jakee
-
Content
24,932 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
74 -
Feedback
0%
Everything posted by jakee
-
Actually, no. You are and you know you are. You are assuming that claims in the article are true, just like you've been assuming for a while that there's a conspiracy around Epstein's death. Why else would you be taking exception to my post, which says the claims she is hiding out with SEAL protection are "not necessarily" true? Does that sound like a wild assumption to you?
-
Jesus dude, try switching your brain on for two seconds before you start typing. How would you prove that any given person didn't take a bribe?
-
Well yeah, you had to really given that you are already making massive assumptions.
-
Without any backup of the claim beyond a statement from the Iranian ministry of truth I’m not going to pay it any mind. Why should I? Do you trust Iran that much?
-
Iran stirring some shit. The effectiveness of Russia's online disinformation campaigns hasn't gone unnoticed. They know that simply making an allegation like this will have an effect on those that want to believe it.
-
Right - you are assuming that anonymous claims from a friend of a vile and disgusting pedophile enabler are true. I'm not assuming anything.
-
It doesn't necessarily mean there is any bill. The article is a transparent attempt to drum up some public sympathy for a truly evil woman who knows she might soon have to face a jury over her many crimes by trying to paint her as a victim. The Mirror are going along with it because they'll print literally anything within 7 degrees of seperation of any member of the Royal Family if there's dirt involved. It's worthless gutter journalism.
-
That's because you're being irrational.
-
Which is, again, any different to any other part of the world because...? I mean hell, you are doing the exact same thing right now. Justifying potentially going to war today because of what their great grandfathers did centuries ago.
-
It is our fault. They're not over here, we're over there. How many middle easterners think the same thing about any US president you care to name? Why, because they've always been at war? Join the fucking club. Have you ever seen a timelapse of European borders? Thousands of years of constant war. We only stopped fighting each other because we became so good at it we would have literally destroyed the planet if we tried it again. But even that didn't stop us from fighting - we just went to the effort of travelling all over the rest of the world to go and find places to fight in. But do you think you can have a discussion with white western europeans? Pretty sure you do. There is nothing unique about the fact the ME has been in constant conflict for centuries. There are no fundamental differences between them and us. Claims that there are can only be founded on wilful ignorance and racism.
-
And it's always been fucked up by people taking irrational approaches. And why is he an official in a government that allows him to take those actions? Because we once overthrew a democratic government for corporate profit. There is a direct lineage of cause and effect from what we did then to what's hapening now. This is where irrational aggression gets you. We could have been, if we hadn't fucked it all up on numerous occasions.
-
It's just their normal dumbass method of only looking at half the story. In this case, since the Obama administration used drone strikes, all drone strikes must be ok no matter where or who the target is. If Trump stabbed someone on live TV one of these guys would claim it's fine because Obama also used a knife to butter his toast in the morning.
-
So what? No-one is dismissing it out of hand. They're dismissing based on the fact that all available non-foreign propaganda based information shows it to be false. That you apparently can't tell the difference just shows once again the depth of your anti-democrat bias.
-
Starting the new year the same way you finished the old one I see.
-
He ignores the fact that if the Q organisation really existed it would, by any definition, be the Deep State.
-
So far that's only contempt fines and legal costs to the plaintiff for timewasting. The case hasn't even gone to trial yet, so it's going to be more. Lots more.
-
That's a satirical site. It's made up.
-
I haven't considered that, because it's absurd. Jokes aside, when people really die in floods there generally wasn't enough help to save them.
-
Because Trump wraps himself in the glory of the military service of others every chance he gets. He feels like a very great and brave soldier. No one is better or stronger at the military than he is. Constantly he talks about the military as a way to bolster his own profile, and quite regularly he denounces his political rivals for imagined cowardice during their own service. He's not wrong for dodging the draft. He's wrong for being a hypocritical scumbag about it ever since.
-
Why not? What does that have to do with Trump running the most criminal administration ever? I must have missed the CNN presidency, because I really can't see how that's relevant.
-
No, that's bollocks. The idea that the neutral point must be half way between two viewpoints is absurd. No other President has ever had his associates arrested, charged and imprisoned the way Trump has. Trump's swamp is his own new invention. Put aside your blind adoration and learn to think for yourself.
-
He only wrote one paragraph.
-
I'm just going to answer this one again because it's the most rampantly hypocritical and dishonest thing you've posted in the whole thread. Nigel posted about what his family did this holiday and you're raging about him supposedly wanting everyone else to conform. Ron explicitly posted that he wants everyone to join his religion next year and you thanked him for the message. Seriously, bro. WTF?
-
No he's not. He's singling out the people who do it. That's it. He hasn't said one single nasty thing about anyone else. Period. You're only assuming he is because you're projecting your anger onto him - as you have explicitly said you are doing. Please quote the passage he has written that says that. But you are rehashing it. You've said that's what you are doing, and that it's why you assume Nigel is motivated by anger and aggression. Because you were. He's not you.
-
What do you mean you're not going to? You just fucking did.
