-
Content
9,632 -
Joined
-
Days Won
6 -
Feedback
0%
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Dropzones
Gear
Articles
Fatalities
Stolen
Indoor
Help
Downloads
Gallery
Blogs
Store
Videos
Classifieds
Everything posted by Coreece
-
Hill
-
enemy
-
Not everyone can just jump into an airplane and bug out to some bolt-hole in Tokelau.
-
I guess that they are not as popular as hoped
Coreece replied to JerryBaumchen's topic in Speakers Corner
You wish In your dreams! -
I guess that they are not as popular as hoped
Coreece replied to JerryBaumchen's topic in Speakers Corner
shhhh, don't tell Coreece - he has a weird obsession about them. At this point it looks more like you have an obsession with me. -
I guess that they are not as popular as hoped
Coreece replied to JerryBaumchen's topic in Speakers Corner
Savages -
Nothing about this is a protest. (NSFW Racial Expletives)
Coreece replied to turtlespeed's topic in Speakers Corner
Liberals cry enough as it is, no tear gas needed. -
I think that should be baddest assed. The worst bottocked is also acceptable, but may not give an accurate impression.
-
Ya so rat me out to the governess. All I said was that democrats are desperate and posted a couple pics of maga masks and black trump supporters - big deal, woe is me.
-
Good post, tho I'd hope that even a crooked cop's hypocrisy goes only so far and would report that type of crime regardless.
-
That just means that even if your ad blockers aren't blocking ads, they are still blocking access to your data that would be used to determine relevant ads.
-
Just keep in mind that It is demonstrated time and again that when there are grey areas available in charging and sentencing then black or white has a lot to do with it. That's kind of what I was referring to earlier. A sexual relationship between 17 and 18 year olds is a grey area, but most people aren't going to take offense if it seems "normal" to them. But as soon as it's a relationship they don't approve of, they get to rack up the charges even if if they agree it was consensual?
-
Don't confuse law with justice. Would you like fuzzy boundaries on the age to drive? pilot a plane? buy and drink booze? And if so, who would decide and how would they do it? If we can say that you don't have to be an adult to drive, and that adults under 21 can't drink, then surely we could say that a 17 and 18 year old having sex isn't rape unless one them says it was - and many states do just that. As for Rittenhouse, fine, let the juvenile court deal with it, but if found guilty, should someone that you described as a CRIMINAL for the CRIME of MURDER automatically be released at 21 for an offense that you said carries a mandatory life sentence?
-
I think he's talking about the San Francisco Bay's delta/watershed. Apparently it supplies water for drinking and irrigation while the rest of it is used to sustain wildlife in the area. According to this article, the water released into the sea has shown no measurable benefit to the ecosystem including the smelt and salmon populations which they hoped for, therefore it's now seen as a waste. I'm not sure how the flow of this water is controlled, whether by dam or some other type of "valve," or if it's just allowed to flow by naturally.
-
I suggest that Rittenhouse's behavior demonstrates a complete absence of adult judgment. Making legal boundaries fuzzy IMO leads to all sorts of problems. Leaving it black and white might make it easier, but truth and justice are not easily found, and often shaded gray.
-
One's actions speak more to the level of adulthood than the simple stroke of midnight. There are varying definitions of adulthood around the world - even the states have different ages of majority, typically 18-21. The definition of an adult is someone that is fully grown or developed. According to science, that would be closer to 25 - but if policy isn't best served by science and we just pick some arbitrary age anyway, then it makes sense to include a "buffer zone," say ± 2-3 years.
-
That's not really what we're talking about, but since you brought it up, do you think rittenhouse shouldn't be charged as an adult?
-
We're talking about statutory rape That's just because you're looking for reasons to be offended rather than paying attention to the conversation. I wasn't even the one that initially phrased it as being a "decision." People can make all kinds of accusations. That still doesn’t determine if an actual rape took place. All that's needed are their ages.
-
No My bad, I shouldn't have phrased that in the form of a question.
-
So the red is republicans, and the blue is democrats?
-
That wouldn’t be rape. That's the problem, that they could still be charged with it. And it wouldn't matter if she was being vindictive or not. A 17 year old preacher's daughter could think she's in a happy relationship with an 18 year old black kid, but there's nothing there to stop her father from filing charges against a black man for taking advantage of his underage daughter and raping her. Black man is convicted, subsequently imprisoned, riots ensue - but at least he won't have to register as a sex offender!
-
What is fucked up is you thinking the crime of rape is based on the victim's decision. If a 14 year old believes she had consensual sex, we'd still argue that she lacked the capacity to realize she was being manipulated by a 24 year old. I just don't think that argument should be used it cases between a 17 and 18 year old. Having a range like other states would address that issue.
-
That's pretty fucked up. Exactly, that's what I'm saying.
-
Deciding it was rape? wtf Exactly, that's what I'm saying.