juanesky

All PRISONS are concentration camps. The words Nazi and Camps together, and then comparing it to Gitmo, sounds out of place. I know he explained that later, but still, forgot to mention, that concentration camps were also found in Germany, thus a theory about them being in Poland does not really make sense unless you are trying to manipulate the facts. "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

So where is the spinning you view it that the reason the Nazi's had concentration camps in Poland, is Basically that the did want to avoid a home mess, which is false. THe reason the Nazi's concentration camps were created was first and foremost to exterminate people. And that is my point, trying to explain that I am twisting anyone's words, well, that is fine, but it is not about wording. Back in WWII, the jewish where first put in ghettos, then moved to the concentration camps, which also happen to exist in Germany. It was a matter of logistic to where they were installed, not a matter of principle. The explanation about being categorized about being dumb, was not meaning of your response, but your insistence that I'm spinning words around. Any mention of a NAZI concentration camp can not in any way shape of form be put in the same level as Guantanamo. That is actually spinning the words, trying to imply that is about location. It really is a place where a prison won't be bombed, or a rescue attempt from the terrorists to their fellow comrades will most likely failed. No pun intended, and you don't really have to say things for others either, speak for yourself, or are you an elected official "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

Hey, that is fine, but you are implying that I am dumb, because I see this, as a way to seek extermination, for this is what actually happened, and I'm am not (saddly) making this up. The main reason the concentration camps where opened, was in order to comply the FINAL SOLUTION to the JEWISH problem. "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

No this is what Kallend said: ----------------------------------------------------------- Can anyone give any good reason as to why they're being held in a camp in Cuba? ------------------------------------------------------------ Same reason as the Nazis shipped the majority of Jews to camps in Poland? (this is Kallend's response.) ------------------------------------------------------------ So I take it he meant the reason of extermination, slavery, and not only in "concentration" camps with the disclaimer of "any similarities with actual and real life people is mere coincidence". So, in order to have a good debate, then don't lie that people are spinning words around. Kallend's response was completely copied, not half sentence, nor putting more words into it. "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

Good lord Remi! You still insist that the people in Cuba are there to be put in chamber gas, use as slaves, and we will even pull their gold teeth, and use their hairs, etc, etc, etc? Gee. Same reason right or is it that you see it as EXTERMINATION, or rather to stop TERRORISM? Edited to add: Very different agendas, and very different reasons. This is in no way spinning someone's words. "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

Well, that is fine how you want to put it, but the fact is that if you say that it is a NAZI concentration camp, you are implying that is the same thing at all levels. To me is like Riker's only without the sodomy. "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

Kevin, Once more you don’t answer a direct question. You cry slandering, and yet you have not shown a single post where I am for drinking and indulging my self in either alcohol or drugs for recreation, nor pro legalization, yet you are. I asked you for who is it oppressive, and your answer was to give me the actual definition of word oppressive. Pot is cultivated on the ground and naturally and so are poisonus mushrooms. They are both dangerous, and worlwide it is a crime to be in possesion of drugs, where is the oppression there?, what is your agenda being pro-legalization of pot, is it for your own use or is it an intended distribution business for you? You seem so hung on saying it is because you find it oppressive, yet you don’t sound honest, and go out to hint stating it is oppresive, and it has never killed anyone and it is safe. I see the only oppressed are the consumers, dealers, and growers, only few of the consumers are people that need it, terminal illness and people with lots of pain, but I’m no doctor to assess this. If you are pro legalizing it, and go such lengths to imply it is ok, safe and does not hurt anyone then you must belong to one of the group. Is this clear for you or you will keep on editing and running away from your self truth? As for those who state that Guantanamo is like a concentration camp, like Nazi’s in WWII, well, ”wow”. If you are so hung about it, write and call and bug your elected officials to change the laws, there was a war you know, and this people where there combating, and most are likely to belong to Al-Qaeda, the reason behind this is obvious, Taliban and Al-Qaeda are very much related. The failure has been in prolonging a military tribunal, and charge them, there is no dispute there, but those people are not part of “we the people” they have no rights to vote, nor take in any decision on vote, they are not represented by a congressman, and have fought against US, tell that to any allien in the process of deportation, it is a moral one, perhaps, but all of them know there is always a risk when you break a law, particulary if you go into a country that you are not citizen of, it is basically common sense. The only agenda I have stated here is actually put my ass in the line of fire, to defend the constitution, US land and its people, in whatever is required for me to do, even if that means either being behind a desk, bearing arms, or whatever they might see fit for me to do, in other to preserve all of the above, and the very institutions and way of life the terrorist have proven to want destroyed. In the other hand most people here are bent into protect them. What an Irony, you all have so many priviledges, and yet do not focus your energies in trying to go to the regular established channels to try to fix what is that you think is wrong, instead, rather prefer useless complaints, and annoying marches, personal attacks that do create nuissance for those who you are trying to "protect" falsely. It is an Irony. Use your own laws, and get your asses on the line while respecting other's people's rights. "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

Well, they are not bareless, you want to make it legal (for opression against who?), you profess they have never killed anyone (referring to pot). You asked for instances, and when caught you don't say things straight, but more excuses, keep insiting that you need alcohol to enhance your own capabilities, with women, and no, no jealousy with strippers there pal. So how can you admit you really are pro pot, like pot and seek it to be legal for your own consumption? What question will enlicit for you to be forthcoming with a simple answer to a simple question? Pot or not? "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

Find one instance of that anywhere. Go ahead. I have said that I don't like drug laws and think they are harmful to society. Once again, your wine soaked brain apparently misinterpreting simple statements. Which one, when you cry like a baby, when someone calls on your character?, if so clicky (where you want to hook up good pot) and this one in which you imply that pot smoking has ever induced a death. Do you have a hidden agenda? there are many more like these if you'd like Or the part where you are the one that needs alcohol to meet women and enjoy yourself? Clicky and clicky There has been instances when I have told you right in hear that I do not agree with drug use for recreational purposes, I do make direct statements, not like you that goes about it hiding, what is your intention of being pro pot? If you don't say it, then you like it, promote it, pretend is safe, and most likely smoke it. Don't come crying that this is slander to you. Grow up and be a man.

Don't forget your diapers... "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

Well put JD. "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

Well does not surprise me that you also have attention spans. What part of I do not like drugs you don't understand? "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

Not hypocrite, you love dope, and so passionate about it, you defend a drug user, at your pace nachop and edit words when you most feel like. You cry about someone slandering you, but then you profess to everyone here, you like dope, you smoke dope and are pro dope....so let me guess..... Edited to add: Per your own convictions and postings I have not once stated here or anywhere else that I like to be drunk as a form of recreation, as you do profess with dope, so no, I am not being hypocryte. I say what I mean and mean what I say, don't go over posting crap saying hey, what do you think abou this? and then cry like a baby when someone reminds you what your character is.... "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

If you are recklesly making a demonstration, then that is your choice to, don't tell me the pacifist are kind people when they do demonstrations. They are annoying when they take over a very public place where people are trying to get out of work get on a train to get their sons or daughters after a hard days work. It is safe when they have the police around to let them know what is off limits, and crowds passionate in what they believe they get intend on making as much damage as they can. Tkae what happened in Seattle a few years back, or the righteous anti abortion people, and so.... I don't protest, I just want my chance to go after these towel heads. "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

You can't pretend to make your point accross if you start blurting insults as you have already, calling people who don't agree with you facists, and drunks, because they don't agree, as much as you say I don't get it, you have at least see your true point of view to this matter, but have hesitation and very prompt urge to call names if one tells you that I want to excise the right to protect myself. It sucks both ways. But one thing as far as I can see, is that you still enjoy all the freedoms, you still can go and vote, go just about every place on earth, wihtout anyone stopping you, even write e-mails with the words Ossama, bomb those pricks, terrorisms etc, without having the FBI on your back, now, if you attempt to do something like mr. Blade runner on the airliners, and box cutters, then don't complain the FBI will be all over your ass charging you with such things. "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

Amazon, you could kindly put the insults to one side, calling people drunk withou evidence nor posting to the likings, means I do not like either drugs nor alcohol as a way to entertain myself. Neither I am facist, event though you seem contempt to say it. You are referring to the patriot act, and I am referring to the terrorists you are so prone to defend. "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

LMAO...... "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

Ahem, Amazon, I don't think that really getting with box cutters into an airliner, and taking ove and diving it to a building is near a party standard followed by the current administration. "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

I Love Arafat.... "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

Well, I guess we will need to learn how to love and respect the terrorist to be in the good graces of these people... "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

Tom, Do you jump in Newport? "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

It is not you. Just overwhelming different roads to get to Rome, thus the confussion. Can you send the CD to someone close to home that have fast internet conection (not dial up like yours)? yours at 52kbps, is way too slow, and it will take many hours for completion. Again if you still have questions, ask. There will be plenty of volunteers, myself included to offer explanation.... Blue skies my friend

Well you got things accomplished, but your internet conection will not be fast enough...good job by the way Michele.... "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

By the way welcome, and you will find that Rhode Island has cool places....In downtown providence, east providence, as well as parks, it is a small state, but close to many interesting things.... Not so expensive to dine out in good places, Portuguese food is great around here.... PM me ans ask, I personally still getting to know RI after 2 years, but like it. "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon

Most people here are right, East providence is a good place. But why don't you rent an apartment before moving here, and as for the rest in the forum, where do you jump?..... "According to some of the conservatives here, it sounds like it's fine to beat your wide - as long as she had it coming." -Billvon