juanesky

In other words, if is not MCCain then it is Hillary? No problems master debater.... "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

Yes, the original claim was definitely rape. But based on his posting traditions, well it definitely speaks volumes. "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

Marry Christmas to all. And a happy new year.... "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

I can only [armchair quarterbacking] imagine [/armchair quarterbacking] the pains it must be to make it public, and not be heard. And those horror stories about becoming pregnant after rape. Not having the right to have an abortion under those circumstances is something outrageous. Yet, there are sometimes, (2 cases I can think off), is one involving Kobe, and the other one Tyson, are suspicious to find rape. One was found guilty and convicted, which after reading some of the details I agree, yet the other one, was more blurry. I don't blame the women in these 2 cases, but they certainly made a very stupid move. I mean what where they thinking?. Darwin's laws unfortunately get enforced most of the time. And I am talking about not of the victims responsibility for the other person's actions, but the victims responsibility about the consecuences of their actions. Edited to fix spelling and adding: If a woman says no, is no, period. If she is a minor, and you are an adult, even if she says she wants you, still is a rape, legally. And please don't take this comment as if I'm ok with the perpetrators of such a crime, cause I'm not. The victim will need support, but as a father I have a hard time trying to convey that a lesson must be learned, even if the event is unpleasant. "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

You see, second subject we are on agreement. The mindset that all women who cry rape is a victim is coeherent to what most family courts are effectively policing. It is rape if they say no, but there is also there a few who will definitely use that to get "even", or the upper hand. I don't doubt that most ladies partaking this debate are definitely right on about what rape is. The only issue I see, is that I wish one would come forward and agree that there is also the possibility of a woman abusing the system, just to get even. I have concerns for those who are rape victims, as well for those who can be abused by the system. Edited to Add: Rhonda, I think that people that say no, is no, every woman has a right to say no, regardless of how they are dressed, goes to a guy's/her place. That is rape. I don't think it would be a good idea for a woman to go to a rave party patronized by hell's angels in a bikini though!. But what about if a couple gets drunk, and wake up in the same bed not remembering much? will you consider that rape? Just curious to hear your answer. "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

Glad you "tactifully" called all US a bunch of white trash folks. Funny how your liberal ideas and profound hatred for anything US and irrational antigun stance is ok by most moderators in here, but god forbids if you decide to call terrorists "towel heads".... Long live the double standards!!! Thanks for reminding be.... "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

Yes, sure we understand you have difficulty understanding that you are commiting the same errors you are accusing Micro of. If you mean "MANY" who are those many? "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

[swooshing sound]I think you need to stay away from CBS, and Dan rather bud.[/swooshing sound] The opposite, that is what is exactly what is lacking on the liberal agenda, balls. Why don't you go off some where and vote for Hillary, I bet you are already getting those shirts by now. Hillary 2008!!! "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

Well, since you are so adamant of bringing your service into account, I see it on the same level as GWB. They were both honorable. He had to go to boot camp, and get trained. Serving is that, you are asked to do certain tasks and you do them. You are proud of your service, and so is GWB, who got a honorable discharge, and allowed to his military record to be opened to the anyone. You of all people would understand that the military is a joint effort, with some in combat, and others on the background helping each other out. On the other hand, your beloved Clinton, well, you see it as a matter of getting "some", while ignore the big issue at the time, that is lying under oath to get off from the sexual harrassment case, which he actually settled outside of court. I guess we both have agreed differently on what "honorable" means. I don't hate people because they get BJ's, as a matter of fact I like BJ's myself, but I get the feeling you won't understand that, since you don't think that a BJ is sexual in nature. I guess that a woman that offers them for pay is not considered a prostitute...according to your beliefs. About my service, you shouldn't worry, I stand up for what I believe in. "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

My bad the word is Phrase "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

They are not CONTACT sports though or at least not intentionally

Don't know, but the comments sound pretty dellusional. I don't hate GW, but that &*^%&^% Neocon-ultra righties bitches... Oh well, she likes to compare herself to her beloved skerry, as in service, but doesn't have the guts to admit that GWB also served. I prefer a commander in chief who at least has gone through military trainning, then a sexual harrasser, who lies under oath. "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

And not in RI either. Good job Flygurl... "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

I think you need to send your hat for repairs. "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

No, not really. 1) If UK had "free" dental plans for its citizens, then most citizens that show really bad teeth (as it is customary, just see a few pic of your beloved fucktard of prince) are just plain ass lazy. 2) You must assume that there is no jewish population based in on of your points, and that could be attributed to the following: a) In their centuries of systematic colony abusing policy, they hunted them down, just as they fucked them over in Palestine-Israel ordeal after WWII, or just as they did to many people around the world, including the Irish. b) In the best held British tradition, they continue to give any UK citizens a treatment of second class if they either are not white, protestant, and have no british last name. Please check history of India, Pakistan, Africa, Egpyt. I think the only exception to the British Rule is Hong Kong. 3) It is very well known your hooligans, and their affiliation to football. 4) Apparently, you have never seen a baseball or a basketball game ever in your life, as these are played without armour. 5) Never mind....... "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

Related to the story: clicky Also check this "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

You definitely make no sense in your last paragraph. Neither does your comment in regards to the "veiled innuendos" in your first one. What I see here clearly, is that you call most people that own guns, morons and inclined to violence, a not so clever and subtle "veiled innuendo". Keep meaning well!!! "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

Don't you see that calling you facist, while most on lefty side of center just clap and say "great post" is just an irony? What about what most trying to claim that NSA Spying is just the same as what Saddam was doing? Yes indeed, lets follow the UK sample of the cams all over the place... "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

Not really, except for afterwards one reads the crap you write... "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

That's cool Bill, as usual, you seemed to forgo his comments about me sounding like Laura Bush, and actually find my comment.... Never mind. "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

So you prefer to complain just like my little girl, who is 6, with infantile emotions (about things she wants....) and in doing so you call me Barbara Bush. In the meantime you also state that you would not go there to help those you so vividly defend only in words and no in actions. Hmm. Interesting how you rather act like Jessie Jackson and admit that all those that went there were bigots and racist before understanding the reality of what some elements were doing there. At it is very describing what you say about those innocent that perished in the hands of the same people you are for some very strange reason, trying to protect in the "race card" shield. Very commending. If your buddies/relatives in the bloods or crips do stupid shit that gets them killed, you should follow your own advice pal.....IMO. "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

Seems like you have a severe difficulty adding numbers. Claiming there has only been 5K missing only is a gross disinformation. Good luck in obtaining some light for the info you get.... "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

Heard this movie was a pain in the ass "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

And he is talking everytime in terms as it is "us" that started, when in fact he has never voted in the US, and sometimes post as a more like a "them" type of posts... "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

In my book he is. For a president that pushed for sexual harassment laws in this land, he fell short of becoming a fellon, not because of lack of proof, but for a free pass by fellow democrats. Bush haters try to make this an issue of having a blow job, but how come a guy that had to settle with a woman for showing her his "goods" and then lying under oath about it get such a freebie? If it were someone else in the other side of the aisle, a la Delay, will get crucified by factless indicments. Just try to lie under oath and see what happens to you. "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon