jakee
-
Content
24,933 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
74 -
Feedback
0%
Everything posted by jakee
-
And do you think that is any sort of analog of the reasons why the school system sometimes faills? Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
It's the professionals' fault, is it?* When the Islamist insurgencies were winning back territory in Afghanistan in the mid to late 2000's was it because the US and Coalition soldiers on the ground were incompetent? * Leaving aside that he works for a University, and therefore has nothing to do with the schools system. Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
Which is it, then? Liberal elitist policies have alienated american voters, or the liberal winds of change are blowing so strongly that they're going to carry the midterms and spineless republicans are having scurry to the left because they want to be on the winning side? Can't have it both ways, bub. Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
Nah he's still better at it than you. And as a bonus his grammar makes it possible to understand his posts, whereas a couple of days ago you said this "Stating that he thinks it will take too long and that truck should use his pain!" Pop quiz: Do you even know what that means? Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
Less than a week after Trump read the phrase "seperate but equal" off a teleprompter, with a straight face? Come on. They know, they just don't give a fuck. Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
So the false statements all stemmed from being investigated for improper use of government vehicles, false mileage reimbursement claims and improper use of office renovations? Great - so how's the Scott Pruitt investigation going? Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
Remember that those US women were probably descended from people (like the Founding Fathers) who packed up and ran away to the Americas because (under your template) they couldn't be bothered to fight for change at home. Remember also that those US women had at least a partially democratic system (depending on what time you're looking at) to work within for change. Remember that the two things aren't mutually contradictory. Every country has movements working within it for change, however in some countries there is no democratic process for that change, no imminent hope of that change, and the men in those countries can either kill their wives with impunity for certain real or imagined slights, or even get the state to do it for them. To imply that a woman facing certain death in her country lacks moral fibre for not wanting to stay and fight is a rather shameful attitude... Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
Do you think that because you got the test right that you always get it right in real life? I’m reminded of an article I read on the Bedford Gulfstream crash (a fatal accident caused by gross airmanship failures) that pointed out the crew were both recently recertified on type. They knew perfectly well how to follow correct procedure, but they only switched that part of their brains on when they knew they were being tested. Kinda like the VW diesel emissions scandal. So just because you passed this test (which doesn’t even look at ability to rate the reliability and veracity of purported factual statements), don’t think that’s a guarantee that your brain isn’t churning out giant clouds of smog when you’re out reading Breitbart, Infowars, Fox opinion pieces and wherever else you get your ‘facts’ from. Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
You are a brazen liar. Over the entirety of 2013 the immigration services apprehended 24,000 children in total. In 2018 the immigration services have in detention nearly 11,000 children right now. Doesn't it bother you that practically every single argument you attempt to make in here turns out to be based on provably false facts and fake news? Shouldn't it make you re-examine your world view? Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
Because of course, you would never share fake news and photos you found on the web just because it supports your politics. Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
Then you should be extremely worried about the job Trump is doing Not really. With our form of government; there's enough checks and balances that JoJo the dog-faced boy could sit in that seat for four years. There are zero checks and balances between Trump's mouth and Twitter account and the outside world. If you do think it's important that America is the pinnacle of global respect, then I'll say again that you should be very, very worried about Trump Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
Then you should be extremely worried about the job Trump is doing Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
I guess we can add "the forward progress of time" to the list of things your cut and paste opinions have proved you are oblivious to Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
And he's praised how tough and smart Putin is. He phoned Duterte (apropos nothing) to congratulate him on the incredible job he was doing on the drug problem - with the extradjudicial killing of thousands of suspects - and invited him to the White House. He's now even on the love train with Kim. When are the Trumpettes going to realise that Trump likes dictatorships, he likes totalitarianism, and he likes the idea of an executive that is not constrained by or subject to the rule of law. Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
So you agree with the IG that Comey treated Clinton unfairly in the runup to the election? Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
Oh cool, didn't know that. Thanks! The general point stands though, which is that investigating a President always requires a special prosecutor because the political conflicts of interest are implicit. A special prosecutor's investigation of the West Wing is a normal investigation of the West Wing. Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
There wasn't a special counsel because they threatened to have a special counsel and her lawyers cooperated. Now, say what you will about the bleach bit and missing emails after that... There wasn’t a special counsel because she was Sec State - not the President or the Attorney General. The title Special Counsel doesn’t mean the investigation is special, it simply means it’s being done by someone outside the normal Justice Department chain of command so the investigator isn’t investigating his own boss. So when Rush says the Hillary findings were ok because they cropped up in the course of a normal investigation - that’s exactly the same as what has happened with Manafort, Cohen et al. Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
Well, you said it. Here's the thing: you may think your statement was railing against liberal partisanship, but what you were actually doing was supporting pro-Trump partisanship. Trump deserved to be criticised for calling Kim "Little Rocket Man" and getting sucked into a public war of personal insults that made them both sound like children in a playground argument. Trump deserves to be criticised for praising Kim's leadership of his country and claiming his people love him when he is actually a totalitarian dictator who is continuing a generations old campaign of terror against his own people. Expressing both of these criticisms is not remotely hypocritical, and pretending it's a Catch 22 that Trump couldn't avoid is simply helping to enable the radicals like Nolhtairt and Rush brush the points aside without having to think about them. Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
Don't be absurd. You're smarter than this Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
Yeah, come on. Did you ever think you'd see the day that a US president openly praised a communist dictator of North Korea, telling the world how much he loves his people and how much his people love him? Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
Neither of those two things have anything to do with the Mueller investigation. Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
I bet you are Bet he is what? Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
So you think it doesn't look good that this guy was arrested for lying to the feds? Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
Didn't you learn your lesson the last time you were caught plagiarising a moronic statement from someone else's Twitter account? Rubio blasted Obama's visit as a major concession to Castro - despite the fact that Obama criticised castro, and made sure Castro had to publically face questions about his human rights abuses for the first time ever. Rubio doesn't see Trump's visit as a concession to Kim, despite the fact that Trump has publically fawned over Kim and emphasised what a nice guy he is, what a good leader he is, and how Kim loves the people of NK and the people of NK love Kim. Could you imagine the outcry if Obama had said the same about either of the Castros? What would Rubio have said then? There's your hypocrisy alright Do you want to have an ideagasm?
-
Indeed. A few months ago when Trump was still calling Kim "Little Rocket Man" and promoting tough sanctions it was the right thing to do and the only way to make progress, according to Nol. Now that Trump publically says Kim is a trustworthy man who is a good leader of his country it is the right thing to do and the only way to make progress, and looking down on and demeaning NK would never have brought any change, according to Nol. Do you want to have an ideagasm?