DanG

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content

    6,580

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by DanG

  1. DanG
    And our definition of victory should be that the American way of life still exists. If we continue to self-erode our freedoms, then they've won by our standards, too. - Dan G
  2. DanG
    Oh, they're out to get YOU. They're not out to get skyrider. - Dan G
  3. DanG
    No it doesn't. A true victory for the terrorists is if we lose our freedoms because of the attack. I visited Ground Zero for the first time a couple weeks ago. We pretty much walked around the entire site. I never saw the building in question, it is not adjacent to Ground Zero. There is, however, a church directly across the street. - Dan G
  4. DanG
    I agree that the US is retardedly sue happy, but in this case it may actually be the insurance company suing on their behalf. - Dan G
  5. DanG
    You quoted from the dictionary a bunch of definitions of "liberal". Which one were you applying to the noun "lawyer" in the OP? - Dan G
  6. DanG
    Gosh, you're waiting for little old me? I'm flattered. - Dan G
  7. DanG
    You forgot, "And then turtle jumps in and cheerleads for his buddy, also providing no original thought." BTW, he didn't answer my question. I asked what "liberal" meant besides a political philosophy to him. He quoted the dictionary. There was no original content. - Dan G
  8. DanG
    The OP included a derogatory statement about liberal lawyers. When called on it, you said that liberal means more than a political philosophy. I asked what you meant. If you saw my question as an attack, that's your bag. Not everyone is out to get you. BTW, I think the guy (and his lawyer, who is himself) is a total douchebag. - Dan G
  9. DanG
    Not denying anything. I wanted people to understand the number they are throwing around. ABC at least references the actual CBO report (http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/114xx/doc11490/LewisLtr_HR3590.pdf). The operative statement in the ABC report is, "CBO had originally estimated that the health care reform bill would result in a net reduction in federal deficits of $143 billion from 2010-2019; this revised number would eliminate most of that savings." Now try to follow along, the original estimate was that the bill would save $143B. The new estimate is that is will only save $28B. Saying that the bill will cost $1trillion may be true, but I notice that no one quoting that figure makes the statement that the cost under the old system was also about $1trillion. People throwing around the $1trillion number are trying to plant the idea that the bill costs $1trillion more. That is nowhere near the truth. - Dan G
  10. DanG
    Very impressive, you can Google. As usual, no content. - Dan G
  11. DanG
    I don't find it offensive. I quoted you and asked a question. If you can't answer it, just say so. To me, "liberal" represents a political ideology. You said that it represents more than that, and I want to know what you mean. - Dan G
  12. DanG
    Maybe you shouldn't own a dog. - Dan G
  13. DanG
    This is enlightening. What does the word liberal represent to you? - Dan G
  14. DanG
    Okay, I looked at the first four links. Weekly Standard: Blog post written before the final CBO estimate was released. Heritage: "CBO: Obamacare Unlikely to Reduce Spending on Health Care" Headline based on alternative fiscal scenario, which assumes that the parts of the healthcare bill will be repealed or amended. Hotair: Blog post where the first line is, "Of all the slime dripping from ObamaCare, from the de facto bribes to the procedural shenanigans to the Democrats’ insane demagoguery of townhall protesters, the gaming of the CBO numbers is what bothers me most." No link or reference to CBO report. Pajamasmedia: Blog post all over the map, mostly about denying care to patients. No link to CBO numbers. Here's the link to the actual CBO report: http://www.cbo.gov/publications/collections/health.cfm Care to try again? - Dan G
  15. DanG
    This one: -143 != +1000 - Dan G
  16. DanG
    What is this $1 trillion in cost you people are throwing around as a fact? - Dan G
  17. DanG
    So have peaceful Muslims. - Dan G
  18. DanG
    Not sure that a missle was launched is a fact. That article was ridiculous. - Dan G
  19. DanG
    Any commentary? What do you think of this report? - Dan G
  20. DanG
    You forgot: for the children. - Dan G
  21. DanG
    I'm implying that you are making your living off the people you despise, the very same people who you believe want to destroy your country. If I'm wrong, I apologize. - Dan G
  22. DanG
    As long as it's for the children... - Dan G
  23. DanG
    I doubt you could. Maybe raghead, or camel jockey would help. I also don't understand how you can reconcile working with the enemy. If you feel so strongly, why not join our team and come on over to the winning side? - Dan G
  24. DanG
    As an obviously educated and world traveled man, whuy do you insist on using the term Hadjii in such a way? Do you believe that all suicide bombers have made the pilgrimidge to Mecca? - Dan G
  25. DanG
    Sure about that? All House seats were up for election. Pelosi won her election with 80% of the vote. I don't like her, but her constituents clearly do. - Dan G