Conundrum

I didn't say they were ugly, just that I don't think they're hot.

SO CUTE!

Eva mendes is better looking but I don't consider either of them "hot".

You know they make a 250cc sportbike, right?

I'm just curious if you're going to answer my questions...?

Ew. http://www.suzukicycles.com/Products/GSXR1000K8 ^orange please.

I love all the brown nosing in here.

Sport bike. If I wanted to sit on a couch I'd stay home.

I don't doubt he can, I was just saying that's probably why he's losing the contest.

He's winning because his text is much better. I don't think Terry realized it was an essay writing contest. Proper spelling and grammar makes it an essay contest?

lol Anyway, I am suprised the dean of any school would write an e-mail with profanity in it while addressing an employee, and while I'm not saying was he did was okay, you being late is unacceptable and unprofessional - especially because there is no reason, you're just late. I would keep a copy of this email for your records and be to your class on time. Or quit and find a new job.

13 is also my favorite number.

He's winning because his text is much better.

w00t! Awesome 'Shell!

"Poeple insist on calling it luck..."

That's a good question. Two reasons: 1. I won't license anything until it is throughly proven on my product. Usually that take about five years, or a million jumps or so. (I remember only too well how some other manufacturers almost ruined the three ring by making "improvements") 2. Once it was proven, I incorporated the Collins' into the Skyhook, and the test period started all over again. And now that the Skyhook is a proven item, (over seven thousand in use, with millions of jumps, and thousands of actual uses) I can't believe anyone would want to jump with an RSL without a Skyhook. It simply doesn't make any sense. So I decided to license them both, as a unit, last year. As you can see, I went about introducing the Skyhook very methodically, because I knew that because it was such a radial idea, if even one serious problem happened within the first 5 years / 1 million jumps, that the whole idea would be dead. Luckily everything has gone well, and the Skyhook/ Collins' Lanyard seems to be the most technically perfect device I have yet developed. From what I've gathered reading back issues of magazines and stuff, you made the addition of the Collin's Lanyard mandatory on all of your tandem rigs in the field when it was introduced, but I've never seen it mentioned at all in any advertisements for your soprt or student rigs from then until the Skyhook. I have an old Para-Gear catalog from '99-'00, and the ad for your student rig mentions an RSL, but doesn't mention the Collin's Lanyard. Wouldn't your "proving stage" go faster if you had it available on these rigs too? Why not license the Collin's Lanyard to other manufacturers after your first "proving stage" if there is such a need to keep people safe? It seems like such a simple device that it would be hard for someone mess it up- left side cable goes through loop attached to RSL lanyard- pretty basic. Certainly more basic than the system you license it with, no? (I watched a Skyhook demo jump in Elsinore a couple of years ago that was just a normal RSL deployment).

Is the Collin's Lanyard available for licensing separate from the Skyhook? If it is, why wasn't there really an (apparent) marketing push for it until the Skyhook?

Well that sucks.

*fart*

I play every Sunday. I loves me some golf.

Happy Birthday Shannon.

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/110157.php

I refer to them as DZ Ho's.

So, what happens if you get one pregnant?

No No, you need to keep reading, he's not always honest. He lies to get women in bed. "Welcome to the real world." Awesome, isn't it? I think he should write a book. I'd buy one.