DaVinci

My company provides many benefits to keep good workers. That is also capitalism at work. Capitalism means that there is a FREE market, not one with artificial wage controls. You do know that several instructors have been trying to form a "Skydiving Instructor Union" for years? They feel that if they all band together that they can force you the DZO to provide HC, and higher wages.

Ah, we have no gotten you to the point that you are not even able to bring a point that we do not prove to be incorrect and you wrong. This is the point that you normally result to insults and childish BS We are right on track. To recap * YOU are ignoring the Founding Fathers intent in the 2nd. * You are fine with YOU having a gun for self defense... But only YOU. * You cannot discuss the topics, so you have started the insults.

Nice try. Try using a real source.

Nope. You only need to register certain types of planes... But only if you USE them. FAIL on you. Also, wanna tell the class if this plane needs to be registered? http://www.affordaplane.com/ FAIL on you again. No, just once again showing you have no idea of what you are talking about. Not my fault you cannot understand English.... As soon as you start. Still waiting on you to answer why you think Emanual won in Chicago.... But you do not have the intestinal fortitude to answer anything honestly.

Many, and on each one you spout opinion not based in fact, make childish slams, and are proven to not know what you are talking about. And yet you are also bleating.... the difference is your opinions are not supported in any fact.

The facts do not (once again) support your position.

Yes, the facts are right there... you make claims that are not supported in fact. Care to ask again... this time without the childish BS?

Ah.... you know you just can't make up something and then claim it as fact right? So you are claiming that workers didn't get wage increases? Yeah, you can't really respond with facts.

Don't know what you are trying to say... But that is not new. I have noticed that when you can't respond logically, you type something like this.

You claimed Reagan started the mess... So your position, once again is not logical.

That's not strange. Maybe true, but what Unions actually did was jack up the wages well above productivity.

That does not eliminate the fact that unions did the same thing.... that they are now paying for.

No one has said that but you... Just like your claims that everyone listens to Rush. No one said that either.

Still convicting people that have not even been charged?

Would you be OK with every airplane sale going through a dealer? Ah, but not to OWN a plane... You failed, not me.

Haven't been really reading have you? Post #110 OF THIS VERY THREAD: 2. Training should be up to the person. I have no issue with States requiring training to get a CHL... In fact, you are ignoring that most States require training to get a CHL. So you failed right there. Fail again. As soon as you start preaching that the 1st only applies to religions that were in existence in 1791 As soon as you start preaching that the internet is not protected by free speech, only printing presses. As soon as you start preaching that the 4th does not apply to cars and only horse and buggies.... It seems only YOU are not willing to change with the times with regard to the 2nd. Fail again... the Founding Fathers didn't want required training... YOU DO. I have already shown that the Founding Fathers wanted anyone capable to have a gun... and you have not even shown anything but your opinion to counter that. I have already shown that the SC agrees with MY interpretation.... Not yours. Who is not complying with the wishes of the Founding Fathers again?

That is not possible.... You said Reagan started the deficit....

Maybe I am one of those evil rich people? Or maybe I understand economics and know that artificially inflating wages past the point of sustainability will result in a crash... Ya know, just like the one the car manufacturers had? You seem to be quite happy with artificially inflated wages for low skill jobs and govt hand outs - Strange...

Great, now find a way to do it without destroying the quality of care, or running the deficit so high we go under. Unlike you, I have access to US controlled HC... I can tell you I pay for my own private HC.

So no training for voting then either? You would see less ND's, but you would not see less CRIME.

It works out well, actually: So the Founding Fathers seemed to clearly mean it to be an individual right. And the Supreme Court has agreed. To try and claim that the 2nd is outdated: 1. Would be like claiming the 1st only protects printing presses, the 4th does not protect email, the 5th to only provide protection for crimes that were crimes in 1791, 8th would not cover 'new' cruel punishments. 2. That position is not supported by any law, or any court decision. More like the govt wanted to CONTROL things and took steps to get control. Much more likely is the continued chipping away of rights based on irrational fears of anti-gun people and gun people alike. Never forget the NRA didn't fight the AWB, didn't fight the Hughes Amendment.... Again, an armed loony is shooting up your office. Would you want to be armed or disarmed?

Got it, you will not answer because you know it would show your own hypocrisy. It is fine for YOU to have guns, just not anyone else.

Deficit spending happened a long time before Reagan. Debts incurred during the American Revolutionary War and under the Articles of Confederation led to the first yearly reported value of $75,463,476.52 on January 1, 1791. ... The buildup and involvement in World War II plus social programs during the F.D. Roosevelt (because of the Great Depression) and Truman presidencies in the 1930s and '40s caused a sixteenfold increase in the gross public debt from $16 billion in 1930 to $260 billion in 1950. To try and blame it on on party, or one person is not based in fact.

You think that spending more than you make is a good idea?????

The same amount of training to be able to vote or any other right listed in the BoR's. Training to own: Nothing. Training to Carry: 1. A course that includes classroom training discussing when lethal force is allowed by law, the consequences of using lethal force, methods of carry, weapons allowed to be carried, prohibited places...etc . 2. A course of fire no more difficult than the standard used for security guards in the State. Now personally, I find that Texas has a pretty good process. I would also like the license to not expire. Personally, I train about 2-3 times a mth. Mainly for fun, but it includes structured fields of fire with mandatory mag changes, malfunctions, and no shoot targets.