-
Content
34,092 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2 -
Feedback
0%
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Dropzones
Gear
Articles
Fatalities
Stolen
Indoor
Help
Downloads
Gallery
Blogs
Store
Videos
Classifieds
Everything posted by rushmc
-
If it seems that way to you it's because that's what you want to read. 'Cos dude, that ain't what's being written. According to jakee!! yehaw "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln
-
For a minute there I was about to celebrate your road to Damascus moment, but then I saw the "acording [sic] to you". Well it seems (when one reads posts here) that many think all Christians are worse than one lslamo radical Just sayin "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln
-
Hitler was not a Christian "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln
-
Acording to you It is how a FEW humans use religion "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln
-
Oh ok we will change history to make you happy. cause the Nazis were what!? Jewish? Muslim? No Christian. I love how you said don't go there like yea we will just change the facts of history for your benefit. Hitler hated Christians So no history changed needed Unless you believe he was christian "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln
-
Puhleeze Oh sorry I forgot liberals have two differing sets of rules "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln
-
Jesus People??? Bigotry on display Again "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln
-
"Gun free zones" should be just that, not just on the honor system. If one does not want passive security (allowing those that choose to carry), they must provide active security in the form of armed guards and searches before entering. Not so quick http://freebeacon.com/national-security/72-dhs-employees-on-terrorist-watch-list/ TSA.......LMFAO! How often do you hear about guns getting inside airports? How many mass shootings inside an airport? Much of what they do is security theater, but they are at least searching all who enter. "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln
-
Ok I am coming back down to your level for a minute Some colleges are getting it The Liberty University president is tell his students to arm up I first saw this on AP but I know many here like FOX better http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/12/06/liberty-university-president-encourages-students-to-carry-gun-on-campus/?intcmp=hpbt2 Excuse me now, I am going to climb back up. "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln
-
Fascinating, coming from the guy who just this week criticized Billvon for a single letter typo. Hi John I see you do not understand sarcasm And a question mark is criticizing? "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln
-
Anothere example of the liberal going off berating anyone who does not agree with them Any, statists and reports show your assurtions to be bullshit So I came down to your level. I am headed back up now "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln
-
But by who?? I can see arguments supporting blaming either side He just assumed it was gun supporter Maybe, but that makes less sense than the other side not wanting these approved weapon available I do not know No one does "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln
-
Well, there are a few stories like this. What other viable thesis do you have for them not to be in the market?you tell me. You are one saying that they are being stopped from being sold or developed somehow You also still haven't answered what my agenda is. More gun controls? Unlike you I do not think I can read minds You also haven't answered why I would want to find more smart guns for sale for you. You made it sound like these guns were available and retailers are being threatened so they will not sell them. Well, as best I can tell is there are very few that would work for personal protection so they are really not an issue to begin with "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln
-
My point is that they aren't around. Why would I want to find more smart guns for sale for you? ***But, even you have to admit the whole smart gun theme leaves us with more questions than answers Not really. I think they could be a great option for some people. It is unfortunate it is actively discouraged. Problem you have is your last sentence can not be proven. It is your opinion only. "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln
-
You think it is made up? Planted by the lieberal lamestream media? Smells of what? Made up? I don't know I have no way of knowing But, even you have to admit the whole smart gun theme leaves us with more questions than answers Why would the gun store owner get threatened ? Does not make sense Who would make suck a threat if indeed it was really done? If he was going to sell smart guns, (and this story is from almost 18 months ago) where are these smart guns? Why can then not be found for sale? Why is the Forbes link useless? Show me more smart guns for sale than the one I found. Or, are you just buying into this because it helps you with your agenda? "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln
-
You are behind I already posted to you I found the story with a bunch of other info but I just got the following The one gun I found was chambered in 22 LR and cost $1800.00 The whole story you posted smells "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln
-
Ok I went and did a search and found your story A couple of things here First The story is from May of 2014 From the story and from listening to you, one would think smart guns are available so I did a search looking for these guns that are for sale Now, maybe I do not know how to search but I could not find any Second I did find the following from Forbes April 22, 2015 http://fortune.com/2015/04/22/smart-guns-theyre-ready-are-we/ From Forbes Cool So I can go see a smart gun at smartgunz.com Nope? The domain not functional Seems to be a bunch of fishy stuff here with all of this so I ask again Who made the threats? And why? If I am missing something, please share it with me Edited to add Ok I found this http://www.armatix.com/Smart-System.778.0.html?&L=7 "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln
-
Why not? The safer table saw is significantly more expensive, yet there is a market for it. Why should that preemptively be stopped for guns? I could imagine that as a parent with young kids in the house, you may want to spend more money on a gun that can only be fired by 1 specific person. You buy it for them then. Money does not seem to be an issue for you I would buy it for my family if it was available. But it simply isn't available in the US. Actually the product is actively being prevented from being sold. Which I believe you are in support of. So, why are you in support of not allowing a safer version of one inanimate object, but allowing it for another inanimate object? All I am against is government requiring something like a smart gun And I await your link showing where a safer gun is being prevented from being made (I really look forward to this) I have previously supplied the link regarding the gun store which was forced to remove the smart gun after receiving multiple death threats. We have had this discussion before. So not sure why you would really look forward to seeing it again, other than maybe enjoying the taste of leather? Who made the threats? And why? Sorry I forget you think you can read minds Never mind...... "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln
-
You have insinuated that. . Please Show us those posts "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln
-
I don't think he wants to take all your guns. There is no doubt he would like to see stricter controls. And where does stricter end? "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln
-
Why not? The safer table saw is significantly more expensive, yet there is a market for it. Why should that preemptively be stopped for guns? I could imagine that as a parent with young kids in the house, you may want to spend more money on a gun that can only be fired by 1 specific person. You buy it for them then. Money does not seem to be an issue for you I would buy it for my family if it was available. But it simply isn't available in the US. Actually the product is actively being prevented from being sold. Which I believe you are in support of. So, why are you in support of not allowing a safer version of one inanimate object, but allowing it for another inanimate object? All I am against is government requiring something like a smart gun And I await your link showing where a safer gun is being prevented from being made (I really look forward to this) "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln
-
So therefor it shouldn't be marketed or produced at all? Who the hell even insinuated that??? No Make them If they work and make sense, people will buy them But that is not what the issue is now is it? The issue is using the gov to force this on people "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln
-
Which generally makes the weapons significantly harder to acquire and/or not as effective. Both a deterrent in the long run. I know of a couple of groups for sure here in the US that would love to see it harder for the people to have weapons to protect themselves ISSIS is one that comes to mind. Clearly that is why ISIS planted Obama. Clearly? You have some interesting theory today But it is nice to you agree Obama wants to take our guns "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln
-
Why not? The safer table saw is significantly more expensive, yet there is a market for it. Why should that preemptively be stopped for guns? I could imagine that as a parent with young kids in the house, you may want to spend more money on a gun that can only be fired by 1 specific person. You buy it for them then. Money does not seem to be an issue for you "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln
-
Which generally makes the weapons significantly harder to acquire and/or not as effective. Both a deterrent in the long run. I know of a couple of groups for sure here in the US that would love to see it harder for the people to have weapons to protect themselves ISSIS is one that comes to mind. "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln