
Zoe Phin
Members-
Content
131 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Feedback
N/A -
Country
United States
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Dropzones
Gear
Articles
Fatalities
Stolen
Indoor
Help
Downloads
Gallery
Blogs
Store
Videos
Classifieds
Everything posted by Zoe Phin
-
olof, How do you feel about these protoplanets:
-
Not according to science historians. When you have up to 6, it's collaboration, beyond that it's collusion.
-
olof, Never suggested VLT had film cameras. Nice distraction from the main point. You still didn't answer my question: how fast must a planet form so that the heat from gravitational collapse is not lost? Do you know?
-
A normal telescope has a camera attached. The original VLT had cameras. We had this technology for 100 years. But now we need "special" cameras to see. The old cameras could see billions of light years away, but for some reason can't see things 370 light years away. Weird. Why do you think that is?
-
olof, VLT may be 4 normal telescopes, but not VLT/Sphere or VLT/NaCo. Can't you read? Here's a clue: When you have THAT many authors, you're looking at COLLUSION, not science. You're being sold something. This pattern has been noted by historian scientists who study scientists, science organizations, etc. Please answer this, if you can, how fast must a planet form so that the heat from gravitational collapse is not lost? Do you know?
-
olof, I think it's cute that you think interferometry is like taking a picture and that there is no computer processing involved, and hence computer generated images. Even though that is exactly what it is. What paper did you just cite there? I looked at a different one from the link you gave and it's highly speculative and based on "models". You do realize we can see farther with normal telescopes, right? 370 light years is nothing. Why can't you just show a normal image from a normal telescope? Why rely on RADIO telescope arrays that need models for processing data?
-
Trolls come from Norse legends. Can you think of a less white supremacist term? No? Says a lot.
-
Is that what you would say to cultures that don't use spoons? How white supremacist of you.
-
Uhm, 100% YES. What predominant race do you think the French, English, Dutch, Nordics, Slavs, and Ashkenazi Jews (i.e. their targets) belong to? You can argue they funded and faught along with BLACK Namibians to kill other minority black tribes, but that's about 0.000001% of what they did. That's why they allied with Arabs and Japan? Weird white supremacists kill white people and ally with non-white people. Makes sense.
-
I don't know how your brain works, but when you adopt an asian symbol and go out and demean, maim, and kill mostly white people, how can you be a white supremacist? Don't liberals hate white people? Don't they wish to do to white people what the Nazis did to white people? Are you sure you know who's more nazi-like?
-
Say what? That is the most ridiculous thing I've heard. It's called the Bellamy salute. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bellamy_salute How can you be this ignorant ? Since when is pledging allegiance an exclusively nazi thing? Did you know nazis ate meat? You eat meat. Are you a nazi?
-
LOL. You're showing a computer generated image. Read the paper. There is no actual photo. There's plenty of image data processing, but NO ACTUAL image. It's another example of how desparate mainstream astronomy is. They did the same thing with the first "photo" of a black hole. Why do you need terabytes of data to capture a low res image? It's NOT done for REAL things. Sorry, olof, but you have NOTHING. Keep pretending. Cite pretenders. lol
-
Can you find the same people in the video praising Trump a little later into his presidency? Can you not find bigger crowds of Blacks and Hispanics for Trump? I can tell you every Korean and Vietnamese business in my area is pro Trump. Every single one. I don't even know how you get from White Nationalism to NAZIs. What race was the biggest victim of the Nazis? WHITE
-
People here are blind. Look closely at the back of the stage. Trump and Republicans have nothing in common with the Nazis.
-
If greenhouse effect is valid, how come different levels of it produces same result? http://phzoe.com/2021/02/12/effect-of-clouds-on-global-upwelling-radiation/
-
How long until debris activates gravity? Why not a minute before? Funny olof can't find photos of debris becoming planets. So many photos of debris disks ...
-
And you think this debris accumulated into a moon? How would that work? One debris slows down and then there's traffic pile up? lol Really? How about these photos from ? I don't see planets there. And it tells you: "The protoplanetary disk may also be considered an accretion disk for the star itself, because gases or other material may be falling from the inner edge of the disk onto the surface of the star. This process should not be confused with the accretion process thought to build up the planets themselves." They also later mention debris disks. Where's photos of planet formation? So many spirals of debris ...
-
So you know the answer you want and are waiting for the holes to get filled in to justify your answer in the first place. But you don't want holes plugged for other hypotheses. Odd. You know those holes have been there from the beginning? What bit of evidence will plug in holes for things you can't observe now? We have evidence of separate stars becoming binary stars. We have a bit of evidence of stars capturing planets. We have evidence of planets capturing satellites/moons/asteroids. And all we have for nebula hypothesis is ... simulations of how it could've happened. Occam's razor would suggest ... My theory is the LEAST unsensible.
-
Deimos is 8x Mars' radius distance from Mars. But you have no problem imagining Mars capturing Deimos. Are you suggesting Mars had an atmosphere 8x thicker than its radius? Why bend over backwars to explain Deimos and not Venus? Why do you presume Mercury always had the same orbit?
-
LOL. You admit too much. THE SUN has a thick atmosphere... Deimos is less eccentric than Venus. Your only argument is now proximity to similar objects. That means you reject lonely Venus apriori. What is your scientific basis for that?
-
olof, Why would you compare the size of Venus to Triton? You ought to be comparing Venus to THE SUN. I'm sure you have no problem with asteroid capture, right? You have no problem with Phobos and Deimos, right? And yet the size relationship between asteroids and its host planet is not far outside the Sun-Venus comparison. Anyone with integrity can see that you're crafting ad hoc excuses, and yet you can use that same ad hoc reasoning to agree with me that it's possible. Lame hypocrisy Maybe it did. Were you there to see it not happen?
-
Ah there we go. olof admits it's possible. olof is also apparently a time traveler. He went back time and saw that the sun didn't eject something. It must be exactly like he wants it to be.
-
olof, I see you're pressuming that Venus was standing still. I see you're ignoring Enceladus' south pole "thrusters" I see you're ignoring SIMILAR problems with the mainstream nebular hypothesis. I see your pathetic pretensions.
-
You can learn about all the problems with the standard nebular formation hypothesis. They're open about it. Or you can ridicule my specifics. Either way, actual space scientists acknowledge the highly speculative nature of their theories.