DSE

Members
  • Content

    12,933
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by DSE

  1. thanks for your input, Bob. I was stunned when your name was specifically mentioned as being "110% against any wingsuit rating or instructional program." So far we've had some really great input on the syllabus; looking forward to yours. It would be great if the USPA had an "Advanced Coach" rating (for all disciplines), as that's how I see a WSI rating.
  2. Didn't we sorta have this discussion just before/at Sebastian? If getting to a goal is all that matters, yes..."basic skydiving skills" have become an obstacle. There will be "that guy" that will go do a number of hop n' pops just to get to 200 so he can wingsuit or wear a camera. I had a goal of hitting 500 jumps in my first year by my birthday, so I ended up doing 42 H n' P's to make that goal. It used to be that jump numbers were an indication of basic skill/experience. Today, it means nothing. You have tunnel rats with 50 skydives that are amazing in the air and terrible under canopy, and you have people with 1000 skydives that can't form a 4 way round. People lie about jump numbers anyway.
  3. Really??? Data please. Prove your point. I've owned a Mirage and currently own two Voodoo. I'd certainly like to see data supporting that the Voodoo doesn't have equal or superior quality to the Vector 3, etc.
  4. in terms of fashion, that matches the Franken-wing wonderfully.
  5. DSE

    Camera Considerations 101

    Flying with a camera can be a lot of fun, and is a reasonably easy goal for new skydivers to achieve. The USPA SIM Section 6.8E recommends that a skydiver have 200 skydives before putting on a camera. The first question often asked is “Why 200 jumps?” I believe the answer to that question is that in times past, the D license (which at one time required only 200 jumps) meant that a skydiver had experienced enough of the basics of skydiving that he/she could begin exploring additional responsibilities during a skydive. By no means is anyone with only 200 jumps generally prepared to be a good nor safe camera flyer, but everyone needs a benchmark from which to begin. This article isn’t about debating the merits of jump numbers; I’d recommend potential camera flyers stick with the SIM and the findings of the USPA. Before beginning, you’ll need to make a couple of gear decisions straight off, and this article is to help you prepare for those decisions. HEADGEARChoosing a helmet is the first and potentially most important decision in flying a camera. There are a lot of good helmets out there; each manufacturer has their own ideas about why their helmets may be better than another helmet. What your first decision will be isn’t as much about a brand, but rather a type. P>There are two types of helmets; those that are primarily side mount, and those that are primarily top mount. Most side mount helmets do offer at least a small top area to which a second camera or other fixture may be mounted. Most of the top-mount helmets are designed to place everything on the top of the helmet. Each type of helmet has its own advantages and disadvantages. Freeflyers and inside RW/FS skydivers tend to prefer side mount camera helmets not only because of the profile of the helmet, but due to the way the air moves around the helmet. Those that are shooting four/eight-way FS might prefer a top mount not only due to the greater stability of a flat-top profile, but that the larger top area allows for two cameras to be mounted (one acts as a backup in case a camera fails in competition). Commercial photographers tend to prefer flat top systems so that they can mount larger cameras, or have enough space to mount a DSLR and video camera from the same perspective point. One point to consider aside from the primary flying format; top mount helmets with properly centered weight are less injurious to the neck over repetitive openings. VIDEO CAMERAVideo camera models change pretty quickly, so it’s pointless to recommend models vs features. While recommending a brand is tempting to avoid, Sony camcorders have a strong position in the skydiving market for several reasons. -External control. This is very important, as you’ll want to know whether the camera is on, recording, battery failing, or nearly out of media. There are a couple brands of control devices that provide this information. -Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS). This is fairly important for freeflying, and much less of an issue for tandem shooters. Avoid Optical Image Stabilization in most cases. The floating lenses of an OIS system makes it difficult to shoot a stable image under any but the most optimal shooting situations (very difficult to achieve). Small is in; cameras don’t need to be large to produce large results. Keep weight on your head to a minimum and your neck will thank you over hundreds or thousands of openings. If your intent is to wear a camera merely to document skydives with friends, low-cost camcorders such as the GoPro Hero and similar small cameras are wonderful. If your eventual goal is to work towards shooting tandems or teams, you’ll want to consider a higher quality camera. A current favorite is the Sony CX series of camcorders. LENSESMost camcorders do not offer lens widths sufficient for most inside or tandem-oriented skydiving. Wide angle lens adapters are commonly found on camcorders used for skydiving. For most skydiving use, a .5 or double field of view lens is sufficient. If you’re flying inside video for FS or Freeflying, a .3 or more than double wide field of view is generally desired. Anything more wide than a .3 is typically going to be relegated to handcam or specialized use. Depending on the size of the camera’s lens thread, a step-up or step-down ring might be necessary. Step-down rings almost always assure a vignetted shot (black circle around your video frame), whereas step-up rings rarely cause a vignette. Step-up and step-down rings are very inexpensive. Some are plastic, others are aluminum. Some professionals prefer plastic rings so that if a riser strike or line catches on a lens and tears it off, the plastic ring will give way before damaging the camera. While this is likely