SkyDekker

Members
  • Content

    21,691
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    96
  • Feedback

    0%
  • Country

    Canada

Everything posted by SkyDekker

  1. It is a confession of sorts really. If some of the records are part of Executive Privilege, that would automatically make them Presidential Records, which are to be delivered to NARA and not MAL.
  2. Not so quick..... https://coolhunting.com/food-drink/banana-trees-could-protect-california-cities-from-wildfires/
  3. I'd say let bygones be bygones and start a brand new Future of the USA thread as you suggested...
  4. Started that thread a long time ago, titled along the line of The US is a Banana Republic. People got very upset. edited to add: it wasn’t in Bonfire though.
  5. Would really have been much more impactful if you had cut it off at the first “don’t think.”
  6. Why are you not adding Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell to this list as well? (Don't think Hillary took any secrets home, the concern was around her email setup. But then I don't think facts really matter to you)
  7. Seems the latest excuse is that the documents the FBI planted were declassified automatically when Trump took them with him.
  8. So did trump family members. Some of whom were unable to pass tests for security clearances and Trump had to order them to be given to get past that.
  9. In 2019 there were whistleblowers who were worried about how nuclear technology was sent to Saudi Arabia. Since then Kushner has received $2 Billion from SA. And Trump has received $100s of millions for SA owned LIV golf tournaments at 2 of his properties. Then we find out that after being asked for a year, plus being subpoenaed to return Top Secret information which may include nuclear information, Trump decided to hang on to it. Doesn't seem overly odd to think Trump may have held on to that information to monetize it. The pictures could maybe show an offense under the PRA. The Mar-a-Lago documents would relate to the Espionage Act.
  10. The standard of proof is my own opinion, which is why the first time I brought this up I started the sentence with IMHO. I thought you Brits understood how to read?
  11. Logical reasoning would dictate a person is likely to act the same way they have acted throughout their life.
  12. One minor difference might be that the Secretary of State has a security clearance and a former president does not. Other than all the other difference that you clearly cannot see with those immense partisan blinders on. The FBI announcement to reopen the investigation 11 days prior to the election effectively sank her presidential bid. An announcement that was against FBI policy. This idea that the FBI, led by a Trump picked Republican, is this bastion of socialist progessive Lieberalism is even more stupid than the constant bleating of: Buttery Males.
  13. If you look at the bottom right of that clip you can see this is not from Fox News, but from CNN.
  14. Presidents don't keep a security clearance because they are never vetted for a security clearance. They get it by virtue of being elected. Past presidents may continue to get classified documents if the current president consents. Biden did not.
  15. Sorry, but that narrative isn't allowed here. He would never keep stuff to sell, because he simply never thinks about how to make money off things. Certainly doesn't have a history doing that all.
  16. Garland just called Trump's bluff. Will we get to see the warrant and manifest? We'll soon find out.
  17. Weird, I see the actual image, even in your reply:
  18. lol, ok buddy. I am literally the second post under the pictures. The pictures are a nothing burger, cause they don't prove anything. I will leave it at that. You can have the last word after this.
  19. That much vision? You can faithfully rely on Trump to do one thing and one thing consistently, monetize whatever he can get his hands on. Even the "FBI Raid" is already being used for fundraising purposes. Why do you think he was (other than a local reporter) the first one to announce it? And when it comes to Trump, I am not sure he understands words like spite and petulance, but he certainly understands money.
  20. Because you tied the validity of these pictures to the execution of a search warrant. You don't know that. There is nothing in those pictures that would conclusively prove they pertain to records covered under the PRA. (they also don't prove they were actually discarded by Trump) There is so much wrong with hose pictures, which is why they are being used to sell a book years later....and not when it actually supposedly all happened.
  21. They will not be brought up in any legal setting. There is no way to verify. Even people like Heather Cox Richardson are very skeptical about those pictures. Maybe in some closing argument, if it would ever get to that. Definitely not as any evidentiary production.
  22. Uhm yes, why I said I would have a hard time believing it. Until we see a copy of the search warrant we won't know. From what is public, it would appear it does relate to handling of classified documents. I highly doubt it was only based on him having them, they would not take this extraordinary step just for that. They must have had some pretty credible information about something that was done or was going to be done with those documents.
  23. Yes the FBI got the search warrant based on those pictures.......I don't have a very high opinions of the US Justice system, but even I would have a hard time believing that. The search warrant isn't for document she got rid of, it is for documents he kept. IMHO there is only one reason he would keep them, which is to monetize them.
  24. https://twitter.com/BrynnTannehill/status/1556981527090716673?s=20&t=y80jz0eKtRzNciUzycMLkw