jakee
-
Content
24,925 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
74 -
Feedback
0%
Everything posted by jakee
-
Post trump Legal Actions, Including his Enablers
jakee replied to Phil1111's topic in Speakers Corner
Exactly. He has a sense of self preservation and he knows what plays well to the mob. Keeping them out of a combination of laziness, incompetence and spite is entirely in character and something he could have gotten away with. Being caught profiting off them is not. And again, if you applied the same standard of proof to this as you do to ‘what does he flush down his toilet’ then you’d be arguing against your own position as well. -
Post trump Legal Actions, Including his Enablers
jakee replied to Phil1111's topic in Speakers Corner
Oh hey look, it’s the last word -
Post trump Legal Actions, Including his Enablers
jakee replied to Phil1111's topic in Speakers Corner
I thought you Canucks were the ones who understood irony? -
If it was bleached where did they get her emails from? If they did nothing, why were they publicly announcing the progress of their investigation while the 2016 election was happening? If they were too lenient, why did Trump’s own Justice Department report say the investigation was fair and the conclusion correct? ’Blinders’ is the joke of the day.
-
The FBI investigated Clinton too - in public in the heat of the election season. What on earth makes you think they were being any less aggressive then?
-
Post trump Legal Actions, Including his Enablers
jakee replied to Phil1111's topic in Speakers Corner
But he was about to give them back! But they knew he took them and said it was ok! But he has top security clearance anyway so what’s the problem! But they were kept in a building protected by Secret Service, what could be safer! But… but… but! Backflipping? Nah. They’ll have an excuse for anything. And ‘but his giant illegal stockpile of nuclear secrets’ just isn’t that catchy. -
Post trump Legal Actions, Including his Enablers
jakee replied to Phil1111's topic in Speakers Corner
And they all cheered along when Trump said suspects should be treated rough. People being arrested should have their heads smashed against door frames, and if any of ‘those’ suspects gets to the station with two black eyes or worse that’s all part of the process. But carry out a fully legal search warrant against a private citizen who just happens to be a right wing darling and suddenly that’s too heavy handed. That’s weaponisation of justice. That’s unprecedented persecution. Bunch of hypocritical whining fucking snowflakes. -
-
And that changes what you wrote? You're positive that Trump was monetising top secret national security documents because you think he would but you need courtroom standard proof that he flushed some paper down the toilet? Ah the last resort of the passive-aggressive.
-
No I didn't. You said the story about Trump's disregard for the PRA was a nothingburger. The FBI says it's a big somethingburger. I have no idea why you're trying to weasel your way out of this. Anyone can make a mistake, it's not a big deal.
-
Post trump Legal Actions, Including his Enablers
jakee replied to Phil1111's topic in Speakers Corner
I would't credit him with that much vision, and I'm sure even his most sycophantic advisors would have refused to let him take the insane legal and PR risk that would come along with that. Occam's razor said he took them out of spite and petulance and held on to them because he thought he was immune to the consequences. -
What on earth would ever make you think that? Documents he kept because of his chronic disregard for the PRA, of which the documents flushed down the toilet is an equal part. It is illegal. He was breaking the law, he was categorically told he was breaking the law, he kept breaking it. That isn't nothing.
-
Right? It appears that Brent has run away from this thread with his tail between his legs. If he does come back and explain what it is he thinks is too woke about these films, it would be great if he could also explain why he is so gleefully in favour of cancel culture trying to sink them at the box office.
-
The FBI thinks it’s a real somethingburger now!
-
At the end of the day, what is the point of human misery unless someone else is profiting obscenely from it?
-
Two men looking at each other’s bodies? The Trump campaign is now too woke to ever succeed - just ask Brent.
-
They have to show solidarity with the governments of Saudi Arabia, Egypt and China et al. You know, the kind of government they really want.
-
You brought up the film, you called it woke, I’m asking you. What is it you’re scared of saying? No, that’s according to you. You called Lightyear woke and that’s because it has two females kissing. You called Wonder Woman 1984 woke, and why is that except for the fact that it has a female lead character?
-
I guess you never noticed covid. It was the most popular streaming film of the year, and WB are happy enough with its performance that they’re making both a sequel and a spin-off as we speak. And by the way, what exactly is ‘overly woke’ about it? Female lead characters? Is that the thing that’s a step too far for you?
-
“It ended a couple of months later when Sartain became pregnant and she told his wife. Leveridge then moved to void her pretrial diversion, though it was later reinstated by a special prosecutor who took over for Leveridge in the case. ….Leveridge told investigators he met Sartain through a probation officer with whom he was also having sex.” Sounds legit to me.
-
Post trump Legal Actions, Including his Enablers
jakee replied to Phil1111's topic in Speakers Corner
It’s nowhere near that simple. His trial lawyers may be so incompetent it seems like their strategy was to shoot for a mistrial on the grounds of malpractice but his money men probably know what they’re doing. The fight to find the assets he claims don’t exist is going to go on for years. -
Post trump Legal Actions, Including his Enablers
jakee replied to Phil1111's topic in Speakers Corner
That’s a big chunk of his current worth, and there are many more judgements against him to come. Now the question is whether they can find it and pry it out if his hands. https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/aug/05/sandy-hook-families-to-seek-punitive-damages-beyond-41m-ordered-from-alex-jones -
Well there’s a total non sequitur. Going by Windsor’s logic of ‘what you always complain about is what you really are’….
-
That’s quite the pivot, but at least you’ve moved on from your insane argument that oil companies want to act in a way that drives down oils prices. Anyway, you’ve guaranteed us that the red wave is coming and Democrats are about to be wiped out. Why do you think the oil company analysts are guaranteeing that you’re wrong?
-
So you don't know what you're talking about, and you just blindly copied someone else's work because it supported your disgust over over seeing gay people represented on film.
