Royreader8812

A guy that admits his time confiscating property from Jews immediately prior to them being killed in genicide, was one of the best times of his life... I think your satanic radar needs a tune...If there is such a thing. Lol

This hypothetical situation is assuming the same canopy type, the same wingloading, the same turn and the sane velocity through the entry gate. At that point yes the 79 has less drag than the 90. Also the 79 is more sensitive to inputs so will be negatively effected by incorrect inputs. But this hypothetical situation is impossible to simulate in real life as no two.turns by one person are the same, let alone those by two different people. All you are doing us confusing the matter by overanalyzing something you misunderstood. That is probably due to my wording. But something I have said and you are reiterating,is that there are more forces at work, they all seem to effect each other somehow or another, and this is what makes swooping so interesting.

Palm is 500 jumps, or 300 with flight 101 and 102 or similar. For both dropzones you need, Liability insurance Log book showing currency Appropriate license, Palm is D license. That's it.

Mate you are misunderstanding my words. You just made a long winded attempt to say that a bigger canopy, Say a comp velo 90 loaded at 2.5... has the same parasitic drag as a comp velo 79. That is incorrect. The same canopy will have the same drag whether it is going into or down wind, sure. But the 75 will have the advantage in head wind due to having less drag. And the 90 will have the advantage down wind due to having more lift. Pretty simple.

Parasitic drag is a force that depends on surfaces area, down wind or into the wind has the same effect on the surfaces, but certainly not on the ground speed and distance covered. A bigger wing of the same wingloading as a smaller one of the same type, will have an advantage down wind, and a disadvantage into the wind. There are other forces involved, I don't claim to understand them nor be able to explain them, but I know it to be true from experience and observation. How about that.

Lol people losing their shit over the insinuation that the USA have killed people, is quite telling of their intellect. His reply is hardly an endorsement. It is condemnation of both parties, and that is a breath of fresh air.

It has more to do with parasitic drag. If we are talking about a smaller wing of the same type and wingloading having an advantage in head wind. The bigger wing would have more potential energy as the pilot would obviously have to be heavier than the person on the smaller wing to.have the same wingloading. But from my observation the extra parasitic drag of the bigger surfaces seem to negate the benefits of extra potential energy. Inversely, down wind the parasitic drag is less as the air is moving in the same direction of the canopy, reducing parasitic drag. So the potential energy of the bigger/ heavier pilot become an advantage. I am sure there are also more forces at work.

NDAA I'll be interested to see what happens when renewal of that act, crosses the Trump administration's path.

Don't misunderestimate the idiosyncrasies of old GW.

Because executing Americans and or detaining them indefinitely without charge or trial is well within the constitution. Old Barack 'bring the boys back, hope and change nobel peace boy' Obama trampled all over the constitution, was the first ever president to.be at war for his entire 2 term reign and bombed 7 countries, all Muslim... but he did it in style, with a smile and fist bumped the janitor, so he's cool. FFS Oh you said blatant. Gotcha

Nice try, an 8 week old embryo at 1-2 cm is not developed enough to have thoughts. Like the little swimmers in your nut sack that leave silver stains on your undies. Once they become a fetus a little further on, it still is not a viable human being. No amount of nurture would save it, If it was separated from its mother.

To be quite fair, I had heard the hoo ha over the abortion debate for ages, and thought the pro life argument was stupid. I had already been through that decision with a girlfriend, with little regret. I can't say no regret... but we felt comfortable with our decision. Our relationship was not really something either of us saw lasting to marriage, but we enjoyed each other's company, If you know what I am saying . This viewpoint was based on an understanding that the reason we were allowed to carry out the termination, was that it was well before the 20'week cutoff, it was a mutual agreement and the pregnancy posed a risk to the mental health of the mother. That was a requirement, where that rule about mental health is quite subjective, and they are relatively lenient with it. It does meant.it is not actually the woman's choice to end the life, it is her choice to seek approval. She can't go.and just say she can't be bothered with it and get an abortion. That, I believe is fair. After 20 weeks the only way that baby is dying by medical.procedure, would be to save the life of the mother. This whole my body my choice up until the day of birth, is completely foreign to my knowledge until recently. And in contrast with my ethics. So.yes, there is an alarming number of these going on, in my opinion. The videos I linked show that there are plenty of healthy people surviving this procedure, so that says there are ample being killed by it when.they were viable human beings. Surely killing a fetus is not actually that difficult to do. It is clear that many of these go unreported, because of fear of backlash. So who knows really. I.just find it hard to.understand how anyone could have so little empathy or respect or a life that is inside them and is capable of thoughts, feeling, pain and emotion. So as far as stats go, like rape or murder... one is more than enough Nd there are plenty. Each to their own.

