jakee

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content

    24,933

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    74

  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by jakee

  1. jakee

    Tariffs

    jakee replied to billvon's topic in Speakers Corner

    So your point is that you could tolerate Trump instead of Hillary for President, despite not being able to identify anything that Hillary has done that is not matched or worse by Trump?
  2. jakee

    Tariffs

    jakee replied to billvon's topic in Speakers Corner

    Wouldn't that be the point?
  3. jakee
    He demanded an apology from the ‘fake news media’ for saying he called Markle nasty, I wonder what the chances are of him apologising for lying about it?
  4. jakee
    Ah I see, no worries then. But as a purely state level law it doesn't have to be, right? They're not necessarily subject to the US Constitution the same way that Federal laws are. But the Constitution does give control of any interstate issues to the Fed, and is interpreted as putting restrictions on Federal abortion laws, so can a state legislate that its citizens are subject to stricter laws than that, no matter if they are moving and trading interstate? Seems to me that the answer should clearly be no, but I'm not sure if it actually works that way.
  5. jakee
    The real world chances of parts of the law being eliminated sooner rather than later? Therefore the real world effects the law will have on real women? Therefore everything to do with everything this thread is about? I mean, for fucks sake man, how desperate for an argument are you?
  6. jakee
    Is that at all Constitutional? It sounds like it shouldn't be, but that's no guarantee.
  7. jakee

    Tariffs

    jakee replied to billvon's topic in Speakers Corner

    For what purpose? Specific enough that you can keep playing this game of pretending you've backed up your assertion, or specific enough to actually back up your assertion?
  8. jakee

    Tariffs

    jakee replied to billvon's topic in Speakers Corner

    Yet never with any specific examples, as far as I've seen.
  9. jakee
    And what you wrote to me was that he WAS....
  10. jakee
    In his own words, he was a registered Republican for most of his adult life.
  11. jakee
    Hang on a minute - you said that everything Comey has ever done shows he's not a Republican, then you said he's not a Republican because he's a sell out, now you're saying you don't actually know if he's a sell out? You said I only disagreed with your version because I was biased and had gilded eyes, now it turns out that you haven't even decided if you believe your version yet? What's your endgame here? Are you really posting just to generate an argument?
  12. jakee
    Right, so that's the only thing you can name that proves he's never been a genuine Republican? Publically investigating the Democrat candidate during a Presidential election? Are you for real?
  13. jakee
    Did what, though? Or are you just going to cop out again and say 'everything'? As what?
  14. jakee
    So is it politics or is it business?
  15. jakee
    So the public announcements of Clinton investigations during an election were anti-Republican, were they? His almost lifelong Republican party affiliation was nothing but a long-con, because he somehow knew he'd one day be in a position to undermine a Republican president? Come on, look past your own bias and see how crazy you sound. Look ast your own bias and think that if you're incapable of identifying any specific things that Comey has actually done to support your argument then you might just be talking crap.
  16. jakee
    Nothing that Comey has actually done himself, then?
  17. jakee
    What makes you say that, exactly?
  18. jakee
    Funny, it’s so complete and self explanatory to everyone else that you believe all this crap because it strokes your own ego to think you’re the only one capable of understanding it, but it would take more than a lifetime to get you to see that.
  19. jakee
    Eh? If Tesla is sold off but keep making Teslas as a division of another company then in what way would you not be wrong?
  20. jakee
    How was it sensationalised?
  21. jakee
    Go on then. ”Why does it seem like I'm the only one that does that?” Confirmation bias.
  22. jakee
    Lol, you're so desperate to never have to say you're sorry, aren't you? Instead of jumping into this thread to try and manufacture some drama with your sensationalist manipulations of what was posted, wouldn't it have been easier to just have a sense of humour?
  23. jakee
    You can take that up with the designers of this new dogshit forum software. I'd consider myself moderately internet savvy, but if there's an obvious way to edit font size or formatting here then I can't see where the heck it is.
  24. jakee
    The fact that they suggested it needed to be rebuilt to a significantly higher standard suggests to me that the original standard wasn't good enough. Unless the original engineers were unfamiliar with the concept of rain? Again, in context, that would definitely fall under the heading of irony.
  25. jakee
    Lol, right. Funny thing about the internet, you can read it from almost anywhere. Who knew?