true, plastic rings also deteriorate in strength when exposed to sunlight. If you use a plastic step ring, be sure to periodically inspect it to be sure it’s not become brittle or cracked due to sun exposure. RINGSIGHTSAlthough it’s tempting to want to outfit a helmet with everything right from the start, it’s a good idea to add parts one step at a time. A ringsight is a good tool for some disciplines; it helps the videographer know where the camera lens is looking, and some types of ringsights help with framing and distance. Ringsights aren’t necessary for inside shooting of FS or Freeflying. No matter what, a ringsight is a snag hazard regardless of how much care is taken to prevent it from being so. The risk can be lessened, but not entirely removed. The ringsite should be one of the last accessories added to a camera helmet. In lieu of a ringsight, consider a “paper asshole” or a punch hole reinforcement sticker, mounted on your goggles. This can serve the same purpose and yet completely remove the snag hazard of a ringsight. A circle or dot can be drawn on goggles as well. To sight in a dot on a goggle; face a plain wall on which, you’ve taped a target. A paper plate works well for this exercise. Stand back from the wall at a distance of about ten feet. Put on the camera helmet, turn on the camera, and have a friend hold your head/helmet so the paper plate is dead center in the camera’s display. Keep your eye looking forward; don’t be tempted to roll the eyeball up/down/sideways. Keep it straightforward. It might take a moment to get comfortable holding your eye straightforward while a friend guides your head/helmet to the centerpoint/target. Once you’ve relaxed, focused on the target, and the target is in the center of the camera, mark your goggles (one side only, usually the right side) with a DRY ERASE marker. Remove the helmet, remove the goggles/glasses, and then put them back on and check to see that a reasonably accurate target acquisition occurs. Otherwise, repeat the aiming/targeting process. It’s worth mentioning once again however, a ringsite should be one of the last accessories added to a camera helmet when you’re a newcomer to camera flying. A ringsight adds an unnecessary snag hazard. STILL CAMERAAgain, it’s very tempting to buy a camera helmet with everything in one shot, and as mentioned previously, is a poor decision for newcomers to camera flying. Learning to fly with a video camera will help develop the skills necessary for flying a still camera. DSLR cameras are popular, as they record stills to a memory card, making for fast previewing of photos taken during a skydive, and for tandems, DSLR’s are necessary for fast delivery of photos to tandem students. Though Canon and Nikon are both popular brands of cameras for skydiving, most any kind of camera can be modified to accept a bite, tongue, blow, or hand switch for taking skydiving photographs. MOUNTING DEVICESThe device used for mounting a still or video camera to the camera helmet is critical, particularly for video cameras. If the mounting device isn’t rock-solid, the camera will shake or shudder in freefall, resulting in an unstable image. Sometimes this shudder/shake will be blamed on the video camera when the blame lies squarely on the camera mount. Check whatever mounting device you’re considering to be sure it will not move either at the time of purchase, or after it’s been in use for a period of time. Personally, I’m a big fan of the Cookie Composites Padlock systems and the Really Right Stuff mounting systems. Neither are inexpensive, but if you want solid video and clean stills, a solid mounting system is critical. CONTROLLING SYSTEMSCamcorders and still cameras need hands-free operation. Video cameras can be manually started/stopped in the aircraft, but for convenience and comfort, most camera flyers use a control system of some sort. Sony tapeless systems offer essentially one controller choice; the HyPeye products from GetHypoxic. All of the camera control systems also offer an indicator that indicates the status of the camcorder such as Power On/Off, Standby, and Record modes. In lieu of these indicator devices, you can always wear a small mirror on the wrist next to the altimeter, and view the Record light on the camcorder. I’d recommend a plastic mirror vs a glass mirror in case your wrist strikes the side of the aircraft. Still cameras/DSLRs require some sort of trigger device to cause the camera to snap a shot. Conceptus manufactures tongue and bite switches for Canon cameras. Custom Nikon switches are available from The Ranch Pro Shop and other resellers. Some Pentax cameras use the Canon connection (2.5mm plug). It’s difficult to recommend a bite switch, hand switch, tongue switch, or blow switch; everyone has a preference. I personally prefer a tongue switch, but many friends like bite switches. Some like hand switches. You can also “roll your own” from inexpensive parts available at Radio Shack. JUMP SUIT/CLOTHINGSome camera flyers opt for jumping with or without a camera suit, or a suit with “wings.” Although it’s a personal preference, camera wings provide the camera flyer a more stable flying platform (when used correctly) provide the for a great deal of range and control that isn’t quite so easy to achieve when wearing a standard jumpsuit or freefly suit. If you’re looking at flying with tandems, wings are often an important part of the jump. If you’re shooting freefly work, you probably won’t want to wear wings. There is a lot to learn about flying a camera. Getting good at RW is perhaps the best thing you can do to prep for flying a camera with tandems and four/eight way teams. Understanding burbles, trapdoors, safe zones, and having good belly skills that include side sliding, the ability to orbit, and a very broad fallrate are all important aspects of camera flying. This article does not discuss the challenges of camera flying and make no mistake; there are many dangers. One such danger, is that the camera flyer is always focused on the action in front, and never able to turn to see what’s happening behind him/her. Another danger is that in order to “get the shot” some camera flyers lose altitude awareness and may find themselves well below appropriate deployment altitudes. Spend time talking to the camera flyers on your dropzone, reading the forums, and pay attention to some of the videos you’ll find on Skydivingmovies.com, YouTube, and Vimeo. All have examples of good and bad camera flying. You can learn a lot just from watching the techniques of others.
