
jakee
Members-
Content
24,933 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
74 -
Feedback
0%
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Dropzones
Gear
Articles
Fatalities
Stolen
Indoor
Help
Downloads
Gallery
Blogs
Store
Videos
Classifieds
Everything posted by jakee
-
I could be wrong, but I don't think the US Constitution covers property rights. It covers your right be secure against unreasonable seizure of your property. Which is why the blatantly transparent workaround shown above really shouldn't work. 4th Amendment: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
Possibly the most telling paragraph... "The CBP seizure notice gave the Kazazis a number of options for proceeding with the case. They could abandon the cash completely, or they could make an “offer in compromise” — letting CBP keep a certain percentage of the seized cash if it returned the rest. There were also options for challenging the seizure administratively through internal CBP channels or letting the case proceed in federal court. The Kazazis opted for federal court." Because nothing says 'we know you were involved in illicit activity and we have confidence in our case for seizing this money' like offering to split it with you if you shut up and go away The blatantly transparent workaraound is that the criminal proceeding is against your stuff (which doesn't have any rights) instead of you (and your rights). Hence United States of America Vs An artcile consisting of 50,000 cardboard boxes more or less, each containing one pair of clacker balls. Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
That FB clip was posted by the MARS Special Operations Group. And? Where did they get it from? Do you know what the source is? Why do you think it's bonafide? Right, because you believe all the lies that the far right fake news machine is selling you. The real fake news - extremist bloggers with no accountability or journalistic credentials or ethics who simply make stuff up. You said your group 'know who Jarrett is' and posted something utterly false. How do you even know you'd dislike her if you stopped believing the lies? Do you have any idea what you or they would think of her if the only articles you read were truth instead of libellous fiction? That's not what news is. That's another fabrication. You're willingly immersing yourself in the very definition of an echo chamber. All you're hearing is your own prejudice and dishonesty bouncing back at you, turned up to 11. (Still waiting for those photos of road blocks and armed guards, by the way.) You spreading lies. And not having the stones to admit it. Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
And yet you cannot deny that any part of what they wrote about your link is true. What was your bonafide source for the link? What made you trust them while they played you like a fiddle? Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
I'll own that. However, it is a reaction more than a motivation. What’s your motivation for pushing blatant lies about Valerie Jarrett? What’s your motivation for saying there is not one single thing you would be happy for the Republican Party to compromise over with the Dems in the name of bipartisan cooperation? Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
Women accuse Morgan Freeman of inappropriate behavior, harassment
jakee replied to airdvr's topic in Speakers Corner
Because you've invented a circular argument that no-one else is using. You're disagreeing wth your own strawman. Numerous independent accounts by numerous different women over many, many years. Do you want to have an ideagasm? -
Women accuse Morgan Freeman of inappropriate behavior, harassment
jakee replied to airdvr's topic in Speakers Corner
Where does that statement come from? Do you want to have an ideagasm? -
No, they don't. That's a fabrication. If nothing else didn't the syntax give it away? A Stanford psychology student saying she is "A Iranian"? It's pathetic, laughably transparent falsehood. Yet you fell for it like you fall for everything else. Don't you get tired of having the wool pulled over your eyes? Still waiting for photos of those roadblocks, by the way Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
What about those photos? Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
Of course it should be investigated, but only by a team that has no democrats in it. Only a team purely made up of Republicans can be truly unbiased. Unless they're Republicans who didn't support Trump in the Primaries, those guys are totally corrupt shills for the Dems. Trumpeteers from top to bottom, that's the only way it can be fair. Believe me, folks... Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
Women accuse Morgan Freeman of inappropriate behavior, harassment
jakee replied to airdvr's topic in Speakers Corner
That's by the by though really. Most women like sex - it doesn't mean rape is ok. Some women like drugs - it doesn't mean being drugged is ok. There is a huge difference between taking a powerful psychoactive drug willingly and having it slipped in a drink without knowing what's about to happen. Hell, the fact that some women like the drug actually makes it more likely that perverts and rapists would use it - because if they got caught they'd just say "Yeah I gave her some 'luudes, she asked for them. You know how crazy the girl are for that stuff...." Do you want to have an ideagasm? -
I've been forgiven by a bunch of different people for different things. Occasionally (rightly or wrongly) I haven't been forgiven. Is that important for some reason? Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
Women accuse Morgan Freeman of inappropriate behavior, harassment
jakee replied to airdvr's topic in Speakers Corner
