
jakee
Members-
Content
24,932 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
74 -
Feedback
0%
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Dropzones
Gear
Articles
Fatalities
Stolen
Indoor
Help
Downloads
Gallery
Blogs
Store
Videos
Classifieds
Everything posted by jakee
-
What news is there to report in this manhunt?
-
What news has there been?
-
So you are a goldfish? 'Cos we did this already. "Without it we would still be a bunch of Neolithic warring tribes." "You would still be wearing a loincloth and hunting with a spear if it weren’t for religion." "I merely pointed out, without it we would still be wearing loincloths and killing our neighbors with spears."
-
And what would that be? Yes, the suggestion that they are less human as a result is clearly bigoted. Is that still not obvious to you?
-
It's a matter of fact that you said they couldn't. Several times.
-
Yes, that's exactly what I'm accusing you of, because it's exactly what you've been doing for months. Imagine my shock and surprise that you don't like it being turned back onto you. Did you clarify it though? From where I was sitting I only saw you dodge the issue with a gay joke. You tell me. You said it.
-
And yet that's the word he used. Several times. People here have a tendency to get mad when you assume they mean something they didn't say, so I'm going to stick with what he said. And I don't think many of the people he accuses of bigotry and mirroring the thoughts of genocidal mass murderers are either. He can't have it both ways.
-
He said atheists either suppress their humanity or lack it all together. I think the definition of humanity makes it pretty clear that’s at least as bigoted and as reminiscent of the thought processes that lead to atrocities as most of the stuff he winges about.
-
You were never in. You have nothing to say. Not only have you flatly refuses to support your argument, you’ve failed to even make clear what it is. Almost every post you have made has been an absolute contradiction of the one preceding it. It’s an almost textbook example of someone attempting to win an argument by baffling with bullshit.
-
"If you want to take a look at a society that still worships frogs and trees I give you this peace loving tribe https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yanomami (the frogs never gave them ten commandments)" If the implication is not that they would be more peaceful if they had a theistic religion, then what is it?
-
Right, so why on earth did you just say religion had nothing to do with humanity's progress to being sophisticated, modern states when you're now back to saying it was pivotal? You are all over the place my man. Now let's try again, why was religion pivotal in the advancement of civilisation? A) They're an isolated tribe in the jungle. Show me any tribe that lives in a similar location that independently developed advanced civilisation. B) How are they different to other tribes? They fight? Everyone fights.
-
"I hope you guys realize that religion played a pivotal role in the development of civilization" Honestly dude. What's wrong with you?
-
Then you made it very badly. I asked you twice to explain your position before I made any other comment and you flat out refused. So how about in future if you want to make your point, don't deliberately fail to clearly express it. Sound fair? Cool. And since it didn't stop people from killing other people, what did religion have to do with it?
-
"I hope you guys realize that religion played a pivotal role in the development of civilization. Without it we would still be a bunch of Neolithic warring tribes." Are you a goldfish?
-
Right, now we're wearing jeans and killing our neighbours with guns. Good thing religion sorted that out for us.
-
It really is. Controversial, not true. And again, that means you're using bad logic and lying about it. Can't have it both ways. You must have an incredibly dim view of anthropology, because it's absolute claptrap. Exhibit a: War. It never stopped, it just got bigger. The only way religion is responsibe for stopping us from being tribes fighting with spears is if the religious leaders were the guys who invented nastier weapons than spears. I mean for crying out loud, if you think belief in god scared us all into being nice to each other I don't even know what planet you're living on. Have you literally walked through your entire life with your eyes closed?
-
Why do you lie so much? Didn't religion teach you that was wrong? "Without it we would still be a bunch of Neolithic warring tribes." "You would still be wearing a loincloth and hunting with a spear if it weren’t for religion." "I merely pointed out, without it we would still be wearing loincloths and killing our neighbors with spears."
-
No it isn't. The way that societies evolved always involved religions because religions of one form or anither have always been present. That doesn't make them necessary. "It happened this way therefore it could never have happened any other way" is bad logic.
-
Impeachment is not a criminal investigation. It's basically an internal disciplinary hearing run by politicians. At best it's an employment tribunal. Analogous to a criminal investigation? Fugeddaboutit. Stupid argument and you know it.
-
No, I've been quite consistent in pointing out hypocrisy over the years. If you wanted to look back you'll see I've said the same thing many times - I don't care if people are polite or insulting, but I can't stand the ones who moan and moan about courtesy from others and then come out and throw insults. Pretty much every post Coreece has made over the last 6 months has been moaning about (often imagined) bigotry from supposed anti-christians, then he comes out and says something clearly bigoted. I don't see why it's difficult for either of you to grasp the reason I pointed it out.
-
What makes you think that? I mean seriously, it's the most hilariously clueless argument I've ever heard. In pretty much every civilisation around the world people only stopped killing their neighbours with spears when they invented better weapons to kill people with than spears. Well, every civilisation except the ones that were invaded and destroyed by the ones who invented better weapons first.
-
I don't think all of that is an accurate representation of what he said. Right, and Christians viewing people who don't share the same religion (or any religion) as without humanity has resulted in its fair share of atrocities too. Surely your own argument is proving that I'm right to take you to task about it? I've defended him when you've accused him of saying things he hasn't said. I'm taking you to task because you're being a massive hypocrite. I really don't care about you saying obviously stupid things about the whole atheist population, but I kinda don't want to let you get away with being that two faced without pointing it out. Hang on, that was you again, wasn't it? You said you called them frigid bigots because it was funny. What does the article about Iceland have to do with my position? You've tried to tie it to me twice now and I really don't get why you're having such a hard time remembering that you engaged with it, not me.
-
So? That's not the same thing as the claim you are making.
-
I'm constantly amazed at how you and Turtle find more and more creative ways to admit that you don't have a clue what you're talking about.
-
Explanation being?