
DaVinci
Members-
Content
3,518 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Never -
Feedback
0%
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Dropzones
Gear
Articles
Fatalities
Stolen
Indoor
Help
Downloads
Gallery
Blogs
Store
Videos
Classifieds
Everything posted by DaVinci
-
"Somebody's" Future Crime Prediction In Action
DaVinci replied to JohnRich's topic in Speakers Corner
For those that said the police were correct to confiscate her legally held shotguns *that were not involved and were locked up during this situation*... Why? -
So if I saw a man beating a woman.... I have no duty to do anything in your world? Some see the unborn as the most innocent life. Funny, you are OK with killing the unborn, but get your knickers in a twist over capital punishment. So it is OK to kill innocent children but not a convicted murderer in your world?
-
The issue is why in his great health care provided country did he not get the proper medical care to identify and treat his condition. Show one example of where I have said that.... go ahead find ONE. The point is you ignore the major issue (his mental problems) and instead focus on gun control.
-
Still waiting: Do you have a problem with the phrase "Shall not be infringed"? You love to claim that the SC is the final say.... Cool. But I have shown, using ONLY SC cases, the SCOTUS has said that an individual is allowed an M-16. You have not been able to counter that claim. United States v. Miller: "The Second Amendment protects only the ownership of military-type weapons appropriate for use in an organized militia." DC v Heller: that it is "an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia," "The Amendment’s prefatory clause announces a purpose, but does not limit or expand the scope of the second part, the operative clause" McDonald v. Chicago: that it applies to the States You have shown that it is not an unlimited right.... Yes, and to cite the SC they mentioned prohibitions 'against felons and the insane'. But the fact remains that the SC has ruled that it is an individual right to own a 'military-type weapon' in all of the United States. Can you provide a SINGLE SCOTUS quote that proves your position against my comment? Remember, "Shall not be infringed" is already there as well.
-
So, if I do not agree with you, I don't know anything? Fact is that cells start to divide pretty much after conception. At the very basic level that is considered "life" And an hour old baby could be in the exact same position... would it be ok to just drop them in a bucket of water? Again, Bullshit. You have to tell parents to get a tooth pulled, but not an abortion? Your position makes no sense....
-
I see, I thought we were supposed to play the ball? You have stated support for this.
-
But still able to prove you have nothing but emotions and no facts to support your position. Is the best you can do lame ass insults?
-
I did deal with it... By taking your position and making it look foolish. Still waiting John.... Is this still not a real plane? http://affordaplane.com/ nor this one? http://www.quicksilveraircraft.com/sport.htm You do not need a license or insurance to own AND TO FLY THEM.
-
No, it was a part of the cause. The main reason Federal v States rights. There were tariffs and other tax issues as well as slavery issues. The South felt the North was ignoring them. Not really: Matson v. Rutherford he represented a slave owner trying to get his slave back He held that the federal government was prevented by the Constitution from banning slavery in states where it already existed. "If there be those who would not save the Union, unless they could at the same time save slavery, I do not agree with them. If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them. My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union" -- Lincoln letter in response to an editorial by Horace Greeley "I will say here, while upon this subject, that I have no purpose directly indirectly to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so. I have no purpose to introduce political and social equality between the white and the black races. There is a physical difference between the two, which in my judgement will probably forever forbid their living together upon the footing of perfect equality, and inasmuch as it becomes a necessity that there must be a difference, I, as well as Judge Douglas, am in favor of the race to which I belong, having the superior position. I have never said anything to contrary , but I hold that notwithstanding all this, there is no reason in the world why the negro is not entitled to these as the white man. I agree with judge Douglas he is not my equal in many respects - certainly not in color, perhaps not in moral or intellectual endowment. But in the right to eat the bread, without leave of anybody else, which his own hand earns, he is my equal and the equal of Judge Douglas, and the equal of every living man." -- Lincoln Speech at Columbus, Ohio, September 16, 1859 You can think that (along with most Americans that have not really looked at the issues) but that does not change the fact that the South left due to the North's ignoring the damage the North's plans would have on the South... Slavery was just one of those issues. It is easy, romantic and heroic to think that the war was over slaves.... But it was just not that simple. The slavery issue was one part of the issue, not the issue.
-
Yes, because a monkey would only be used on a black right? http://www.google.com/search?q=bush+as+a+monkey&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
-
And Kallends comments like: "You don't have to break any laws to behave unethically and antisocially. Not that you would understand." Are just cool?
-
Yes, thank God only 846 people were killed and more than 6,000 wounded. http://af.reuters.com/article/egyptNews/idAFLDE73I1M120110419
-
The shooter. AND The judge/legal system: "The 16-year-old charged with murdering the two Britons was freed by a judge two weeks ago after he was arrested over an armed robbery." What in the hell is a violent criminal being released for????
-
President George W. Bush Launches the 4% Project
DaVinci replied to RonD1120's topic in Speakers Corner
So, how is that not playing the player? -
President George W. Bush Launches the 4% Project
DaVinci replied to RonD1120's topic in Speakers Corner
#1. Obama has not released his transcripts... So you cannot really say he did better. #2. I have never claimed Obama was a moron, like the others have of Bush. So your 'assertion' was to ask me questions instead of asking them the questions like I asked them... You are complicit in their attacks on Bush, yet hound me for a comment about something I never implied? You missed this one" And do you think you can just buy a degree from an ivy league?" Do I think Obama is smart? Sure. Do I think Bush is smart? Sure. Do I think Obama is smarter than Bush? I don't know, and it does not really matter. I do know that transcripts showed the Bush did better in school than Gore... Of course *I* don't use that to call Gore "stupid" like some one the ones you seem to be defending. -
It is "unfair"???? I thought we were supposed to learn that life is not "fair". Do you grade your students on results, or do you give everyone an "A" to be "fair"? Good luck with that once you have made sure no one has the weapons to stage a revolt.
-
Funny:
-
President George W. Bush Launches the 4% Project
DaVinci replied to RonD1120's topic in Speakers Corner
Find where I have called him my hero. It is not MY fault you hate him so much and can't bear the thought that he might be smarter than you. -
Still waiting on WHY he did it. The REASONS he did it. Why did this shooter do it? What mental issues did he have? Why was he the one to snap. Then you DON'T know why he did it, no matter the fact you claimed you did. "We already know that, try and keep up." Do you even know what he was diagnosed with?
-
"If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice"
-
President George W. Bush Launches the 4% Project
DaVinci replied to RonD1120's topic in Speakers Corner
And do you think you can just buy a degree from an ivy league? I am not calling Obama: "old tosser" that should be "in a home .... I hear there's a suitable one in Guantánamo" "a eigth [SIC] grader" Claiming he only got into school because of the "Skull and Bones" Saying Obama had to, "BUY an Ivy League education" Find a post from me saying Obama did not earn his degree.... go on.. Look for one and report back.