  6. Changing frame rate won't affect rolling shutter. Changing shutter speed will, and the Contour doesn't allow for manually controlling shutter speeds. *All* CMOS sensors will have rolling shutter at various speeds, but most don't have issues til around 1/250 or faster. I suspect what you're seeing are either stabilizer issues or conversions from the interlaced sensor being processed to progressive. I haven't seen one up close and personal, but have seen footage.
  7. I can tell you that Sony execs are not allowed to fly on the same plane. Same thing with Microsoft. But those are execs, not average "employees."
  8. Jimmy, it's about character. Not only are you a character, you've got lots of it.
  9. I didn't realize he was hurt that badly. He's an amazing kid, lots of skill and "go get em'" attitude. Hope he's OK soon!
  10. As I go in for my ACL/MCL surgery tomorrow morning, I look at the laundry list of broken bones (now up to 58 in my lifetime) garnered from a lot of sports activities ranging from skydiving to rodeo.... Accidents teach us lessons. Using an audible isn't the lesson you should have learned from your accident. Another lesson to learn is that we don't want to repeat what we did. If you know what you did, GREAT! Don't repeat it. Of course your confidence is shaken. You screwed up. So did I. Some people say "That'll never happen to me." And then it does. I never planned on dropping a toggle. One guy on my DZ called me an idiot for dropping a toggle. Only idiots drop toggles. Many who do don't get a second chance. Skydiving sometimes doesn't give second chances. What if you f**k up again? Guaranteed, you will. Hopefully the damage will be less severe. I nearly died; I'm working hard to get back up in the air. And know that on that first jump back, I'm at greater risk than I was as an AFF Cat A student, because my confidence is shaken. I think that's a normal response. How am I dealing with it? As though I'm an AFF student, and I'm my own instructor. I'm upsizing back to a 190 and not jumping my smaller canopies for a while. No riser turns for a while. Nothing aggressive for a while. Being hyper aware. And I hope I don't become complacent (again) because I believe a dropped toggle may have resulted from complacency ("I've landed a thousand times this way before, right?") I f**ked up. Badly. And am very lucky to have lived through it. Perforated colons and open-booked pelvis' make for a bad day. If you want a guarantee that you won't be paralyzed or dead...quit jumping. The ONLY way to guarantee that you won't be hurt badly in a skydiving accident is to not skydive. My accident nearly killed me. I'm going back up. I'm using caution, but my passion for flying outweighs my fear of injury. YMMV. If you're interested in some of what went through my head during my experience, I wrote about it here.
  11. Based on a couple PM's, I'm wondering if you're talking about the King Air (not Otter) at Skydive Utah. Per the DZO's email: "As most of you know by now, the left engine on 32229 went down Saturday. Doug did a fantastic job as did all jumpers on board. It has been a 1/4 century since I have been involved with a voluntary emergency exit, but this is why we train for one on an ongoing basis. As a sideline, even the whuffos on board were impressed with how the situation was handled, not even knowing what the protocols were. At this point the engine apears to be non-repairable. I am writing this e-letter to let you know we are not dead in the water." I was not there, all information third-hand, may be entirely or partially incorrect. Two tandems, two videographers, two AFFI's, two AFF students on the load. Everyone landed off except the two AFF students who landed with the aircraft. One Facebook posting says they landed 5 miles off the airport which is about what I was told in an email. Did the pilot instruct the AFF students to stay in the plane? Knowing him, I doubt it. He likely isn't trained in what to do in that situation, but he's a very experienced pilot. Did the AFFI's tell them to stay? I don't know. Wasn't there. My AFF training taught me that at least one instructor stays with student if they *cannot* get out, but same training says that if we're able and pilot prefers, we're all going out, and I'm going to deploy my student as soon as we clear the plane. The AFFI/E I had in Eloy is the same AFFI/E that trained the two AFFI's that were on board when the engine blew so I'm reasonably confident their training was the same that I received. Again, I wasn't there, most of what I know comes from third hand information and from some Facebook postings. Irrespective of this situation, were it my student and the aircraft was flying under control and stable (as I was told it was, and as the email implies), I'd have taken the student out and deployed him/her unless instructed otherwise by the PIC. This is how I was trained, and common sense says that a student shouldn't be left alone with just the pilot, as once the instructor is out of the aircraft, the student(s) could potentially freak out on the pilot, distract or challenge his ability to control the aircraft. Again...all that said...I was not there, and don't know the facts, so outside of what's on Facebook and the email from the DZO, I'm coming from thirdhand information. It's entirely possible one of the AFF instructors *did* stay in the plane and the person who emailed me about the incident was not correct. It's a helluva'n interesting discussion though.
  12. Still current, but it's the consumer cycle. They're building fewer and fewer due to economy. They build to market forecast and then start tooling for next big thing.... Like the HC1, it has sold faster than expected.
  13. Those who know, can't say. Those who say, don't know. Look really hard, I'm sure you'll find some information out there. (Hint), search Japanese sites.
  14. DSE

