DanG

Members
  • Content

    6,580
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by DanG

  1. Ask Roger next time you see him at the DZ. Short answer: depends, but it could. - Dan G
  2. You think so? That's weird, most people think they're pretty right wing. Are you replying to something specific in my post? I never said anything about Fox News other than to identify the reporter. I didn't feel like going back to the link to get their name. - Dan G
  3. I guess I should have been more clear: The only person related to this article using the term Indian American is the Fox News reporter. Better? - Dan G
  4. Nowhere in the article was the term Indian-American used. It's the Hindus that are upset. Hinduism just happens to be the predominant religion of India. You can be full blooded American and Hindu, just like you can be full blooded American and Christian. And how else is an organization of Hindu Americans supposed to identify themselves? Association of Americans Who Practice the Hindu Religion? You find this less offensive that Hindu American Association? - Dan G
  5. That was the Libyans, Marty. - Dan G
  6. No, what's really scary is that they've developed a missile that burn for ten minutes, fly subsonically, and still fit on a sub. - Dan G
  7. Just turn around and face the other way. - Dan G
  8. If you believe the CBO, the healthcare bill will reduce federal spending, not increase it. - Dan G
  9. So then when will we be suffficiently safe? Where is the line? I submit that we will never be 100% safe, so the idea that we have to do everything possible to improve safety just ends up being blanket permission for the government to expand their powers and erode our freedom. - Dan G
  10. First of all, I think we're already pretty safe flying. You can't 100% ensure that no bomb, gun, or knife is ever going to get through. The flying public needs to accept that. Recruiting quality screeners and training them well will go a long way. Psychological profiling, a no-fly/watch list that is not a dumping ground for every name in the phone book, and better coordination between the screening agency and the airlines. The goal should be to stop the terrorists before they even get to the screening area. - Dan G
  11. Yeah, it sucked. It was Mohammed, #29. Technically, I don't consider him a terrorist, he was an insurgent. His attack was an act of combat, not terrorism, but since all Muslims are terrorists ([sarc]), and this one had a bomb, it's close enough. I guess my larger point is that not everyone who is against security theater is a pansy liberal. Some of us just happen to love the Constitution. - Dan G
  12. That's exactly what I meant. I'm anti-security theater, and I've been blown up by a terrorist. - Dan G
  13. It is pretty obvious that your bias clouds your understanding of the context of the posts. It obviously clouds your responses. Right back atcha. - Dan G
  14. Stop wondering, been there, done that. I think airport security is a joke and slap in the face to the Constitution. - Dan G
  15. Here's the sum total of your contribution to the thread: Where did you try to show me something? Note: I do not expect a substantive response, so feel free to one-liner it as usual. - Dan G
  16. Oh, sorry. Liberal = things that skyrider and turtlespeed don't like - Dan G
  17. You have a really skewed view of how we got where we are. The Bush Administration put together the Patriot Act, Homeland Security, and the TSA. Were they "Liberals"? - Dan G
  18. Ahh, I get it now. Liberal = things skyrider doesn't like. Thanks. - Dan G
  19. I'm pretty sure it's not the "liberals" who are fear mongering about Muslims. - Dan G
  20. You just assumed that my question was an attack andraised up your hackles in defense. If anyone is behaving childishly, it is you. Man up and answer the questions. - Dan G
  21. It's not the Muslims who are taking away our freedoms. We're doing to ourselves. I have seen the enemy, and he is us. - Dan G
  22. Nice one liner. Again. If you actually had any point to make, you could have taken this opportunity to clarify your remarks. I can only assume that you are just pot stirring, cheerleading, or are such a post whore you can't help replying to every thread. - Dan G
  23. Let's review: JohnRich: We've failed so miserably to protect our own border that we've now allowed the illegals to become the legal majority. billvon: Uh, no, we haven't. JohnRich: Whites no longer the majority in California, Hispanics taking population lead , List of U.S. communities with Hispanic majority populations To anyone without reading comprehension problems, JohnRich said that all non-whites, whether currently legal or not, started out as illegal aliens. - Dan G
  24. Huh? I don't get your meaning. - Dan G
  25. "The readers" don't see what you see. You clearly equated illegals with non-whites. If you can't see that, don't worry: everyone else can. - Dan G