jakee
-
Content
24,933 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
74 -
Feedback
0%
Everything posted by jakee
-
Michael Cohen in prison and Trump a co-conspirator. Good to know that's something you find amusing in a President.
-
No-one knows <insert topic here> better than Trump
jakee replied to kallend's topic in Speakers Corner
Look, when the leader of a nation simply makes things up to support a policy direction he is taking, it matters. -
No-one knows <insert topic here> better than Trump
jakee replied to kallend's topic in Speakers Corner
Great. 4 years ago the GOP moaned that Obama wasn't Presidential enough. Now they celebrate Trump acting like a maladjusted teenager on 4Chan. Everytime you think the right couldn't get any more pathetic, they keep finding a way -
Good lord, a country with hundreds of millions of people invented more things than a country with a few million people. I never would have guessed that if you hadn't told us. I am stunned, speechless, shocked and awed that it is the case. How is such a wondrous achievement even possible? I am now fully prepared to buy into your entire argument. One quick question though, did the US also lead the world in international patents before the current round of tax cuts and deregulation?
-
From another article; The WHO announcement came on advice from 22 cancer experts from 10 countries, who reviewed more than 400 studies on processed meat covering epidemiological data from hundreds of thousands of people.
-
But how does quoting the weather from 4 seasons previous help to discern that?
-
Because you're citing how much it rained between 18 months and 2 years before the fire started?
-
No-one knows <insert topic here> better than Trump
jakee replied to kallend's topic in Speakers Corner
They are literally meant to be taken literally. -
No-one knows <insert topic here> better than Trump
jakee replied to kallend's topic in Speakers Corner
I know a lot about wind," he added. With his diet, I believe him. -
Ok, what is your next question? So far “why is it controversial” is the only question you’ve asked about it. Now you don’t want to talk about that, what do you want to talk about?
-
Actually Bill, it doesn’t look like that’s what it said. From skimming the outline it says $350bn cost from extreme weather and fire events. Some extreme weather and fire would happen anyway, you can’t attribute the whole cost to climate change.
-
I find Billy's posts make a lot more sense after I hit CTRL-ALT-RIGHT.
-
Dude that proves nothing. If they can fake the moonlanding they can fake some carrier footage! Open your eyes...
-
These posts are despicable, Billy. You’re slandering thousands of dead veterans and war heroes because you disagree with a handful of political decisions by one of them. This is how the modern right supports the military, is it? Sickening.
-
Yeah, I did. Which is why I know that when you say it’s a rural and urban issue and the suburbs are ‘Im alright Jack’ you’re contradicting your source, who said; “"One of the points I think that’s important to make, this is not just a Richmond issue. It’s not just urban; it’s rural, it’s suburban, it’s not just Democrat or Republican. It’s a statewide issue." So, y’know, there’s that. Also, there’s no demonstration of causality between voting system and school funding, or explanation of how cuts following the recession would have been alleviated if cotes for state offices were weighted away from the suburbs. You’re simply asserting that they would be, the same way you’re asserting that the EC makes things better. You haven’t provided any support for that assertion. Finally, if people shouldn’t be a metric of voting power, what should be and how do you figure it out?
-
How is that an example of it?
-
Do you think you could try without the misogyny for like 24 hours at least? No commitments yet, just give it a spin and see how it feels, yeah?
-
What does any of that have to do with what we're talking about?
-
What you've basically just said is that without a capitalist system you wouldn't have a capitalist system. No shit. Regardless of which, if as you said you're reacting to people who complain about income inequality you have utterly missed the point of what those people are complaining about. You're having an imaginary argument with imaginary people.
-
Geography restriction, can't read it.
-
You see the irony, right?
-
But you’re using ‘every man for himself’ as the justification for the EC.
-
Exactly, so why are you now lying about it? Honestly, I don’t understand the mentality. You know what your OP said, you know that I and everyone else know what your OP said, so why lie about what it said? What’s the point?
-
I’ll explain it by pointing out that you’re lying. Bernie Sanders held his first elected office in his 40th year, and (obviously) had several jobs before that. His wife also has her own career.
-
Don’t lie. What’s the point? You made a positive statement about how the world works, full stop.