    Rain!

    Phree's advice is pretty common for broadcast lenses that leak. Although I've tossed adapters in an oven set to low heat, sunlight is probably smarter. Hope there was no chemical component in the rain that leaves a spot.
  15. You could achieve NTSC quality with MPEG 4 at approx 750Kpbs. If the encoder crushed the blacks and limited the top end, you could do it around 600k. I've seen some LOS short-distance non-licensed systems that offer greater bitrates but I'm sure that's not what you were using. RSM has an MPEG 4 system that is 20 watts(?) for a coupla grand, but it wasn't impressive at NAB (my only real experience with it). 20 watts should give you 10 miles + of stable vid assuming there isn't a lot of other RF in the area, but you'd know a lot more about radio than I would.
  16. personally, I'd recommend you _don't_ install it. What editing program are you planning on using?
  17. yes they are, and congrats to you for completing the course successfully!! Very cool.
  18. Web quality (say....512Kpbs) wouldn't be hard at all. Laszlo started down the right path with a converter, but I'd go to MP4. I dont' have one to play with anymore, but I *believe* the Sony Webbie can export live MP4 via the USB port at user-selectable bitrates.
  19. DSE

    Nice F16 photo

    If it's long lens compression, it's heavily photoshopped, because the light angles are too consistent, and the long lens would have to be a VERY fast lens ie; 1.8 1.8 lens at that focal length would not only be huge in size, but would be difficult to carry in battlefield situations. That said, I know the combat camera unit from Coronado has one, but I don't know if it deploys or not. Either it's a heavily photoshopped pic, or a pic shot wth a very fast, reasonably stable lens (another argument that it's probably not a long lens) But damn...I'd like to play with the RAW of that shot to really make it scream. Nice frame.
  20. you and the better half would have been icing on the cake. We did gossip about your LP experience though.... Looking forward to seeing you guys here soon.
  21. Quade's post summed it up pretty well 3 years ago. And it hasn't changed much. In fact, the viable bandwidth for such work changed recently, and it's more narrow now than it was then. DTV has shifted the world, and HD wants more bandwidth. 2.5 miles, even LOS... is still a lot to ask for at full rez or even reasonable quality.
  22. Thank you muchly. It was a "normal" day in every sense of the word and I was all settled in to watch a couple videos with my cat and dog when some friends came over and asked me to come into my living room. Surprise! most of my local skydiving friends and a few of my film-work friends were there, plus folks from an old motorcycle group I used to ride a lot with. Definitely an interesting mix and a lot of people met new people. Lots of beer, pizza, KFC, all that fun, bad-for-you food, and my first night in a couple of months where I wasn't bombed on pain meds by 9:30 and asleep by 10.00.... Turned out to be a great night. thanks for the well-wishes.