
jakee
Members-
Content
24,933 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
74 -
Feedback
0%
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Dropzones
Gear
Articles
Fatalities
Stolen
Indoor
Help
Downloads
Gallery
Blogs
Store
Videos
Classifieds
Everything posted by jakee
-
Yep. You started a thread to call a candidate an idiot who demonstrates the entire party lacks reason, logic and common sense when they did nothing wrong but accidentally misspeak one word. You also refuse to back down, despite the fact you're simultaneously actively defending Trump from criticism over his latest nonsensical speech. You're proving Bill to be exactly, 100% right..
-
There were allegations of rape and sexual assault against Trup long before he ran for office. You appear to be saying that makes them more credible, yeah? So you also believe that Harvey Weinstein should be hired back by Miramax immediately, yes?
-
What the actual fuck are you talking about? He does not agree with you. why are you so desperate to dig yourself deeper and deeper and deeper into this hole? The man said one word wrong. One. Word. If if you are truly open minded, why can you not just acknowledge that this is the case? It doesn’t show that dema are illogical. It doesn’t show that dems lack reason. It doesn’t show that this guy is an idiot. He just misspoke. Why cant you just man the fuck up and admit you overreacted?
-
Because you're being a massive hypocrite. You're in the other thread telling Bill that you're totally open minded about supporting democrats and you aren't looking for any excuse not to support one - and you're in here calling the guy an idiot for a single, simple slip of the tongue. And now you refuse to say your premise (that it demonstrates a lack of logic among dems as a whole) is mistaken. The other guy who is one of the most staunchly right wing posters on the whole site? Yeah way to go, that sure proves you're not biased and partisan.
-
Lol, sorry dude, that just doesn't work here. There is no reason at all except for partisan bias that you won't admit that this guy simply made a slip of the tongue and your whole thread is an overreaction. Allow me to contrast two recent events: Democrat says Trans-female instead of trans-male - Turtle starts a thread to call him an idiot and won't accept any other explanation. Trump says there were airports in the revolutionary war - Turtle says he may be inarticulate but people don't give him enough credit for how smart he is. Question - does Turtle treat left and right differently?
-
He's parroting baseless predictions from an imaginary leaker within the intelligence agencies who claims to be leading a group of true patriots against the 'deep state' govenrment takeover by hardline democrat child sex traffickers. It's the most well known, ludicrous and absurd conspiracy theory of the past few years. Just because you aren't aware that it's batshit crazy doesn't mean it's any less batshit crazy. And it is batshit crazy. Like, genuinely beyond insane.
-
Remember when Obama was in office and the R's had this bee in their bonnet about the USA losing international prestige? Now for the umpteenth time, direct evidence that the world is laughing at Trump and are they bothered?
-
You're still active in the other thread proving him absolutely right.
-
Yes, we've covered that. Everyone kows a trans-woman can't get pregnant - including the person you started this thread to bash. Are you still not ready to put aside your partisan bias and admit that?
-
I wonder how far prosecutorial immunity goes. They broke the law, and in effect entered into a criminal conspiracy with a known serial paedophile to protect him from justice and actively enable him to (most likely) continue raping and pimping a huge number of children. I cannot fathom what could have lead all of these people to so completely abandon their duty in favour of such a vile and morally repugnant course of action - and it would be only right if they could also be charged with his crimes as I believe could and would happen if they were ‘normal’ people.
-
rape defendant from 'good family' deserves leniency
jakee replied to JerryBaumchen's topic in Speakers Corner
Ok then. In your mind Harvey Weinstein should be hired back by Miramax immediately, I guess. -
Battle vehicles were used. You can't manufacture this anger at people using the word 'tank' wrong then justify it by quoting someone who says 'battle vehicle'. That's just stoopid. Again, I have absolutely no idea how you think any of those things support the point you are trying to make. Who was it who told everyone it would be a big beautiful arade with tanks in it. Oh yeah, Trump did. Yeah, he is full of shit.
-
Did you? I have literally no idea how you could possibly think they support your rant. What do you think prompted it?
-
If it's not the objection, then what does the type of armored vehicle have to do with whether any outrage was misguided? Right, but it's also a thread that is utterly devoid of any outrage at the existence of a supposed tank parade.
-
I would like to know who you’ve been talking to who specifically said that their objection to the parade was solely based on the idea that it would have main battle tanks in it. It would be really interesting to find out who was thinking that.
-
You do realise that if the Q organisation exists, they are the Deep State, right?
-
rape defendant from 'good family' deserves leniency
jakee replied to JerryBaumchen's topic in Speakers Corner
Careful you don’t put your back out moving those goalposts. -
rape defendant from 'good family' deserves leniency
jakee replied to JerryBaumchen's topic in Speakers Corner
What has Harvey Weinstein done? And please provide proof, not "he said she said". -
rape defendant from 'good family' deserves leniency
jakee replied to JerryBaumchen's topic in Speakers Corner
I think whatever system they use to select Judges in those parts is broken. I think it also shows pretty clearly that social justice (or lack of) is a real thing. -
Post something that doesn't deserve to be snarked at. Again, you posted that true liberty existed in the USA when possession of it depended on your political leanings. Freedom that depends on political affiliation doesn't sound like liberty to me, it sounds like Stalinism. If you're genuinely trying to clarify things, clarifying that would be a good start.
-
So, what is your reason to assume this guy is an idiot? Right now you're over in the other thread moaning at Billvon for saying that you do exactly what you're currently doing here. He challenged you to prove him wrong. Here is your opportunity.
-
But he hasn’t said anything to indicate he’s changed his mind, and it’s not exactly a clarification. As far as I can tell he’s attempting to hold two contradictory opinions at the same time. That’s my honest assessment.
-
So you don't actually want liberty in the real world, and liberty never existed in the nation. Ok then.
-
And a slip of the tongue about transgender abortion rights from a minor candidate should drag people away from them? Because... why? So again, are you ready to admit your premise on starting the thread was wrong, or are you going to keep displaying the depth of the anti-Democrat bias you claim you don't have?
-
You're saying liberty existed as long as you held the right political opinions? You get why that's unbelievably stupid, don't you?