brenthutch

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content

    11,005

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    37

  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by brenthutch

  1. brenthutch
    Got it.
  2. brenthutch
    Why don't you restate your argument (this is the second time I have asked).
  3. brenthutch
    No it’s bit more nuanced than that. I will break it down for you. 1. No evidence of: more floods, droughts, wildfires, hurricanes,(AKA the Four Horsemen of the climate apocalypse) tornadoes, desertification, a Midwest dust bowl, mass population evacuations, polar bear extinction, or an ice free Arctic by 2013. 2. The increase in CO2 and tiny bit of warming that we have had, is not an existential threat and has thus far been been beneficial. (Less deserts, more food, (exactly the opposite of what was predicted)) 3. CO2 mitigation efforts are nothing more than futile gestures that hamstring economic development and reduce our ability to deal with disasters when they do occur. (Carbon footprint and deaths from natural disasters have an inverse relationship)
  4. brenthutch
    Wow! A triple! I must have hit a nerve.
  5. brenthutch
    Wrong that AGW hasn't caused more floods, droughts, wildfires, hurricanes, tornadoes, desertification, a Midwest dust bowl, mass population evacuations, polar bear extinction, and an ice free Arctic by 2013? It would appear from actual observation that my skepticism has been vindicated. Disaster is always right around the corner yet never seems to quite manifest I get it, facts won't change any minds, y'all pray to your prophet Saint Greta on the alter of the IPCC, Climatism is your religion.
  6. brenthutch
    Just what is your argument?
  7. brenthutch
    Let me get this straight, climate models are difficult and complex yet they are infallibility accurate? (You are new here so I will let you know that the warmists on this forum claim the latter) Given that I predicted Tesla would be bankrupt in with five years, two years ago, I still have some time.
  8. brenthutch
    Stupid guy with a gun, ends badly for him https://concealednation.org/2020/01/warning-graphic-robber-receives-head-shot-after-trying-to-hold-up-post-office-govt-official-shares-video-and-praises-defender/
  9. brenthutch
    You call an underaged victim of a character assassination by a giant corporation a “Little shit head” and you pointed out HER bias? That IS rich.
  10. brenthutch
    Still waiting for the "more severe storms and disrupt the water cycle, meaning more floods, droughts and wildfires"
  11. brenthutch
    Googled, "why would such a stupid lawsuit prevail" and that was at the top of the page
  12. brenthutch
    The Netherlands? That makes perfect sense.
  13. brenthutch
    When folks publish wrong, misleading and false articles (An Inconvenient Truth for example) they suffer no such sanction.
  14. brenthutch
    Since there is greater “consensus” about AGW then there was with smoking, those law suits should be raking in billions.
  15. brenthutch
    There it is again, conflating smoking with climate change.
  16. brenthutch
    I was just a few examples of how the "no one ever gets hurt from questioning AGW" narrative is wrong.
  17. brenthutch
    Then there is already a blueprint for successful litigation. Lawyers across the nation should be lining up to dig into those deep pockets. BillV tells us all of the time that CO2 is just like smoking, it should be an easy lift.
  18. brenthutch
    From your link "A growing number of citizens and communities are bringing lawsuits seeking relief from the detrimental effects of increased carbon dioxide emissions" If the damage is so clear and widespread, and the cause so easily attributable why can't I find a single example of a successful litigant?
  19. brenthutch
    Simple physics? Kallend what do you have to say about one of your peers, where is he wrong?
  20. brenthutch
    Couldn't find a single example, nothing outside the range of natural variability. I did find this though "There are a lot of ups and downs in the data, but no obvious trends." https://www.forbes.com/sites/rogerpielke/2020/01/09/tropical-cyclone-landfalls-around-the-world-over-the-past-50-years/?utm_source=CCNet%2BNewsletter&utm_campaign=63e5c6cabc-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2020_01_10_02_26&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_fe4b2f45ef-63e5c6cabc-20144013&mc_cid=63e5c6cabc&mc_eid=4961da7cb1#652c776b3b00
  21. brenthutch
    Yep and we can use it when it gets here. Meanwhile China has given up on green and is building a coal fired power plant every week,(with a lifespan of 30-50 years) India is not far behind and Africa is just getting started. To deny the Third World the opportunity to pull itself out of poverty, using cheap, reliable, and abundant fossil fuels is nothing short of neocolonialism.
  22. brenthutch
    What damage? Can you give a single example of "damage" that was irrefutably caused by AGW?
  23. brenthutch
    Let me address our newcomer. Is the planet warming? In some places yes, in others no, overall by a degree or two. Is the warming caused by man's activities? Perhaps. Is the warming an existential threat? Evidence would suggest otherwise. (Please don't site the last thunderstorm or wildfire as "evidence") Can we stop bad weather by going vegan, putting solar panels on our roofs, taxing carbon and buying a Tesla. Absolutely not. The simple fact is that atmospheric CO2 levels will continue to rise for the foreseeable future and there is absolutely nothing you can do about it. To riff off of Dr. Strangelove, you guys need to stop worrying and learn to love CO2. mic drop
  24. brenthutch
  25. brenthutch
    I don't get it, BillV said it was rain that caused wildfires (California with 120% rainfall than normal) and now it is drought that causes wildfires. Can you guys please get your act together.