jcd11235

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content

    8,167

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by jcd11235

  1. jcd11235
    It's not a subjective discussion. Debate won't change the facts. Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!
  2. jcd11235
    I think you misunderstand the scientific method. Faith is not a requirement. Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!
  3. jcd11235
    No. Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!
  4. jcd11235
    I can't reproduce the problem. It's likely a rendering issue with your browser. What OS version, browser version and CSS (if any) are you using? Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!
  5. jcd11235
    She (nerdgirl) referenced the forty-third POTUS, not the forty-first POTUS. Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!
  6. jcd11235
    Your operating in faith here, which is progressing without evidence while at the same time saying you need evidence to have faith. As you gain evidence, your faith increases becoming more and more sure. This is no different than those who have faith in Gods love. God doesnt show us himself so that we can have faith, because it is faith that holds the power in the heart of Heaven. Without faith that you will find the answer you seek in cosmology, you wouldnt progress. No, my previous statement had no reliance on faith. If you think it does, then you clearly don't understand the definition of faith (which is further apparent in the rest of your post). Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!
  7. jcd11235
    What I wrote: Yeah, that budget surplus and growing economy that we saw during the Clinton administration had disaster written all over them. Then you made the claim about the federal budget being headed for disaster for decades. I said that was largely untrue, except fore Medicare, and, to a much lesser extent, Social Security. You said I was still wrong, yet you refuse to present any evidence of such, despite your multiple insults of the economic knowledge of others. So, if you are going to change the subject from the economy under Clinton to the federal economy of the past few decades, please present some facts, instead of insulting those of us who rely on them. Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!
  8. jcd11235
    If ever there is any credible evidence of a supernatural creator, I'll revisit the issue. However, thus far there is none, zero, nada, zip. Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!
  9. jcd11235
    By all means, share with us what was so unhealthy about budget surpluses, economic and median income growth, and low unemployment. Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!
  10. jcd11235
    And my point stands. We are not talking about anything remotely the same. You can believe in a supernatural being if you want to. For me, personally, I don't, since there is no credible evidence to support the existence of such a being. Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!
  11. jcd11235
    There are parts of the budget that have been headed towards crisis for decades, namely Medicare and Social Security, but largely it was healthy. Heck, Social Security should be fixed soon so that fixing it has the lowest annual cost possible, but it can pay out full benefits with no changes for many years to come. (Medicare is a very real, inevitable crisis that is very rapidly approaching without immediate attention.) I thought the same thing about your comment of Libertarian understanding economics. A hands off approach to the economy is not effective. An effective economic policy is inconsistent with the ideal Libertarian economic policy of the government keeping its hands off. Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!
  12. jcd11235
    Primary data in which the author(s) objectively reach the conclusion of a liberal bias with valid methodology. Think peer reviewed. Fair enough, although it's hardly relevant. The views represented in your posts still tend to be far-right. Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!
  13. jcd11235
    LOL, literally. If you only knew! I've never said anything favorable about Sen. Obama's economic policy. I've not examined it closely. I certainly am not naïve enough to base an opinion of someone's economic policy on a sound bite, however. I would much rather examine the numbers. Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!
  14. jcd11235
    Don't worry about it, the dictionary will be there when you're ready to look up bias. You have the power to restore your sight. Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!
  15. jcd11235
    I'll believe it when I see it. Some of the most moronic economic proposals I've heard have been from Libertarians. Yeah, that budget surplus and growing economy that we saw during the Clinton administration had disaster written all over them. Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!
  16. jcd11235
    What data did you provide? Your Media Research link? Laughable, not primary data Your UCLA link? Poor methodology, not primary data Your Pew Report? Doesn't indicate what you claim it to indicate If you think most of the SC posters are leftist, that pretty much confirms your own far-right perspective. Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!
  17. jcd11235
    Of the two Democratic candidates, would you expect FOX to treat the more liberal Obama better than the more centrist Clinton? Still can't find any real data? Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!
  18. jcd11235
    I'll take that as a concession that you can't find any real evidence of a liberal bias in the media. From Time Care to compare/contrast the reception of Stephanopoulous' book to the current media masturbation over McLellan's? I knew it was too much to expect from you to keep your word about giving up. You mean the, as your link put it, "tell all book that didn't"? The liberal media that referred Clinton as "this sorry President"? Tell us, what facts about Clinton were already widely known before GS wrote his book that were simply verified? What new facts were offered in the book? Before you try to rest your case on a single piece of anecdotal evidence, you should probably fully establish the similarities. Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!
  19. jcd11235
    He wasn't knowingly lying then, either. He was telling the press what he was being told to tell them. No, I don't think I'd be inclined to have him in my circle of friends before or after he resigned. However, I, unlike you, apparently, am objective enough to understand that just because someone disagrees with me does not mean they're lying. In the media discussion, since you brought it up, you made an assertion and then you were unable to support that assertion with primary data. It didn't mean you were lying. I'm sure you believe the media has a liberal bias, considering the far-right viewpoint you have (if your posts on this forum are any indication). Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!
  20. jcd11235
    LOL. I hope you can appreciate the irony of implying Kallend needs a better understanding of economics, and then referencing how Libertarians currently feel enraged. Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!
  21. jcd11235
    I have no idea. You'll have to ask a "left winger living in a 007-esque fantasy world of conspiracy" to get that answer. You'll probably find him in a cantina somewhere arguing over warm beer with a right wing nut-case who believes that Suddam posed an imminent threat to the United States. It doesn't appear that I am the one trying to avoid facts. Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!
  22. jcd11235
    The Press Secretary is an official voice for the Office of the POTUS. D you really believe that they can speak freely, speak their conscience? It's amazing how many former Cabinet members of this administration have since come forward and spoken more candidly. Do you think that's a coincidence? Your links don't indicate anything except that McClellan took his professional responsibility seriously. His book indicates he also takes his integrity seriously now that he is able to speak candidly and truthfully about his experience in the White House. Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!
  23. jcd11235
    I'll take that as a concession that you can't find any real evidence of a liberal bias in the media. Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!
  24. jcd11235
    I'm sure you think you have a point there somewhere, besides the fact that the Press Secretary serves at the President's pleasure. Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!
  25. jcd11235
    So what you're saying is, except for his foreign policy and his domestic policy, President Bush has not been responsible for any spectacular failures as President? That sounds reasonable. Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!