-
Content
21,691 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
96 -
Feedback
0% -
Country
Canada
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Dropzones
Gear
Articles
Fatalities
Stolen
Indoor
Help
Downloads
Gallery
Blogs
Store
Videos
Classifieds
Everything posted by SkyDekker
-
That doesn't contradict what lippy wrote. You can do something legally and still get bankrupted or ruined in court.
-
Dominion Voting Systems v Fake Fox News Corp. aka Rupert Murdoch PAC
SkyDekker replied to Phil1111's topic in Speakers Corner
No, that isn't what I said. There is always the chance the jury would award and it would somehow stand at appeal. You don't know until you go through the process. -
Well, they are discussing whether or not they should repeal the current law that prohibits co-habitation. Turns out it was already illegal in Michigan. It is also illegal in Mississippi. https://abcnews.go.com/US/michigan-repeal-law-unmarried-living/story?id=39038780
-
I think these two statements are mutually exclusive. Why do people like strongman leaders? They like them, IMHO, because they represent what they themselves are too afraid to do. Same reason much of the GOP loves Trump. He says what they only are willing to say in small groups, but are to cowardly to say in public. The love for a strongman is driven by cowardice.
-
Considering in Michigan they are discussing making it illegal for unwed couples to live together.....
-
That doesn't answer the question. When she stops making you dinner and stops having sex with you, how long will you love her and how long until the divorce?
-
Dominion Voting Systems v Fake Fox News Corp. aka Rupert Murdoch PAC
SkyDekker replied to Phil1111's topic in Speakers Corner
An amount that is so large it is extremely likely it would have 1) not been awarded in the first place 2) would not have withstood appeal. -
Dominion Voting Systems v Fake Fox News Corp. aka Rupert Murdoch PAC
SkyDekker replied to Phil1111's topic in Speakers Corner
That was nowhere near enough. Only once the information they got through deposition came out did it become clear Dominion had a very strong case. Again, these cases are exceedingly hard to win and are almost without precedent I mean, they already did, they sued for about $1 BILLION more than they settled for. -
Dominion Voting Systems v Fake Fox News Corp. aka Rupert Murdoch PAC
SkyDekker replied to Phil1111's topic in Speakers Corner
No expert at all, just trying to use some common sense. These types of cases are exceedingly hard to win and Dominion was using high caliber law firms, why would a law firm agree to a full or part contingency contract? -
Dominion Voting Systems v Fake Fox News Corp. aka Rupert Murdoch PAC
SkyDekker replied to Phil1111's topic in Speakers Corner
Unfortunately this Special Master may have led to the settlement by Fox. This investigation dies with it. -
Dominion Voting Systems v Fake Fox News Corp. aka Rupert Murdoch PAC
SkyDekker replied to Phil1111's topic in Speakers Corner
And they have continued to rise in popularity in the subsequent 10 years, except your googling couldn't find any mention of them? Again, it is possible, but in this case I find it highly unlikely. -
When your self-admitted trophy wife stops having sex with you, how long till you divorce her?
-
Dominion Voting Systems v Fake Fox News Corp. aka Rupert Murdoch PAC
SkyDekker replied to Phil1111's topic in Speakers Corner
Sure, but civil law isn't about justice. -
Dominion Voting Systems v Fake Fox News Corp. aka Rupert Murdoch PAC
SkyDekker replied to Phil1111's topic in Speakers Corner
At this level, I doubt that too. -
Dominion Voting Systems v Fake Fox News Corp. aka Rupert Murdoch PAC
SkyDekker replied to Phil1111's topic in Speakers Corner
Any evidence they were on a contingency contract, cause I highly, highly, highly doubt that. -
Dominion Voting Systems v Fake Fox News Corp. aka Rupert Murdoch PAC
SkyDekker replied to Phil1111's topic in Speakers Corner
$787.5 million is a lot of cash. -
Dominion Voting Systems v Fake Fox News Corp. aka Rupert Murdoch PAC
SkyDekker replied to Phil1111's topic in Speakers Corner
The judge has installed a Special Master to investigate if FOX abided by the rules of discovery and whether it purposely held back materials. the Special Master can depose anybody he wants and all at FOX's dime. This also likely will not end well for FOX. -
Dominion Voting Systems v Fake Fox News Corp. aka Rupert Murdoch PAC
SkyDekker replied to Phil1111's topic in Speakers Corner
Since 1980 there is 1 county that got it all right. Then there is a list of counties with 1 deviation and a significantly larger list with 2 deviations. 2020 Had 18 counties with 1 deviation since 1980 and Slim Shady is calling it a mathematical impossibility. Makes me wonder how many countries with 1 deviation have to get it wrong for it to be a mathematical impossibility? Is it 4, is it 8, is it 10? -
Well, if God wanted these students to be able to defend themselves he wouldn't have made them disabled.
-
Dominion Voting Systems v Fake Fox News Corp. aka Rupert Murdoch PAC
SkyDekker replied to Phil1111's topic in Speakers Corner
Out of curiosity, how many bellwether counties have to get it wrong for an election to be a "mathematical impossibility?" -
All start as X, so if life begins at conception, all men are trans.
-
Dominion Voting Systems v Fake Fox News Corp. aka Rupert Murdoch PAC
SkyDekker replied to Phil1111's topic in Speakers Corner
Dominion knows the position they are in, highly doubt they would settle for "only" money. -
Dominion Voting Systems v Fake Fox News Corp. aka Rupert Murdoch PAC
SkyDekker replied to Phil1111's topic in Speakers Corner
And it is this fundraising that eventually might take him down for wirefraud. -
Indeed. How that isn't a slam dunk crime as reported is insane. How do people think this is even remotely normal?
-
Never mind the House Rules, it is against their State Constitution. But I think we all know by now that for Republicans they really only understand constitutions when it comes to guns, anything else really doesn't matter. Well, as long as uppity negros don't also have guns.