They're both well used and well documented date rape drugs. What exactly worries you about how they were equated? Do you want to have an ideagasm? -
Donald Trump did the RIGHT thing on pulling out of Paris Accords
jakee replied to RonD1120's topic in Speakers Corner
Because the market is not a force for good. The market is entirely indifferent to the longterm benefit of society. The market will quite happily fuck you over without noticing or caring if you're in the wrong place or the wrong job at the wrong time. Do you want to have an ideagasm? -
The Great White is going down. Weinstein to face charges
jakee replied to Bob_Church's topic in Speakers Corner
So, definitely any discussion of whether country music sucks, yeah? Do you want to have an ideagasm? -
Response 1: Sure! And in 50 years time when the US economy recovers you can start negotiating the next step with NK. Response 2: Ok, but as long as we’re believing in magic why not just make all of Kim’s weapons disappear and have done with it? I really can’t decide, which one works better? Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
Women accuse Morgan Freeman of inappropriate behavior, harassment
jakee replied to airdvr's topic in Speakers Corner
That's very disappointing. However - while it is sleazy, disgusting and utterly unnacceptable behaviour... Bill Cosby is a serial rapist. On that basis he should not be vilified "like Cosby". "Like Trump" would be more appropriate - though some of the accusations of sexual violence against Trump are still worse. Do you want to have an ideagasm? -
1: Do you know the provenance of the Facebook message? How have you verified its authenticity? Did you even think about it? 2: We know that the "Official Statement" was written at the behest of Cohen. We also know that the statement is, in at least two aspects, a lie. First, we know that she was paid hush money by Trump/cohen. Second, we know that in 2011 she didn't deny the affair, but gave an interview to In Touch magazine confirming the affair. We then know that the interview went unpublished under threat of legal action. So which story is correct? She says something sexual happened, then after being paid she says nothing sexual happened, now she says something sexual happened again. What do you think? Donald Trump, verifiably ratings obsessed host of The Apprentice is a media whore. Donald Trump of the solid gold Trump Tower, Trump Plaza, Trump Taj Mahal, Trump Castle, Trump Shuttle, Trump Steaks, Trump Vodka, Trump Airlines, GoTrump, Trump Magazine, Trump University, the Trump Boardgame (my favourite), Trump ice, the Tour de Trump (), Trump by the Ocean, Trump Network, Trump New Media and Trumped! to name but a few is clearly looking for fame. He'll say anything if it benefits him and he lies all the time. Do you really want to debate that? Give me a break! It doesn't matter how slimy and sleazy Avenatti is. Trump is at least as slimy and sleazy, and so far he's the one who's been caught lying about this matter, not Avenatti, while Avenatti is the one producing evidence, not Trump. Brainwashed, baby By the way, do you think the case against Weinstein is nothing but a witch hunt? If not, what's the difference? Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
If only someone could have predicted it... But unfortunately no-one knew North Korea was so complicated. Ever thought about how Obama weaseled a bunch of hostages out of North Korea without dragging the diplomatic credibility of the US through the mud? And that's good diplomacy that will help the peace process, is it? Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
Trump: Meeting cancelled because of North Korea's "tremendous anger and open hostility". For once I agree with you, definitely wouldn't have happened if Hilary was President. And ended up with the same result as 60+ years of politicians-turned-presidents. Surprising exactly no-one except him and you. And maybe a few others who watch too much Fox and still believe in magic. And today Trump has not only spoken with the Joint Chiefs about being ready to attack North Korea, he has also spoken to South Korea and Japan about joining in and helping pay for any attack. "Peace in our time" right? Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
Given that the pornstar was paid $130,000 by Trump? Given that the contract written by Trump's lawyer explicitly called for video, photographic and text message evidence of the affair to be turned over to Trump? Given that Daniels hasn't once been shown to have lied about this, whereas both Trump and Cohen have provably lied several times to the public about the existence of a contract and their knowledge of a contract? What do you think? So you're saying a guy involved in a dodgy bankruptcy must be lying? Think very carefully before you answer that question... "Couldn't make it up" huh? Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
Yeah, sure. Why not. So could you provide some of the sources that confirm he was being paid by the Democrats to work as a mole for the FBI? Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
You need to get out in front of the IG report? Why, what's it going to say about you? By the way, you never said why you're so sure the report by the IG (appointed by Obama) is going to be trustworthy and the investigation by Mueller (appointed by the Trump administration) is going to be a pack of lies. Why do you think Obama's people are so much better than Trump's people? Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
Yeah, I keep hearing that the rocket and mortar attacks in Texas border towns are much worse than Israel. Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
For real? So he is General Ripper? Do you want to have an ideagasm?