan bullshit dripping with hypocrisy - and nobody really gives a shit because apparently the end justifies the means.

So what, a U.S based news outlet created 20 years ago by Chinese Americans is a "foreign news source" just because they're Chinese? Would it be troubling to you if Hispanic/Arab Americans created a news source to highlight the anti-religious/human rights atrocities going on in their countries of ethnic origin, and then supported the left because they felt liberals/democrats would be more supportive to their cause? And let's be perfectly clear, the pro Trump ads benefit Epoch a hellava lot more than they do Trump - they were basically investments that in the end served as advertisements for their own brand.

No, I think she's serious in her convictions.

I've already explained to you numerous times about what I think of the whole "think of the children" type arguments, which is exactly what this is - just more unnecessary emotional BS.

So, what's with the name calling? She is not a troll It's clear she's being used as a troll and if you can't see that, I'd suppose you're just blinded by your bias and hatred for the right.

Are you OK with ANY child being used as a troll?

The right wingers leveraged her message beyond anything her promoters could have hoped to achieve on their own. I'm not surprised that you're OK with them using a sick child as a troll.

Hehe...you got the tail wagging the dog. Media knew she would be a hit and promoted her. As usual it worked. Using a sick child to promote their message like this says more about them than their message.

A twisted reality.

Ya it usually seems to be the lefties - and I don't really remember you ever calling them out on it. But then again maybe John was serious about banning garlic, you never really know with that guy.

Ya, I thought that was a bit uncalled for. While your descriptive post may have not been representative of most democrats, or even a lot of liberals, I wouldn't say that it was a far-fetched representation of the far-left. They're just not as organized and artless as the far right, so it's a bit harder to put a finger on them.

Oh, I thought all your problems would've been solved when Wendy left. . .

Did I just get Roxy Rolled?

Quack, Quack, Quack. . .and Quack.

Those sound like red tier headlines:

There is nothing we can do now but pray.

Hey! That's my asshole line. Ya, that's why I said it!

Yep, just as I suspected!

Is seems your greenie flare is becoming a bit more radiant. Does it glow in the dark too!

You may want to talk to Weber about that since he's the one that brought it up.

Ya man, whatever you want.