Which are words, I have examples of actual people that survived the method that was used to try to kill them. Or because these people were still attached by the umbilical cord, do you suggest nothing is being killed?

Agreed, but at what point does that human growing inside her become valuable enough that she cannot decide to what she likes with his or her body. Legally or morally. Her body and another body inside her body, as in two bodies. That is the issue here

I agree with much of what you are saying. And my sister in law got preeclampsia at 6 months, baby was born, healthy kid now. The discussion often turns to legitimate reasons to end the pregnancy, but the fact still remains that people still abort fetuses that are perfectly healthy and already viable human beings, because they can't be bothered raising them. There are very few countries that set term limits on abortions, but don't allow them to save the life of the mother in an emergency. This is not the crux of the conversation either. There are in fact an alarming number of people aborting viable, healthy human beings. You can meet a bunch of them here https://www.google.com/search?q=abortion+survivors&gl=us&hl=en&pws=0&prmd=vin&source=lnms&tbm=vid&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj6tb3wgPnRAhWrCcAKHXueDvsQ_AUIBygB&biw=360&bih=524 These are the people I wish to discuss. I am not anti abortion, but I.do think that these type of people need some protection.

That depends on the definition of late term. I would say anything after 20 weeks is late term, because people survive out of the womb after this time. Just do a Google video search of 'abortion survivor's'. It is gut wrenching stuff,I don't see too many deformed ones either. Oh they are there, but a minority. These are just the survivors and there are many of them. It happens often enough. Ethics are very much tested in this subject, I would say people at both ends of the spectrum are the worst and selfishly tend to care only about their own views, while those willing to meet in the middle are usually the most empathetic. This is my view and like I said before, it is subjective.

Have you tried looking? I listened to a young woman talking that was born as a result of a failed saline injection abortion. She was adopted out anyway.

Well I can say that I have been in the position of deciding to abort a child, and decided mutually with my girlfriend at the time. No regrets, done at 8 weeks. I am also a father. I also have a couple of family members that were born before they even got to the third trimester. There are always exceptions to a rule and law, but there are clearly people that believe a woman has a choice to abort a child at 30+ weeks because they decide they can't be bothered anymore. This makes me feel sick in the stomach.

I disagree when it comes to late term, I see the statistics of this poll show that even in this small demographic. Some people think it is perfectly acceptable at any time of the pregnancy. It is obviously a heavily debated subject and therefore subjective... But I believe people that are OK with late term.abortion and believe the unborn child is not worth a dime are deplorable. My body my choice is acceptable to a point, but when there is a viable human being that could sustain life without the mother, this become two bodies. I have heard that purposefully killing a pregnant woman is classed as double homicide. I wonder if there is a distinction writhin that particular law/decision, as to how far along the 'mother' is to define the loss of 2 lives?

There is an other choice. And a forum to explain. My interest is in late term. I have always been pro choice. But knew there was a cutoff date for many. When I heard of people willingly aborting fetuses in the third trimester, I was appalled. Then I read debates and it seems to be all or nothing. But seems the middle ground is more accepted that the debates seem to indicate. Which is refreshing.

Go.

This doesn't seem to stop abortions from being performed. Just a certain procedure for late term terminations. If someone is raped, they will be able to tell by the end of the first trimester, and removing the embryo or early stage fetus. Doing a pregnancy test after 12 weeks is probably a rare occutance after a rape.

You see, he is president now. When I say knock that guy in the side of the head, to someone. That does not become a breach of law until perhaps that person does knock someone in the side of the head. That is quite different to telling someone, or in this case, millions of people to overthrow the government or assassinate the president. Neither is it the same as destroying public property (including, but not limited to, lamps ) and rioting causing damage to private property. There will be action taken and what I want that to be, bares no reflection on what will happen. We are all certainly interested. That includes the people removing Trump branded stock, out of fear of persecution.

Lol, no just sometimes I have time to edit, and sometimes not. Enough about me. What do you guys think Trump will do? Go full Reagan? Let it slide?

Smartphones, fat thumbs and grammar are not that compatible, for me anyway. Gimme a chance to do at least 2 of my usual 4 edits before you grill me on grammar. I don't have a desktop and my laptop is broken. So tiny txt, tiny keyboard and fat thumbs is what in have to deal with. I'll download swift key now to sort those damned full stops out. You really think respect is my ambition?